Podcast
Questions and Answers
How do Ashenfelter and Krueger utilize monozygotic twins in their study to address the issue of omitted variable bias in estimating the returns to schooling?
How do Ashenfelter and Krueger utilize monozygotic twins in their study to address the issue of omitted variable bias in estimating the returns to schooling?
- By exploiting the genetic similarity and shared family backgrounds of twins to minimize the influence of unobserved ability on the schooling-wage relationship. (correct)
- By comparing the wage rates of twins with similar schooling levels to control for genetic differences.
- By focusing on dizygotic twins to maximize the variation in genetic endowments and isolate the impact of schooling.
- By using twins raised apart to eliminate the effect of shared environmental factors on educational attainment.
What methodological approach did Ashenfelter and Krueger employ to evaluate and mitigate the impact of measurement error in reported schooling levels?
What methodological approach did Ashenfelter and Krueger employ to evaluate and mitigate the impact of measurement error in reported schooling levels?
- Relying on official educational records to obtain precise schooling data, thereby reducing potential reporting errors.
- Collecting independent reports of each sibling's schooling level from both twins to create a cross-validation mechanism. (correct)
- Applying a uniform correction factor to all reported schooling levels derived from national averages to account for systemic biases.
- Using statistical techniques to extrapolate schooling levels based on wage data, assuming a direct relationship between income and education.
How do the findings of Ashenfelter and Krueger challenge previous research on the economic returns to schooling?
How do the findings of Ashenfelter and Krueger challenge previous research on the economic returns to schooling?
- By showing that the returns to schooling are approximately the same as previous estimates but are more equitably distributed across different demographic groups.
- By estimating substantially larger returns to schooling after correcting for measurement error, suggesting prior studies underestimated the benefits of additional education. (correct)
- By suggesting that returns to schooling are significantly lower than previously estimated, indicating an overinvestment in education.
- By demonstrating that the returns to schooling are highly variable and dependent on the specific field of study, making generalizations unreliable.
What implications can be derived from Ashenfelter and Krueger's findings with respect to the impact of unobserved ability on educational attainment and subsequent wages?
What implications can be derived from Ashenfelter and Krueger's findings with respect to the impact of unobserved ability on educational attainment and subsequent wages?
According to the study, what is the key methodological improvement that allows for a more accurate estimation of the economic returns to schooling compared to traditional methods?
According to the study, what is the key methodological improvement that allows for a more accurate estimation of the economic returns to schooling compared to traditional methods?
What is the primary conclusion drawn by Ashenfelter and Krueger regarding the role of measurement error in previous studies on the returns to schooling?
What is the primary conclusion drawn by Ashenfelter and Krueger regarding the role of measurement error in previous studies on the returns to schooling?
How might the findings of Ashenfelter and Krueger influence policy decisions related to education and investment in human capital?
How might the findings of Ashenfelter and Krueger influence policy decisions related to education and investment in human capital?
What are the potential limitations or caveats associated with generalizing the findings of Ashenfelter and Krueger's study to broader populations?
What are the potential limitations or caveats associated with generalizing the findings of Ashenfelter and Krueger's study to broader populations?
Considering Ashenfelter and Krueger's findings, what alternative strategies could researchers adopt to further refine estimates of the economic returns to schooling?
Considering Ashenfelter and Krueger's findings, what alternative strategies could researchers adopt to further refine estimates of the economic returns to schooling?
What are the implications of Ashenfelter and Krueger's study for interpreting prior research that did not account for measurement error and omitted ability variables?
What are the implications of Ashenfelter and Krueger's study for interpreting prior research that did not account for measurement error and omitted ability variables?
According to Mincer's (1974) model, what specific condition must be met for the proportional increase in earnings per year of schooling to accurately reflect the rate of return on schooling investments?
According to Mincer's (1974) model, what specific condition must be met for the proportional increase in earnings per year of schooling to accurately reflect the rate of return on schooling investments?
Based on the data provided in Table 1, which of the following statements accurately compares the self-reported education levels across the three groups?
Based on the data provided in Table 1, which of the following statements accurately compares the self-reported education levels across the three groups?
Considering the correlation matrix for identical twins (Table 2A), what does the correlation coefficient of 0.563 between Y1 and Y2 suggest?
Considering the correlation matrix for identical twins (Table 2A), what does the correlation coefficient of 0.563 between Y1 and Y2 suggest?
In the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression results presented in Table 3, what is the implication of the coefficient for the 'White' variable being -0.410?
In the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression results presented in Table 3, what is the implication of the coefficient for the 'White' variable being -0.410?
Based on the information in Table 3, evaluate the effect of age on earnings, considering both 'Age' and 'Age Squared' coefficients. At what point does the relationship between age and earnings begin to diminish, assuming earnings are the dependent variable?
Based on the information in Table 3, evaluate the effect of age on earnings, considering both 'Age' and 'Age Squared' coefficients. At what point does the relationship between age and earnings begin to diminish, assuming earnings are the dependent variable?
How would you interpret the R-squared value of 0.260 in the OLS regression presented in Table 3, considering the factors influencing earnings?
How would you interpret the R-squared value of 0.260 in the OLS regression presented in Table 3, considering the factors influencing earnings?
Considering the data on twins reporting the same education levels, what implications can be drawn from the differences between identical and fraternal twins?
Considering the data on twins reporting the same education levels, what implications can be drawn from the differences between identical and fraternal twins?
Based on the provided descriptive statistics (Table 1), what can be inferred about the union coverage across the twin groups and the general population?
Based on the provided descriptive statistics (Table 1), what can be inferred about the union coverage across the twin groups and the general population?
Suppose you want to estimate the causal effect of education on wages using an OLS regression. Given the potential for omitted variable bias (e.g., ability), how might using the 'General Least Squares' estimate, which averages schooling reports from twins, address this methodological concern?
Suppose you want to estimate the causal effect of education on wages using an OLS regression. Given the potential for omitted variable bias (e.g., ability), how might using the 'General Least Squares' estimate, which averages schooling reports from twins, address this methodological concern?
Figure 1 (not provided) contains a scatter diagram of the intrapair (logarithmic) wage difference against the intrapair schooling difference. Assume the scatterplot shows a positive relationship. What could this visually suggest about the effect of schooling differences on wage differences within twin pairs?
Figure 1 (not provided) contains a scatter diagram of the intrapair (logarithmic) wage difference against the intrapair schooling difference. Assume the scatterplot shows a positive relationship. What could this visually suggest about the effect of schooling differences on wage differences within twin pairs?
If the estimate for own education using instrumental variables is 0.105, what does this suggest about the relationship between education and wages, accounting for potential endogeneity?
If the estimate for own education using instrumental variables is 0.105, what does this suggest about the relationship between education and wages, accounting for potential endogeneity?
Given the empirical covariance between Ay and AS' is 0.338 (from Table 8), how does this covariance inform our understanding of the relationship between wage differences (Ay) and schooling differences (AS') among twins?
Given the empirical covariance between Ay and AS' is 0.338 (from Table 8), how does this covariance inform our understanding of the relationship between wage differences (Ay) and schooling differences (AS') among twins?
In the context of maximum likelihood estimates, what is the key distinction between models with 'independent errors' and 'correlated errors' in the analysis of twin data?
In the context of maximum likelihood estimates, what is the key distinction between models with 'independent errors' and 'correlated errors' in the analysis of twin data?
If the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimate for AS
(years of schooling) is 0.107 and the Instrumental Variable (IV) estimate is 0.129, what can be inferred about the potential bias in the OLS estimate?
If the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimate for AS
(years of schooling) is 0.107 and the Instrumental Variable (IV) estimate is 0.129, what can be inferred about the potential bias in the OLS estimate?
Based on Table 10, which presents the theoretical moment matrix, what does the term $\beta{\sigma{^2}_{\delta_s}}$ in the covariance between Ay and AS' represent, and what does it imply?
Based on Table 10, which presents the theoretical moment matrix, what does the term $\beta{\sigma{^2}_{\delta_s}}$ in the covariance between Ay and AS' represent, and what does it imply?
How might measurement error in reported education levels affect Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates of the return to schooling, and how do instrumental variable (IV) techniques attempt to address this?
