Political Propaganda in India

Controlling information flow, often through restricting access to media like websites and social media, to influence public opinion and suppress dissent.

Strategies used to spread specific ideas or views, often to promote a particular political agenda.

Propagandists use relatable figures, connect with specific groups, and emphasize morality to gain public trust and support for their message.

Using labels, like "anti-national," to discredit opponents and marginalize them in public discourse.

Using symbolic imagery, slogans, and catchy phrases to promote government agendas and foster unity.

Altering historical narratives to fit present-day political goals.

Temporarily restricting internet access, often during political unrest or conflict.

The increasing division of a society into distinct and opposing groups with conflicting perspectives and beliefs.

The way history figures are presented in school textbooks, often influenced by political ideologies and narratives of national unity.

Governments modifying historical accounts in textbooks to align with their political objectives and ideologies.

Using influential figures (like experts or scientists) to build credibility for policies and actions.

Linking policies or actions to cultural icons, national symbols, or historical figures to promote unity and support.

Using advertising to subtly promote policies or criticize opponents without explicit partisanship. An example is Amul's advertisements.

Methods used by governments to promote national unity, justify policies, and limit dissent. Includes censorship and emotional appeals.

Evaluating information with a critical eye, considering potential bias, and understanding propaganda techniques.

The process of constructing a shared national narrative and sense of belonging, often involving the manipulation of historical accounts.

Media ownership influences news reporting, often aligning coverage with owners' political or corporate interests.

Selective reporting of events, leading to polarized public opinion and deepened biases.

Media outlets controlled by the government, often used to prop up government agendas and suppress dissent.

Social media lets political parties directly engage with voters, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers.

Stories used to influence public opinion.

The ability to critically evaluate and understand news sources.

The use of media by the government to promote specific political ideas.

Artificial intelligence and bots play a significant role in information generation and dissemination, including spreading false information.

Holding media accountable to ensure public information integrity, especially considering financial interests.

Challenges to democratic engagement caused by the spread of misinformation online through tactics like trolls and bots.

Term describing the rapid spread of misinformation through WhatsApp in Indian politics, often promoted by political groups.

Increasing doubts about media integrity in India due to biased reporting and a lack of objectivity.

Media's vital function in democracies, including information dissemination and oversight of power, often viewed as a crucial partner for progress.

Media freedom, like citizens' rights, comes with responsibility, balancing the need for information with reasonable limitations.

The 1970s Emergency severely undermined civil liberties and freedom of expression, creating a negative impact on Indian history.

Nehru considered the Press a partner in governance with the responsibility to balance situational appropriateness and freedom.

Prioritizing shocking or exciting stories over factual reporting, often exaggerating events and using insensitive language.

Media, often influenced by pressure, promotes biased narratives that worsen societal divisions based on religion, ethnicity, or politics.

Governments use tactics like advertising deals to control media content and promote their agendas, often suppressing opposing viewpoints.

When media prioritizes profit or political favoritism, its ability to hold power accountable diminishes, leading to public skepticism and ignorance.

Biased media amplifies intolerance and disparities, negatively impacting marginalized communities through unfair portrayal and limited representation.

Political parties spread false or misleading information to discredit rivals, encouraging a culture of unfounded accusations and mistrust.

Media outlets accepting money from political parties to promote favorable narratives or suppress negative information, undermining journalistic integrity.

Paid news skews public opinion during elections, giving political entities unfair influence and potentially compromising electoral integrity.

Media outlets favoring specific viewpoints, often due to political influences or ownership structures, leading to biased coverage and skewed public perception.

Media's freedom from undue political pressure or financial dependence, allowing unbiased reporting and holding power accountable.

Methods used to manipulate public opinion, including biased information, emotional appeals, and spreading misinformation.

Financial reliance on government can lead to biased news coverage as outlets prioritize pleasing funders over truth.

Media outlets free from government control or financial influence, providing a more objective perspective.

A range of diverse media outlets with different viewpoints, essential for a vibrant democracy.