5 Questions
True or false: The six separate judgments rendered in the case spoke through different voices.
False
True or false: The Supreme Court of India declared that the Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to privacy.
False
True or false: The ruling in the case infused life into the Constitution’s text, resulting in a change in the meaning ascribed to rights in statutes.
False
True or false: The culture of justification, grounded in principles such as proportionality, is commonly observed in the conversation surrounding the interpretation of statutes.
False
True or false: Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, grants untrammelled police power to forcibly search persons and their properties, and seize goods found during such a search.
True
Study Notes
Judgments in the Case
- The six separate judgments rendered in the case spoke through different voices.
Fundamental Right to Privacy
- The Supreme Court of India did not declare that the Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to privacy.
Impact of the Ruling
- The ruling in the case infused life into the Constitution's text, resulting in a change in the meaning ascribed to rights in statutes.
Culture of Justification
- The culture of justification, grounded in principles such as proportionality, is commonly observed in the conversation surrounding the interpretation of statutes.
Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
- Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, grants untrammelled police power to forcibly search persons and their properties, and seize goods found during such a search.
Test your knowledge about the fundamental right to privacy in India, as declared by the Supreme Court in the Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India case. Explore the significance of the verdict and its impact on civil rights jurisprudence.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
