Privileges in Intentional Torts
32 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What does the principle 'volente non fit injuria' imply regarding consent?

  • Only verbal consent is considered valid.
  • No harm can occur without consent. (correct)
  • Consent can be implied through silence.
  • Consent must be given in writing.
  • Which of the following best describes express consent?

  • Consent given verbally or in writing. (correct)
  • Agreement indicated by mutual conduct.
  • An agreement made through silence.
  • Assent shown through actions.
  • Under which condition can implied consent be assumed in a medical emergency?

  • The patient can consent verbally post-treatment.
  • The operation is optional and not life-threatening.
  • The patient is conscious and refusing treatment.
  • The physician believes treatment is needed without patient capability. (correct)
  • What invalidates consent given by an individual?

    <p>Misinterpretation of the act's consequences.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a condition for medical providers to act without consent?

    <p>The patient is able to fully communicate decisions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is implied consent by law typically associated with?

    <p>Emergency scenarios requiring immediate action.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of consent, what does duress refer to?

    <p>Physical threats affecting judgment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement is accurate regarding a competent adult's right to consent?

    <p>They retain the right to withdraw consent at any point, if feasible.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary condition under which a person can commit conversion or trespass to chattels?

    <p>The act is believed necessary to avoid public disaster.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under private necessity, what obligation does an actor have if damages are caused while acting for their own benefit?

    <p>Liable for any harm done to the possessor’s legally protected interests.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When can an officer or citizen arrest someone without a warrant for a misdemeanor?

    <p>If the misdemeanor was committed in their presence and they are in fresh pursuit.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conditions must be met for an arrest to be privileged under common law?

    <p>The officer must believe a felony has occurred.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a legal parent or guardian's right when using reasonable force or restraint?

    <p>To exercise reasonable restraint for the purpose of education.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be proven for a defense of justification in an intentional tort case?

    <p>The actions must prevent serious injury or property damage.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of public necessity, what is the liability status of those whose property is destroyed?

    <p>They have no right of recovery in the absence of legislation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the legal consequence if someone's entry onto another's property under private necessity results in damage?

    <p>The actor is liable for damages caused.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When can excessive force be legally problematic for an individual exercising discipline?

    <p>If the force exceeds what is necessary for control.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is true about citizen's arrests according to the content?

    <p>They are only lawful if the citizen directly witnesses the felony.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What determines the effectiveness of consent given while intoxicated?

    <p>It is ineffective if the person cannot express rational will.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under the Majority Rule regarding consensual criminal conduct, what entitles a plaintiff to damages?

    <p>Injury sustained during consensual activity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is generally required for informed consent in a medical context?

    <p>Surgeon disclosure of treatment risks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is necessary for a successful self-defense claim relating to reasonable force?

    <p>The force used must be proportionate to the threat.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the minority rule say regarding retreat in a self-defense situation?

    <p>Retreat is only necessary if it does not increase risk.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In relation to defenses applicable to property, when is the use of lethal force permissible?

    <p>Only when an assault is imminent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What can a shop owner do if they reasonably believe a theft has occurred?

    <p>Detain the person for a reasonable investigation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is true about the defense of others in tort law?

    <p>Conditions for reasonable belief may differ in courts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What constitutes public necessity in tort law?

    <p>Acts that promote public good, even if property is destroyed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens if a third party is injured while the defendant uses reasonable force in self-defense?

    <p>No liability arises if the force was reasonable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what condition may a person recover property they believe was wrongfully taken?

    <p>If they act within a reasonable time frame.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the effect of a reasonable mistake in the context of property defense?

    <p>It does not protect the actor in property defense.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the general exception pertaining to statutory rape in the context of consent?

    <p>Victims cannot give effective consent due to their age.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must a defendant prove when claiming self-defense?

