Podcast
Questions and Answers
What does the term 'inalienable' mean in the context of human rights?
What does the term 'inalienable' mean in the context of human rights?
- Rights that can never be taken away by anything or anyone. (correct)
- Rights that can be taken away by the government.
- Rights that are divisible and can be prioritized.
- Rights that are only enjoyed by people of western descent.
How are the various human rights described as being related to each other?
How are the various human rights described as being related to each other?
- Equal, meaning all people have the same rights regardless of their background.
- Indivisible, meaning they are all of equal importance.
- Both a and b. (correct)
- Interdependent and interrelated, meaning one right contributes to the full enjoyment of the others.
What is the purpose of the 'right to participation and inclusion' mentioned in the text?
What is the purpose of the 'right to participation and inclusion' mentioned in the text?
- To allow people to join in on matters that would affect their life and well-being. (correct)
- To hold the government accountable for protecting people's rights.
- To ensure that people are not discriminated against.
- To protect people from acts of bullying.
What is the definition of bullying provided in the text?
What is the definition of bullying provided in the text?
What is the main purpose of the human rights described in the text?
What is the main purpose of the human rights described in the text?
What is a key characteristic of Human Rights?
What is a key characteristic of Human Rights?
What is the primary focus of this module?
What is the primary focus of this module?
Which of the following rights is protected by the Bill of Rights mentioned in the text?
Which of the following rights is protected by the Bill of Rights mentioned in the text?
What is highlighted as equally important alongside expertise and knowledge in the text?
What is highlighted as equally important alongside expertise and knowledge in the text?
In terms of due process, who determines probable cause for search warrants according to the text?
In terms of due process, who determines probable cause for search warrants according to the text?