How might measurement error in reported education levels affect Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimates of the return to schooling, and how do instrumental variable (IV) techniques attempt to address this?
Considering the diagram's portrayal of twin data, with 'Difference in Log Hourly Wage' on the vertical axis and 'Difference in Years of Schooling' on the horizontal axis, how does the scatter of data points inform us about the role of factors other than education in explaining wage differences?
Considering the diagram's portrayal of twin data, with 'Difference in Log Hourly Wage' on the vertical axis and 'Difference in Years of Schooling' on the horizontal axis, how does the scatter of data points inform us about the role of factors other than education in explaining wage differences?
In the context of correlated measurement errors in twin studies, how does the correlation of errors within twin pairs affect the estimated return to schooling ($\beta$), and what could cause such correlated errors?
In the context of correlated measurement errors in twin studies, how does the correlation of errors within twin pairs affect the estimated return to schooling ($\beta$), and what could cause such correlated errors?
What is the primary challenge in estimating the causal effect of education on wages using observational data, and how do instrumental variable (IV) techniques attempt to address this challenge?
What is the primary challenge in estimating the causal effect of education on wages using observational data, and how do instrumental variable (IV) techniques attempt to address this challenge?
Given the GLS estimate uses own education as the instrumental variable, what concern might arise regarding the validity of these estimates, and how could one assess the strength of this instrument?
Given the GLS estimate uses own education as the instrumental variable, what concern might arise regarding the validity of these estimates, and how could one assess the strength of this instrument?
Flashcards
Economic Returns to Schooling
Economic Returns to Schooling
The increase in wages resulting from an additional year of schooling.
Monozygotic Twins
Monozygotic Twins
Individuals with identical genes and similar upbringing, useful for controlling genetic and environmental factors.
Measurement Error
Measurement Error
Inaccuracies in reported schooling levels that can distort estimates of returns to schooling.
Omitted Ability Variables
Omitted Ability Variables
Signup and view all the flashcards
Omitted Variable Bias
Omitted Variable Bias
Signup and view all the flashcards
Twin Studies
Twin Studies
Signup and view all the flashcards
Independent Verification
Independent Verification
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wage Premium
Wage Premium
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ability Bias
Ability Bias
Signup and view all the flashcards
Error Correction
Error Correction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rate of Return to Schooling
Rate of Return to Schooling
Signup and view all the flashcards
Correlation
Correlation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Scatter Diagram (Wage vs. Schooling)
Scatter Diagram (Wage vs. Schooling)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Education Reporting Discrepancies
Education Reporting Discrepancies
Signup and view all the flashcards
Self-Reported Education
Self-Reported Education
Signup and view all the flashcards
Hourly Wage
Hourly Wage
Signup and view all the flashcards
White (Variable)
White (Variable)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Female (Variable)
Female (Variable)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Self-Employed
Self-Employed
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wage Variation
Wage Variation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Instrumental Variables (IV)
Instrumental Variables (IV)
Signup and view all the flashcards
IV Estimate
IV Estimate
Signup and view all the flashcards
Δs
Δs
Signup and view all the flashcards
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Signup and view all the flashcards
OLS Estimate
OLS Estimate
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ay
Ay
Signup and view all the flashcards
Unrestricted estimates
Unrestricted estimates
Signup and view all the flashcards
0.336
0.336
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- The study contrasts wages of genetically twins with differing schooling
- Multiple measurements of schooling levels were collected to assess the effect of reporting error on the estimated economic returns to schooling
- Omitted ability variables do not bias the estimated return to schooling upward
- Measurement error does bias it downward
- Adjusting for measurement error indicates each additional year of schooling increases wages by 12-16%
- This is a higher estimate of the economic returns to schooling than previously found
- The returns to schooling are estimated by contrasting the wage rates of identical twins with different schooling levels
- Monozygotic twins are genetically identical and have similar family backgrounds
- Independent estimates of each sibling's schooling level were obtained by asking the twins to report on both their own and their twin's schooling
Quantifying Measurement Error
- The study examines the role of quantifying measurement error when determining the economic returns to schooling
- Each year of schooling increases a worker's wage rate by 12-16%
- Unobserved ability may be negatively related to schooling level
- Measurement error may lead to considerable underestimation of the returns to schooling in studies based on siblings
Data and Methodology
- Independent measures of each sibling's schooling level were obtained
- Monozygotic twins are genetically identical
- Data was collected at the 16th Annual Twins Days Festival in Twinsburg, Ohio, in August 1991
- The Twinsburg Festival is the largest gathering of twins in the world
- Over 495 separate individuals over the age of 18 were interviewed during the three days of the festival
- The data-collection instrument was patterned after the questionnaire used by the Bureau of the Census for the Current Population Survey (CPS)
- Whether the twins were identical or fraternal was determined
- The interviewing technique employed a team of five interviewers
- Twins were separated for each of their interviews
Sample Demographics
- The sample is better educated and more highly paid than the CPS sample
- The sample is also younger and contains more women and whites than the CPS sample
- Identical twins in the sample tend to have similar education levels, and bear a closer similarity than fraternal twins
Statistical Analysis
- The correlations between (logarithmic) wages, (self-reported and sibling-reported) education levels, and father's and mother's education levels are analyzed
Measurement Error Extent
- Estimates include errors in data
- Classical model of measurement error can be written as Sm = S + vm where S is the true schooling level and vm (m = 1,2) are measurement errors that are uncorrelated with S (n = 1,2) and with each other
- The assumption that the measurement errors are uncorrelated with each other may be relaxed by allowing a family fixed effect in the measurement error, or a correlation between the two reports by a single twin
- This ratio is sometimes called the "reliability ratio" of the schooling measure
- The two estimates of the reliability ratio for the twins schooling levels are 0.92 and 0.88
- Between 8% and 12% of the measured variance in schooling levels is error
- Reliability ratios are around 0.86 for the father's schooling and 0.84 for the mother's schooling
Conceptual Framework
- Equations for the logarithms of the wage rates of the first and second twins in the ith pair (y1i and y2i)
- Variable sets that vary by family (Xi) and twins must be accounted for (Z1i and Z2i)
- Variable in X include age, race, measures of family background
- Variable in Z include the education levels, union status, job tenure, and marital status of each twin
- Wage rates as consisting of an unobservable component that varies by family μ, observable components that vary by family (X), observable components that vary across individuals Z1 and Z2;
- Unobservable individual components (81 and 82)
- Selection effects are precisely “omitted-variable bias."
Measurement Error Impact
- Classical measurement error in schooling will lead to bias in the estimators of the effect of schooling on wage rates
- Ordinary least-squares regression coefficient in the presence of measurement error in schooling is attenuated by an amount equal to the reliability ratio
- Measurement error causes a smaller asymptotic bias here than in the standard fixed-effects estimator because the averaging decreases the measurement error as a fraction of the total variance in the independent variable
- With a reliability ratio of 0.9 and a correlation between the twins' self-reported schooling of 0.66
- Fixed-effects estimator would be biased downward by 0.1/(1-0.66) = 0.294, or about 30% relative to its value in the absence of measurement error
- Straightforward consistent estimator assuming classical measurement error, may be obtained by the method of instrumental variables using the independent measures of the schooling variables as instruments
Regression Analysis
- Each sibling's report of his (or her) sibling's education level is used as an instrumental variable for his (or her) sibling's education level
- These instrumental-variables estimates are much larger than the least-squares estimates
- These are consistent with that a considerable fraction of the variability in reported differences in twins' education levels is due to measurement error
- If the sibling reports are valid instruments, it seems likely that conventional methods are producing serious underestimates of the economic returns to schooling
- Tests of the effect of measurement error on estimates of the returns Simple averages of the multiple indicators of education levels are used as independent variables:
- All of the estimates larger than corresponding estimates
- Further evidence that measurement error is producing a downward bias in conventional estimates of the returns to schooling.
- These estimates yield returns to education that are 3 percentage points smaller than specifications that use differences in sibling reports of education as the instrument for differences in own-reported education
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This study contrasts wages of twins with differing schooling. It examines the role of quantifying measurement error when determining economic returns to schooling. Adjusting for this error indicates each additional year of schooling increases wages by 12-16%.