    <p>The existence of a reasonable belief regarding threat.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Privileges in Intentional Torts

    • Consent: A valid defense to intentional torts, requiring voluntary agreement with sufficient mental capacity.
      • Express Consent: Direct, unequivocal verbal or written agreement.
      • Implied Consent: Consent inferred from conduct, actions, or inaction; can be implied by a course of conduct or relationship, or by law in emergencies where consent is impossible. Crucial in medical contexts; a patient's inability to consent, serious risk of delay, and reasonable expectation of consent are factors. If treatment is not necessary, no implied consent.
      • Consent Under Mistake, Misrepresentation, or Duress: Invalid consent if induced by duress, substantial mistake about the act or harm magnitude known to the other party, or induced by fraud.
      • Consent When Intoxicated: Effectiveness depends on the ability to express rational will.
      • Consent to Criminal Conduct: Majority rule: consent doesn't bar a tort claim. Minority rule: consent may be a defense unless the force exceeds that consented to. Consent to criminal conduct is often not a defense if the criminal statute is designed to protect a particular class. Informed consent mandates disclosure of risks for medical treatments.

    Self-Defense

    • Privilege: Use of reasonable force to defend against an imminent or actual harmful or offensive contact.
    • Reasonable Force: Proportional to the threat; only the necessary force to prevent harm.
    • Retaliation/Retreat: Retaliation, not privileged. No duty to retreat when the force used isn't likely to cause serious bodily harm; in jurisdictions with a minority rule, there might be a duty to retreat before using lethal force if it can be done safely.
    • Mistake and Injury to Innocent Third Parties: A reasonable belief in the threat, and reasonableness of force used, are crucial. If the force used is unreasonable intentionally or negligently, the defendant may be liable for injury to third parties.
    • Burden of Proof: The defendant must prove the existence of a threat, the reasonableness of the force used, and the need to retreat if possible.

    Defense of Others

    • Elements Similar to Self-Defense: Generally the same, with varying standards for reasonable belief.
    • Mistake: Simple reasonable belief standard (if defendant reasonably believed intervention was necessary, they're privileged even with a mistake) in some jurisdictions. In others, the defendant steps into the shoes of the person they are defending.

    Defense of Property

    • Reasonable Force: Owner permitted to use reasonable force, not lethal force (unless self-defense is also engaged)
    • Reasonable Mistake: Not a defense.
    • Ejection and Unreasonable Danger: Ejecting someone from property into unreasonable danger is not privileged.
    • Recovery of Property: Requires right to immediate possession, fresh pursuit, and reasonable force – deadly force not privileged unless the wrongdoer resists.
    • Shopkeepers' Privilege: Detaining a person for a reasonable investigation if a reasonable belief that theft occurred; jurisdiction standards vary on force, scope, time, and who can claim privilege.

    Necessity

    • Public Necessity: Absolute defense; no compensation for damage. Privilege to enter/remain where necessary to avert imminent public disaster.
    • Private Necessity: Defense, but the actor is liable for damage unless the threat was caused by the plaintiff's fault.

    Authority of Law

    • Warrant & Arrests: Using a warrant, or arresting without a warrant, with reasonable grounds, is privileged.
      • Arrest of Felony Suspects: Officers/citizens can arrest if a felony has occurred/is occurring, or if have reasonable grounds to believe one did.
      • Arrest of Misdemeanor: Officer when committed in presence, and citizens in breaches of the peace committed in presence.
    • Excessive Force: Liability for excessive force in any arrest.

    Discipline

    • Parental/Custodial Rights: Reasonable force and restraint. Partial extension to teachers.

    Justification

    • Reasonable Restraint: Preventing injury or interference with property (in lawful custody) is a defense. In situations not covered by other privileges, justification may be used as a defense, but must be based on fairness and not meet requirements of traditional defenses or privileges.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the key concepts surrounding consent as a defense in intentional torts. Learn about express and implied consent, the effects of duress, intoxication, and more on legal agreements. Test your understanding of the complexities involved in personal injuries and legal defenses.

    More Like This

    Consent Searches and Body-Worn Cameras
    54 questions
    Consent Decree and Legal Terms Quiz
    30 questions
    Consent and Sexual Assault Quiz
    3 questions
    Consent Knowledge Quiz
    5 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser