15 Questions
What is a limitation of a legalistic approach in public inquiries?
Lack of empathy or inability to see things like normal people
What is crucial for determining whether an inquiry is effective?
The decision as to what to investigate and what questions to ask.
How long does a public inquiry typically take?
There is no set time, it can take a long time.
Why may judges not be effective at working with the press?
They may not be food at working with the press.
Who typically chairs a public inquiry?
Judges
What is a key concern about the legalistic approach in public inquiries, particularly when it is chaired by judges?
Lack of empathy or being out of touch with normal people.
What is a potential consequence of judges not being effective at working with the press during public inquiries?
Anxiety.
What is a significant factor in determining the scope of an inquiry?
The decision as to what issues should be looked at.
What is a characteristic of public inquiries in terms of their duration?
There is no set time.
What can be a limitation of having judges chair public inquiries?
They may not be able to see things like normal people.
What is a key factor in determining the scope of inquiry in a public inquiry?
The decision as to whether an inquiry is effective
What may be lacking in judges who chair public inquiries, leading to ineffective inquiry?
Empathy
What is a potential challenge for judges chairing public inquiries, particularly when interacting with the press?
Anxiety
What is a characteristic of the legalistic approach in public inquiries chaired by judges?
Lack of normal perspective
What is a limitation of having judges chair public inquiries, particularly in terms of their approach?
Legalistic approach
Explore the role of judges in public inquiries, the importance of empathy, and the scope of inquiries. Learn about the decision-making process and the challenges of working with the press.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
