Petterson v. Pattberg Case Summary
33 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the original principal amount remaining unpaid on the mortgage on April 4, 1924?

  • $6,230
  • $250
  • $5,450 (correct)
  • $780
  • Petterson paid the quarterly installment due on April 25, 1924.

    True (A)

    Why did Pattberg refuse to accept payment from Petterson when he arrived to pay off the mortgage?

    Pattberg stated that he had already sold the mortgage.

    The property in question was located at 5301 ______ Avenue in Brooklyn.

    <p>Sixth</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the individuals with their roles in the case:

    <p>Petterson = Owner of the property and mortgagor Pattberg = Owner of the mortgage and mortgagee Plaintiff (Executrix) = Representative of Petterson's estate Third Person = Purchaser of the mortgage from Pattberg</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Petterson do to demonstrate his readiness to pay off the mortgage?

    <p>Exhibited cash to Pattberg. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Pattberg sold the bond and mortgage after Petterson attempted to pay it off.

    <p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the financial loss claimed by Petterson as a result of Pattberg's actions?

    <p>$780</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of contract did the defendant's letter propose to Petterson?

    <p>Unilateral Contract (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An offer for a unilateral contract can be withdrawn only after the requested act has been fully performed.

    <p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Williston, what must be given in response to a requested act in an offer?

    <p>that very act, and no other</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of contract law, the performance of the consideration is often considered a ______.

    <p>condition</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the legal scenarios with the principle of offer revocation they illustrate:

    <p>Bidder at a sheriff's sale revoking a bid = Revocation before property is 'struck down' Offer of reward revoked = Revocation before the requested act is done Broker commission offer revoked = Revocation before the land sale is effectuated Mortgage debt reduction offer revoked = Revocation before tender of payment</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Petterson intending to do when he approached the defendant?

    <p>Proffer performance by paying off the mortgage (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A tender of payment was actually made by Petterson before the defendant withdrew the offer.

    <p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What action by the defendant served as 'definite notice' to Petterson that the offered promise could not be performed?

    <p>selling the mortgage</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The case Dickinson v. Dodds illustrates that an offer can be withdrawn without formal notice if the offeree has ______ knowledge of acts inconsistent with the offer's continuation.

    <p>actual</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the final judgment in this case regarding the defendant's offer and Petterson's claim?

    <p>The court ruled against Petterson, finding no contract was ever made. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Judge Lehman, in his dissenting opinion, agreed with the majority opinion that no binding obligation was ever assumed by the defendant.

    <p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Judge Lehman, what principle of 'fundamental justice' is relevant to this case?

    <p>If a promisor is himself the cause of the failure of performance... he cannot take advantage of the failure.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Judge Lehman states that the defendant's promise, though lacking initial consideration, was made to obtain something the defendant ______.

    <p>desired</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Judge Lehman believe was the 'condition precedent' to the defendant's performance?

    <p>Payment of the mortgage by Petterson before the stipulated time. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the legal scholars with their concepts related to unilateral contracts and offers:

    <p>Williston = Revocation of offer before acceptance, precise act requested Langdell = Performance as a condition in offers Dickinson v. Dodds (case) = Informal revocation via knowledge of inconsistent acts Lehman, J. (dissenting) = Promisor causing failure of condition cannot take advantage</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The defendant's offer was made as an incentive for the plaintiff to pay the mortgage after the due date.

    <p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary point of contention regarding the defendant's agreement?

    <p>The defendant's promise was conditional upon their own performance. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What phrase used by the defendant is central to the court's interpretation of the agreement?

    <p>&quot;I agree to accept&quot;</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The plaintiff's offer to pay, combined with the intention and ability to do so, is considered sufficient. A formal ______ is rarely needed in business transactions.

    <p>tender</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The judges who concurred with Kellogg, J. are:

    <p>Cardozo, C.J., Pound, Crane, and O’Brien, JJ (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The dissenting opinion argued that the plaintiff had not fulfilled the necessary conditions for the defendant’s promise to be binding.

    <p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What action by the plaintiff did the court consider as fulfilling the defendant's request in the agreement?

    <p>The plaintiff's offer to pay</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following arguments with the corresponding parties:

    <p>Defendant = The act of payment required the defendant's assent, which was not given. Plaintiff = The defendant's promise was to accept payment, indicating a binding agreement. Court (Majority) = The plaintiff's offer to pay was sufficient to activate the defendant's promise.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What legal principle did the court invoke when evaluating the defendant's phrase "I agree to accept"

    <p>The concept of offer and acceptance (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The court referenced a case (Surace v. Danna) and the opinion of Judge ______ to support its reasoning.

    <p>Cardozo</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Petterson v. Pattberg Case Summary

    • Facts: John Petterson owed a mortgage to Zechariah Pattberg. Pattberg wrote Petterson offering to accept cash payment for the mortgage at a discounted price if paid by May 31, 1924. Petterson attempted to pay Pattberg on May, but Pattberg refused as he had sold the mortgage to a third party. Petterson sued.

    • Majority Opinion (Kellogg, J.): A unilateral contract requires a complete act of performance to be binding. Pattberg's offer was revocable until Petterson tendered payment. The offer was withdrawn before acceptance.

    • Dissenting Opinion (Lehman, J.): Pattberg's offer implied a commitment to accept payment if the payment was offered before May 31. The act of offering payment was acceptance of the unilateral contract. Rejecting payment after the offer constitutes a breach. Pattberg's refusal made performance impossible.

    • Key Legal Concepts: Unilateral contract, revocation of offer, tender of payment, implied commitment, condition precedent.

    Unilateral Contract

    • A unilateral contract is formed when one party makes a promise in exchange for the other party's performance of a specific act.
    • Unlike bilateral contracts (where mutual promises are exchanged), acceptance in a unilateral contract is not a promise but the completion of the requested act.
    • The offeror can revoke the offer at any time before the offeree completes the requested act.

    Revocation of Offer

    • An offer can be revoked before it is accepted.
    • Revocation can be communicated expressly or by actions inconsistent with the offer's continued existence. (e.g., selling the mortgage to someone else).

    Tender of Payment

    • Tender of payment is an unconditional offer of payment sufficient to satisfy a debt.
    • In this case, a formal tender wasn't necessary, but the offer to pay was enough for acceptance.

    Majority vs. Dissenting Views

    • Majority: Focuses on the offeror's right to revoke before complete performance of the requested act.
    • Dissenting: Emphasizes the implied commitment in Pattberg's offer and the impossibility of performance created by his refusal to accept the offer to pay.

    Significance of the Case

    • The case highlights the key distinctions between unilateral and bilateral contracts and the importance of explicit versus implied agreements in contract formation.
    • It illustrates how a party's behavior can impact contract formation and interpretation.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the landmark case of Petterson v. Pattberg, which addresses the nuances of unilateral contracts and the conditions under which an offer may be revoked. This quiz delves into the facts, majority, and dissenting opinions surrounding the dispute over a mortgage payment. Understand the implications of tender of payment and the concepts of offer and acceptance in contract law.

    More Like This

    Understanding Offers in Contract Law
    18 questions
    Unilateral Contract Law
    10 questions

    Unilateral Contract Law

    IntriguingLoyalty avatar
    IntriguingLoyalty
    Contract Law: Offers and Acceptance
    37 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser