Pigouvian Taxes and Pollution Tax Concepts

Study Notes

A.C. Pigou argued that taxes could be used to mitigate externalities.
Pigouvian taxes are a financial penalty imposed on polluters.
The tax is based on the amount of pollution emitted.
Pigouvian taxes aim to eliminate the difference between Marginal Private Cost (MPC) and Marginal Social Cost (MSC).

Pollution taxes provide an incentive for producers to adopt less polluting technologies.
Firms will minimize their costs by choosing the level of waste discharge where the Marginal Cost of Control (MCC) equals the tax.
If the tax is lower than the MCC, it is cheaper for the firm to pollute and pay the tax.
If the tax is higher than the MCC, it is cheaper for the firm to clean the waste.
Firms will choose an emission level where their Marginal Abatement Cost (MAC) equals the tax.

The optimal tax rate (te) should be equal to the marginal cost of control (MCC) at the socially optimal level of waste discharge.
This level of waste discharge should also be equal to the marginal damage cost (MDC).
Government authorities set an effluent charge using a trial-and-error process, comparing the impact of the tax on emissions and abatement costs.
If the aggregate MAC function is known, setting the optimal tax level is easier.
Without knowing the MAC function, it is harder to determine the appropriate tax level.

Pollution taxes can minimize abatement costs and incentivize Research and Development (R&D).
Pollution taxes are less effective than command-and-control techniques in achieving a desired level of pollution due to uncertainties in determining the MAC function.

Marketable pollution permits grant firms the right to emit a specific amount of pollution.
Firms can buy and sell these permits.
This system can minimize total abatement costs and achieve a desired level of pollution.
The government determines the total allowable permits and the distribution mechanism.

Permits can be allocated based on historical pollution levels.
Trading permits allows for efficient allocation of emissions rights.
Firms with lower abatement costs will sell permits to firms with higher abatement costs.
This leads to an equilibrium where the marginal control costs of all firms are equal.
The total amount of pollution emitted equals the total permits.

Pollution subsidies provide a fixed amount of money to polluters for each unit of pollution reduced.
Polluters will reduce pollution to the point where the subsidy equals the marginal cost of abatement.
Subsidies may attract more polluters into the industry, potentially increasing overall pollution.

The firm producing paper has a marginal damage cost (MDC) of 100 - E and a marginal abatement cost (MAC) of 10 + 2E.
The optimal tax is equal to the level of emission where MDC = MAC.
To find the optimal tax, set MDC = MAC and solve for E.
The solution will then determine the optimal tax.

Polluter 1 has a MAC of 18 - E1 and Polluter 2 has a MAC of 12 - 2E2.
The unregulated level of pollution for each polluter is where their MAC equals zero.
To find the total emissions with a $4 tax, set each polluter's MAC equal to $4 and solve for their respective emissions.
The sum of the two emissions is the total emissions with the tax.

Podcast Beta