Philosophy of Science: Key Figures

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What distinguishes natural kinds from human kinds in research?

Human kinds are independent of human interpretation.

Natural kinds exist independently of our knowledge of them. (correct)

Human kinds are defined purely by biological characteristics.

Natural kinds require human intervention to exist.

Which approach suggests that knowledge is constructed through interactions with others?

Empiricism

Positivism

Natural science approach

Social constructionism (correct)

In the context of social sciences, what does the term 'double hermeneutic' refer to?

The mutual influence of understanding between individuals. (correct)

Single-sided interpretation of observable phenomena.

Independent understanding between the researcher and the subject.

The inability to interpret subjective accounts.

How does constructivism differ from social constructionism regarding knowledge?

Constructivism focuses on individual meaning-making. Signup and view all the answers

What is a major limitation noted regarding Kuhn's concept of paradigm shifts?

The concept lacks conceptual clarity. Signup and view all the answers

According to constructivism, how is knowledge built?

It is collaboratively constructed through social interactions. Signup and view all the answers

What characterizes the nature of social objects according to both constructivism and social constructionism?

They only have meaning through collective human interaction. Signup and view all the answers

In exploring psychological research, what issue arises due to the nature of human kinds?

Human actions can be misinterpreted due to their subjective nature. Signup and view all the answers

What does positivism assume about the nature of the world?

The world exists independently of us. Signup and view all the answers

Which reasoning process is NOT associated with Charles Sanders Peirce?

Reduction Signup and view all the answers

How does post-positivism differ from positivism?

Post-positivism acknowledges limitations in scientific findings. Signup and view all the answers

According to Karl Popper, what is required to disconfirm a universal hypothesis?

A single contrary observation. Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary focus of Thomas Kuhn's exploration of scientific paradigms?

The interconnected statements that define how science is practiced Signup and view all the answers

What is the main idea behind abduction as proposed by Peirce?

It generates a plausible hypothesis connecting observations to causes. Signup and view all the answers

What is Willard Quine's perspective on the scientific method?

It is theory-laden and influenced by prior beliefs. Signup and view all the answers

Which philosopher argued that scientific claims can be falsified as singular statements?

Karl Popper Signup and view all the answers

In what way does Lakatos expand on the ideas of Kuhn and Popper?

By categorizing knowledge claims into hardcore and auxiliary hypotheses Signup and view all the answers

What issue does post-positivism raise regarding the relationship between theory and observation?

Disconfirming data may indicate a problem with observations rather than the theory. Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'conditionality' refer to in Popper's philosophy?

The acceptance of temporary truths until proven otherwise. Signup and view all the answers

What does Kuhn suggest scientists do with their core theories?

They cling to them for as long as possible Signup and view all the answers

How do Popper and Kuhn differ in their understanding of what experiments target?

Popper believes they target core hypotheses while Kuhn views them as puzzles Signup and view all the answers

What does Imre Lakatos distinguish between in his discussion of scientific hypothesis?

Refutation and rejection of hypotheses Signup and view all the answers

What aspect of scientific progress do both Kuhn and Popper challenge?

The idea that science progresses solely through fact accumulation Signup and view all the answers

What does the 'positive heuristic' in Lakatos's theory refer to?

The drive of science to evolve and advance Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary focus of interpretivism in understanding human behavior?

The subjective experience and understanding of individuals Signup and view all the answers

Which perspective does the feminist approach primarily adopt in knowledge construction?

An insider's viewpoint Signup and view all the answers

How do feminist approaches view the data that is typically excluded from traditional knowledge?

As potentially more valid than included data Signup and view all the answers

What do post-positivistic epistemologies use in their research methods?

Both natural sciences methods and interpretive approaches Signup and view all the answers

What role does discourse play according to social constructionists?

It is considered an action and behavior that constructs reality Signup and view all the answers

Which statement accurately reflects the assumptions of interpretivism?

Human behavior is complex and shaped by individual perceptions Signup and view all the answers

What is a significant aspect of knowledge according to feminist approaches?

Knowledge is situated and contingent on context Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the perspective of discursive psychology?

A social constructionist perspective Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of auxiliary hypotheses in scientific research programs?

To address known anomalies and protect the hard core. Signup and view all the answers

Which characteristic must a scientific program exhibit to be considered progressive?

It consistently predicts empirical content that was previously unknown. Signup and view all the answers

What does the negative heuristic in scientific research primarily aim to achieve?

To prevent the falsification of the core tenets of a theory. Signup and view all the answers

How does post-positivism view knowledge in scientific inquiry?

Knowledge is reconstructive and can reinterpret past information. Signup and view all the answers

According to Khunian values, what function does a theory serve in scientific inquiry?

To isolate phenomena and prevent data confusion. Signup and view all the answers

What can be inferred about a research program that fails to explain anomalies?

It may be considered degenerating. Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following statements accurately describes the implications of scientific knowledge being temporally situated?

What is known today may be proven incorrect in the future. Signup and view all the answers

What happens when a scientific program produces competing claims to knowledge?

The programs may coexist, leading to diverse understanding. Signup and view all the answers

What does the principle of universalism in scientific values imply?

There should be a shared set of objective criteria for evaluating scientific ideas. Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is a characteristic of 'disinterestedness' in science?

Scientists should approach science with a sense of neutrality. Signup and view all the answers

In what way does modern psychology align with Popperian science?

It attempts to falsify the null hypothesis in its research. Signup and view all the answers

Which aspect undermines psychology's classification as a Kuhnian science?

