Regulatory Offences in Canada
48 Questions
3 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the primary purpose of the 'halfway house' approach in regulatory offences?

  • To shift the burden of proof to the Crown
  • To automatically convict defendants
  • To remove the actus reus requirement
  • To allow defendants to prove their innocence (correct)
  • In absolute liability offences, the Crown must prove the existence of mens rea.

    False

    List the three categories of criminal offences recognized in Canadian law.

    Full mens rea offences, strict liability offences, absolute liability offences.

    The 'halfway house' approach shifts the burden of proof to the accused after the Crown proves the __________.

    <p>actus reus</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following categories of offences with their descriptions:

    <p>Full mens rea offences = Require the Crown to prove all mens rea elements Strict liability offences = Permit the defence of due diligence Absolute liability offences = No need for the Crown to prove mens rea and no defence allowed</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following factors does NOT need to be examined to designate a regulatory offence as strict or absolute liability?

    <p>The defendant's prior convictions</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the Sault Ste Marie case that the 'halfway house' approach should be applied to all regulatory offences.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Wholesale Travel Group Inc. case, what did the Court rule about the onus on the accused proving 'due diligence'?

    <p>It did not render the relevant legislation invalid under the Charter.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the minimum period a dangerous offender must serve before being eligible for parole?

    <p>7 years</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Persons convicted of first-degree murder in Canada are eligible for parole after serving 10 years.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What percentage of any fine imposed on an offender is designated as a victim surcharge?

    <p>30%</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An offender convicted of second-degree murder must serve between __________ and __________ years before being eligible for parole.

    <p>10, 25</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the type of murder with its respective parole eligibility period:

    <p>First-degree murder = 25 years Second-degree murder = 10 to 25 years Dangerous offender = 7 years Statutory release = 10 years</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens if an offender is unable to pay the victim surcharge?

    <p>They may participate in a provincial fine option program</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Restitution is a form of punishment for offenders requiring them to pay the victim for losses incurred due to the crime.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary purpose of collecting a victim surcharge?

    <p>To provide assistance for victims of crime</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must the Crown prove to convict someone under section 23(1) of the Criminal Code?

    <p>Knowledge that a crime has been committed</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An accused person can be convicted of manslaughter while the principal offender is convicted of murder.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does section 22 of the Criminal Code specify about counseling another person?

    <p>An individual who counsels another to commit an offence becomes a party to that offence if it is ultimately committed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An accused can escape liability under section 21(2) by asserting that the part who committed the offence went beyond the scope of the __________.

    <p>common intention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following definitions to their respective terms:

    <p>Accessory after the fact = Someone who helps a criminal evade capture Counseling = Encouraging someone to commit an offence Inchoate offences = Crimes that are not fully executed Mens rea = The mental state of intent in committing a crime</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does it mean to 'counsel' someone in the context of the Criminal Code?

    <p>To persuade or incite another to commit an offence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Actual intention is the only mens rea that can be applied to the offence of counseling.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required to absolve an accused of criminal responsibility under section 21(2)?

    <p>Timely and unequivocal communication of intention to withdraw from the common intent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must the prosecution prove in a strict liability offense regarding careless driving?

    <p>The accident occurred due to lack of due care and attention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A person charged with an absolute liability offense can prove they acted with due diligence to avoid punishment.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main difference between strict liability and absolute liability offences?

    <p>Absolute liability does not allow for defenses like due diligence, while strict liability does.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The judicial process in criminal cases presumes a person is __________ until proven guilty.

    <p>innocent</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes absolute liability offences?

    <p>No defenses can be used to exculpate the accused</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Jail time is typically a possible punishment for conviction of strict liability offences.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Once a strict liability offense is established, the onus shifts to the __________ person to prove due diligence.

    <p>accused</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following legal terms with their definitions:

    <p>Strict Liability = Offense requiring proof of lack of due care Absolute Liability = Offense with no available defenses Presumption of Innocence = Accused is assumed innocent until proven guilty Judicial Process = Process to determine guilt or innocence in criminal cases</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be shown for an accused person to claim the defence of provocation?

    <p>They acted in a sudden manner.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A victim's actions that were legally permissible can be considered provocation.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens if the accused person initiates the altercation with the victim in a provocation case?

    <p>The defence will fail.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Beard Rules govern the defence of __________.

    <p>intoxication</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under the Beard Rules, when must an accused be acquitted based on intoxication?

    <p>If intoxication induces a mental disorder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Intoxication can serve as a defence for crimes of basic intent.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does NCRMD stand for in the context of legal defence?

