Podcast
Questions and Answers
What must prior art demonstrate to be considered analogous to a claimed invention?
What must prior art demonstrate to be considered analogous to a claimed invention?
- It must be from a different field of endeavor.
- It must be from the same field of endeavor or relevant to the problem. (correct)
- It must teach the exact claimed invention.
- It must address the same problem as the claim.
Under what condition can a claim be deemed obvious according to 35 USC § 103?
Under what condition can a claim be deemed obvious according to 35 USC § 103?
- If the claimed invention is a mere modification of existing inventions.
- If the prior art has historical significance.
- If the prior art suggests or teaches the claimed invention. (correct)
- If the prior art teaches completely different methods.
What aspect can weaken a prima facie case of obviousness?
What aspect can weaken a prima facie case of obviousness?
- The existence of similar inventions in the same field.
- Prior art that teaches away from the desired result. (correct)
- The general availability of the invention.
- The inventor's public acknowledgment of other attempts.
In the case of Kimberly-Clark v. J&J, what was established about non-public work by another inventor?
In the case of Kimberly-Clark v. J&J, what was established about non-public work by another inventor?
What is necessary for the practical feasibility of an invention to be established?
What is necessary for the practical feasibility of an invention to be established?
Which of the following is necessary for an invention to be considered prior art under 102(g)?
Which of the following is necessary for an invention to be considered prior art under 102(g)?
What was the primary reason C's patent was deemed valid?
What was the primary reason C's patent was deemed valid?
What must a claimed invention demonstrate to achieve patentability, according to Great A & P Tea v. Supermarket Equipment Corp?
What must a claimed invention demonstrate to achieve patentability, according to Great A & P Tea v. Supermarket Equipment Corp?
The TSM test is used to evaluate what aspect of a claimed invention?
The TSM test is used to evaluate what aspect of a claimed invention?
Which of the following is NOT one of the factors considered in the TSM test?
Which of the following is NOT one of the factors considered in the TSM test?
In the context of patent claims, what is a key element that makes an invention not obvious?
In the context of patent claims, what is a key element that makes an invention not obvious?
According to Markman v. Westview, who is better suited to interpret terms of art in patent cases?
According to Markman v. Westview, who is better suited to interpret terms of art in patent cases?
What is the purpose of a Markman Hearing?
What is the purpose of a Markman Hearing?
Under which condition does Amendment VII ensure the right of trial by jury?
Under which condition does Amendment VII ensure the right of trial by jury?
What must be present for a party to be liable for Direct Infringement?
What must be present for a party to be liable for Direct Infringement?
What does the term 'Joint/Divided Infringement' refer to?
What does the term 'Joint/Divided Infringement' refer to?
According to the case Chef America v. Lamb Weston, how should claims be construed?
According to the case Chef America v. Lamb Weston, how should claims be construed?
What is a Declaratory Judgment in the context of patent law?
What is a Declaratory Judgment in the context of patent law?
Which of the following describes the liability for infringement under 35 USC 271?
Which of the following describes the liability for infringement under 35 USC 271?
What consequence arises if the reasonable construction of a patent claim leads to a nonsensical result?
What consequence arises if the reasonable construction of a patent claim leads to a nonsensical result?
What is required for a party to actively induce infringement of a patent?
What is required for a party to actively induce infringement of a patent?
What criteria must be met for factual compilations to be eligible for copyright protection?
What criteria must be met for factual compilations to be eligible for copyright protection?
In the Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands case, what is necessary for a design on a uniform to be copyrightable?
In the Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands case, what is necessary for a design on a uniform to be copyrightable?
What aspect made the menu command hierarchy in Lotus v. Borland uncopyrightable?
What aspect made the menu command hierarchy in Lotus v. Borland uncopyrightable?
Which of the following elements must a plaintiff prove to establish copyright infringement?
Which of the following elements must a plaintiff prove to establish copyright infringement?
Under 17 USC § 102 (B), which of these is not protected by copyright?
Under 17 USC § 102 (B), which of these is not protected by copyright?
What type of works are included under the definitions of 'pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works' in 17 USC § 101?
What type of works are included under the definitions of 'pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works' in 17 USC § 101?
What is a requirement for a piece of artwork or design to exist independently from its useful article, according to the two-part test established by the Supreme Court?
What is a requirement for a piece of artwork or design to exist independently from its useful article, according to the two-part test established by the Supreme Court?
What must the jury decide in determining copyright eligibility for a work?
What must the jury decide in determining copyright eligibility for a work?
Which of the following is not an example of a work that could be copyrightable?
Which of the following is not an example of a work that could be copyrightable?
Flashcards
Analogous prior art
Analogous prior art
Prior art must be from the same field of endeavor or related to the same problem the inventor is trying to solve.
Obviousness in patent law
Obviousness in patent law
The prior art must specifically guide an ordinary skilled person to the claimed invention.
Teaching away in prior art
Teaching away in prior art
Prior art that suggests a method might not work weakens the claim of obviousness.
Affirmation Standard
Affirmation Standard
Signup and view all the flashcards
Non-public work as prior art
Non-public work as prior art
Signup and view all the flashcards
Markman Hearing
Markman Hearing
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patent
Patent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Chef America v. Lamb Weston
Chef America v. Lamb Weston
Signup and view all the flashcards
Declaratory Judgment
Declaratory Judgment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Direct Infringement
Direct Infringement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Joint/Divided Infringement
Joint/Divided Infringement
Signup and view all the flashcards
35 USC 271
35 USC 271
Signup and view all the flashcards
Plain and Ordinary Meaning
Plain and Ordinary Meaning
Signup and view all the flashcards
Claim Construction
Claim Construction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Prior Art: Conception and Reduction to Practice
Prior Art: Conception and Reduction to Practice
Signup and view all the flashcards
What is Claim Construction?
What is Claim Construction?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patentable Invention: Beyond Combining Known Components
Patentable Invention: Beyond Combining Known Components
Signup and view all the flashcards
Obviousness: Graham Factors and the TSM Test
Obviousness: Graham Factors and the TSM Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
The TSM Test: Teaching, Suggestion, or Motivation
The TSM Test: Teaching, Suggestion, or Motivation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Court's Role in Claim Construction: Expertise in Technical Terms
Court's Role in Claim Construction: Expertise in Technical Terms
Signup and view all the flashcards
Obviousness Inquiry: Flexibility and Creativity
Obviousness Inquiry: Flexibility and Creativity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Copyrighting Facts?
Copyrighting Facts?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Copyrightable Cheerleading Outfit?
Copyrightable Cheerleading Outfit?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Two-Part Copyright Test
Two-Part Copyright Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Method of Operation?
Method of Operation?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proving Copyright Infringement
Proving Copyright Infringement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Uncopyrightable Ideas
Uncopyrightable Ideas
Signup and view all the flashcards
Examples of Copyrightable Works
Examples of Copyrightable Works
Signup and view all the flashcards
Copyrightable Art - Separation Test
Copyrightable Art - Separation Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Patents
- Patents protect the holder by allowing them to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing the patented invention.
- A patent typically lasts for approximately 20 years after the patent application date.
- Patents have three main components: description, figures, and claims.
- The description explains the invention.
- The figures show the invention.
- The claims define what the invention covers, and are crucial for determining whether something infringes on the patent.
Patent Prosecution
- Patent prosecution involves the interaction between a patent application and the USPTO (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) before a patent is issued or abandoned.
- The process often involves multiple rounds of argument and claim amendments.
35 U.S. Code § 102
- A patent may not be granted if the claimed invention was previously patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
- If an invention is used or sold publicly before the patent application, the inventor loses the right to a patent.
City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.
- If an invention is placed in public use for more than two years, the inventor has abandoned the right to a patent.
- A patent is still valid even if the invention was used for experimentation and testing purposes.
Diamond v. Chakrabarty
- A man-made organism is patentable subject matter.
Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc.
- A natural law or phenomenon must be sufficiently added upon or transformed to be patentable.
Bilski v. Kappos
- A method for protecting risk in purchase of energy commodities is not patentable.
- The machine-or-transformation test is an additional tool for determining patent eligibility of a process.
Alice v. CLS Bank
- A claim that involves an abstract idea is patentable only if it significantly modifies the idea for a new end.
- Claims that simply add a computer component to a pre-existing idea are not significant enough for patentability.
Patent Term Effective June 8, 1995; America Invents Act
- The patent term for applications filed before June 8, 1995 may be greater than 20 years depending on grant date.
- Applications filed after June 8, 1995 have a fixed 20-year term from the filing date.
- Prior to the America Invents Act, the first inventor, not the first filer, received the patent.
- The America Invents Act changed this to the first filer receiving the patent.
Brenner v. Manson
- A claimed process is not patentable if it does not provide a present, specific benefit for society.
In re Fisher
- A claimed invention must exhibit a significant, presently available, well-defined, and particular benefit to the public.
- Speculative uses are not enough for patentability
In re Clay
- Prior art is considered analogous if it is from the same field of endeavor, regardless of the problem being addressed.
- If prior art isn't in the same field of endeavor, it must still be relevant to the inventor's problem.
Kimberly-Clark v. Johnson & Johnson
- The inventor's knowledge of another inventor's non-public work does not automatically make it prior art.
- The work must be fully realized and functional.
Great A&P Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp
- Mere extension of an existing element in a product is unlikely to be considered a patentable invention.
- A new invention must provide an improvement that rises above the current state of the art.
KSR v. Teleflex
- A claimed invention is obvious if a skilled person would predict it based on prior art principles. Combining known elements often does not constitute an invention.
Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International
- The Supreme Court refined how patent law interprets claims related to abstract ideas.
Trade Secrets
- Trade secrets are confidential information that has economic value and is kept secret by the owner.
- They can be protected by state and federal (e.g., Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 laws).
Copyright
- Copyright protects original works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression.
- The copyright is generally granted automatically to the creator upon creation of the work.
- Copyright protection generally lasts for life of the author plus 70 years.
- Copyright holders have exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, display, and create derivative works of the protected material.
- Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted works for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.
Trademark
- A trademark is a distinctive symbol, design, or phrase, legally registered to represent a brand and distinguish it from others.
- Trademarks protect the source of products from confusion.
- A trademark can be a word, phrase, symbol, design or a combination.
- Trademarks need to be used in commerce to qualify for protection. Not all trademarks are registered.
- General terms cannot be trademarks (e.g., "pencil" or "car”).
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.