Psychology has fragmented into numerous sub-disciplines without major shifts. Signup and view all the answers

How do modern psychologists generally view the use of p-values in research?

They treat p-values as arbitrary and question their efficacy in supporting theories. Signup and view all the answers

What is one criticism mentioned about psychologists regarding their scientific practices?

They engage in more debates about fundamentals than natural scientists. Signup and view all the answers

What does the concept of communalism in science advocate?

Scientific knowledge should be a shared resource accessible to all. Signup and view all the answers

What is a potential limit of psychology's use of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)?

NHST can yield misleading conclusions if p-values are interpreted incorrectly. Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Roger Bacon

A medieval Franciscan friar who promoted empirical observation, experimentation, systematic record-keeping, inductive reasoning, and an interdisciplinary approach to knowledge.
Advocated for naturalistic philosophy, asserting that empirical knowledge reveals the true nature of creation.
Identified three sources of knowledge: authority, reason, and experience.
Also proposed three purposes for science: discovering truth, providing moral and ethical guidance, and developing useful knowledge.

William of Occam

Known for Occam's razor, a principle suggesting choosing the simplest explanation among competing hypotheses.
Related to the representative heuristic and conjunction fallacy.

Isaac Newton

Founded physics as a distinct discipline, separating it from philosophy.
Emphasized empirical data collection and inductive reasoning.
Used large-scale observation in his work.

David Hume

Critiqued induction, highlighting problems with assuming that past events predict future outcomes.
Discussed issues of deductive reasoning, analytics, and a priori relation ideas and probable problems with inductive reasoning; synthetic a posteriori and matters of fact.
Introduced the availability heuristic, suggesting that people judge probabilities based on ease of recall of similar instances.

Auguste Comte

Credited with founding positivism, emphasizing empirical observation and scientific principles over theological or metaphysical speculation.
Positivism postulates realism (an independent world), empiricism (knowledge through observation), and induction (creating universal theories from observations).

Charles Sanders Peirce

A pragmatist who believed science advances through induction, deduction, and abduction.
Abduction is an explanatory process where conclusions don't necessarily follow from premises.
Emphasized reasoning that generates hypotheses to explain observations.

Post-Positivism

Acknowledges limitations in positivism, recognising that scientific findings may not have a direct correspondence with reality.
Focuses on the limitations of positivism.

Karl Popper

Proposed disconfirmation as a solution to the problem of induction (no observation can establish a universal truth).
Argued for conditional truth claims and conjectures, which are tested until found wrong
Emphasised the importance of falsifiability in scientific theories.
Discussed the nature of conjectures and refutations in the context of scientific theories

Willard Quine

Argued that the scientific method is theory-laden, meaning observations are influenced by existing theories.
Observations are not independent; they are impacted by the theory being studied.
The dependency of observations on theory can alter conclusions about a theory.

Thomas Kuhn

Explored scientific paradigms (networks of interconnected statements influencing how science operates).
Distinguished between normal science (where paradigms are unchallenged) and scientific revolutions (where paradigms are challenged and replaced).
Scientific revolutions occur because a new paradigm better explains anomalies in the old paradigm.
Discussed the importance of anomalies and paradigms in scientific progress.

Imre Lakatos

Expanded on Kuhn's work, proposing falsifiability within research paradigms.
Distinguished between the core tenets of a research paradigm and auxiliary hypotheses (conjectures derived from the core).
Argues that scientific progress is through development of research programs.
Pointed out the distinction between rejecting a theory and rejecting the theory (or observation methods)

Science as Post-Positivism

Knowledge is reconstructive, modifying previous knowledge rather than simply adding to it.
Emphasises the importance of recognising that knowledge is influenced by time, context, and competing evidence
The process of science involves different methods of knowing and interpretation

Scientific Values (Kuhn/Khunian)

Knowledge should be coherent and consistent with existing theories and evidence.
Order should be incorporated to make sense of observations and phenomena.
Findings should align with existing evidence and knowledge, extending existing theories.
Focus on the value of generating novel and applicable knowledge in practice.

Merton/Mertonian values

Originality: New findings should be presented
Universalism- criteria used to judge scientific ideas should be the same across everyone.
Communalism- knowledge is a shared resource to judge ideas.
Disinterestedness- scientists should be detached from their biases.
Skepticism- scientists should doubt everything.

Psychology as a science

Questions whether psychology fits the frameworks provided by Popper and Kuhn.
Explores alternatives to positivism (e.g. constructivism), focusing on individual interpretation of phenomena.
Challenges the assumption that data is independent from the theory that guides it.

Challenges the idea of objective truth, suggesting that reality is constructed through social interactions.
Focuses on the meanings individuals give to their actions and phenomena in their environments, rather than on an objective reality.

Interpretivism

Emphasises that behaviour is more than just external stimuli; it is influenced by internal factors (mind, mental life).
Focuses on individual and subjective ways of understanding the world.

Feminist Approach

Stems from the lack of women in traditional academic settings.
Challenges traditional knowledge by including diverse viewpoints.
Advocates for more nuanced, context-specific, and ethically aware methods of knowing.
Draws attention to the social impact/constructions of knowledge, particularly gender, culture, and history.

Applied Psychology

Often employs a case study approach.
Focuses on understanding individual subjective experiences in a context without necessarily generalising to broader populations.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Explore the contributions of prominent philosophers in the realm of science, including Roger Bacon, William of Occam, Isaac Newton, and David Hume. This quiz focuses on their fundamental ideas and principles related to empirical knowledge, reasoning, and the philosophy of science.