    <p>Not Criminally Responsible on account of Mental Disorder</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the conditions of intoxication to their outcomes:

    <p>Mental disorder induction = Acquitted as NCRMD Prevents specific intent = Must be acquitted Falls short of intent prevention = Not a valid defence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must the threat of duress involve according to the common-law defense?

    <p>A threat of serious bodily harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Ruzic case established that duress can be claimed even if the threat is not immediate.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What test is used to determine whether an accused had a safe avenue of escape?

    <p>Modified objective test</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Supreme Court ruled that section 17 only applies to those accused persons who are charged with having __________ committed the offence.

    <p>actually</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the case with its ruling regarding duress:

    <p>Ruzic case (2001) = Threat must be present Paquette case (1976) = Common-law defense requirements apply to accomplices</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key requirement for claiming duress?

    <p>There must be a physical presence of the threat maker</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An individual who is a member of a conspiracy may invoke the defense of duress.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary limitation on the defense of duress according to section 17?

    <p>Accused must not be charged with certain serious offenses</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Regulatory Offences in Canada

    • Regulatory offences are governed by federal, provincial, or territorial legislation, differing from "true crimes" in the Criminal Code.
    • They deal with the enforcement of regulatory schemes overseeing legitimate activities like trade, commerce, advertising, and driving.
    • Regulatory offences often result in financial penalties for failing to meet a standard of reasonable care rather than implying moral culpability.

    Historical Context of Regulatory Offences

    • Courts formerly applied absolute liability, requiring only proof of the actus reus, without considering culpability.
    • Nowadays, courts allow defendants to plead due diligence, moving toward a "halfway house" approach that requires proving lack of negligence.
    • This change aims to distinguish between moral culpability (true crimes) and negligence concerning regulatory offences.

    Categories of Criminal Offences

    • Mens Rea Offences: The Crown must prove full intent for these offences.
    • Strict Liability Offences: The Crown doesn't need to prove intent though the accused can still raise a defence of due diligence.
    • Absolute Liability Offences: The Crown need not prove intent and the accused cannot use due diligence as a defence.

    Factors for Regulatory Liability Assessment

    • The overall structure of the legislation.
    • Nature/subject of the regulatory offence.
    • Penalty severity.
    • Precise wording of the legislation

    Courts' Decisions

    • In Wholesale Travel Group Inc. (1989), the court ruled that requiring due diligence did not invalidate the law.
    • Similar rulings avoid classifying regulatory offences as absolute liability cases, usually to preserve the constitutionality of the law in question.
    • The Court clarified that the imposition of absolute liability with the possibility of imprisonment would invalidate the law under the Charter, but it leaves open the question of whether this applies in general to default fines.

    The Judicial Process

    • The process starts with the police filing a complaint or investigating.
    • The suspect is either released or detained (with specific rules related to minors), given either an appearance notice or documents concerning the next appearance.
    • The court will decide on bail conditions if the suspect is arrested.

    The Role of the Prosecuting Attorney

    • The prosecutor is part of the process and evaluates the police investigation reports.
    • They decide if charges are warranted and what the investigation should focus on..
    • They consider the evidence and public interest in determining what course of action to take (file charges, or not).

    Plea Bargains and Settlements

    • Plea bargains (or negotiated settlements) enable flexibility in cases where the accused assesses the evidence and may choose a settlement with the prosecutor or by negotiation.
    • The settlement is always presented to and approved by a judge

    Preliminary Inquiry and Trial

    • A preliminary inquiry may be ordered for complex crimes (like murder) to determine if sufficient evidence exists to proceed to trial.
    • Trials are open to the public, and two parties are involved; the prosecution and defence.
    • The prosecution must convince a judge that the accused is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt."
    • The accused may plead guilty to all, or some of the charges, or may be acquitted.

    Sentencing

    • Sentences are decided by a judge and depend on factors like the seriousness of the crime, criminal record, proportionality, and rehabilitation.
    • A judge may impose a fine/combination of fines, or jail/conditional sentencing, or an absolute discharge with or without conditions.

    Appeals

    • Any party can appeal the judgment.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the nuances of regulatory offences in Canada, highlighting their differences from true crimes. It covers the historical context, legal definitions, and categories of such offences, along with their implications in terms of liability and penalties. Test your understanding of these important legal concepts.

    More Like This

    Regulatory Policy Flashcards
    9 questions

    Regulatory Policy Flashcards

    BeneficialThermodynamics avatar
    BeneficialThermodynamics
    Regulatory Policy Flashcards
    10 questions
    Criminal Law Chapter 6 - Regulatory Offences
    45 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser