Negligent Misrepresentation in Kirimu Estate (UG) Ltd.v.K.G.Korde
10 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What kind of mistake is characterized by a situation where one party is mistaken as to the identity of the other party, induced by fraudulent misrepresentation?

  • Common mistake
  • Unilateral mistake (correct)
  • Bilateral mistake
  • Mutual mistake
  • In the case of Raffle v. Wichelhause, what was the main reason the contract was deemed void due to mutual mistake?

  • Different shipment dates
  • Two ships with the same name at Bombay port (correct)
  • Incorrect shipping port
  • Ambiguity in contract terms
  • How is unilateral mistake different from mutual mistake in contract law?

  • In unilateral mistake, both parties are aware of the mistake.
  • Mutual mistake requires fraudulent intent.
  • Unilateral mistake involves fraudulent misrepresentation. (correct)
  • Mutual mistake involves only one party being mistaken.
  • What does a party need to establish to prove a contract is void for unilateral mistake caused by fraudulent misrepresentation?

    <p>That they dealt with someone other than who they intended to deal with, and that person was aware of it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did the buyer refuse to take delivery of the cotton in the Raffle v. Wichelhause case?

    <p>The buyer intended to receive cotton from a different ship.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what circumstance does unilateral mistake in contract law often lead to a dispute?

    <p>When the mistaken party takes goods without knowing the fraud.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What factor contributes to making a contract void for unilateral mistake?

    <p>The fraudulent intent of one party.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does a party need to prove in a unilateral mistake dispute regarding fraudulent misrepresentation?

    <p>Dealing with someone other than who they intended, and that person's awareness of this fact.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is crucial in proving a contract void for unilateral mistake resulting from fraudulent misrepresentation?

    <p>You must prove you dealt with a different person than you intended and that person was aware of it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes bilateral mistake from unilateral mistake in contract law?

    <p>Bilateral mistake occurs when both parties are mistaken about each other's identity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Loss of Financial Nature

    • Kirimu Estate (UG) Ltd. v. K.G. Korde: plaintiff company sued defendant lawyer for negligent misrepresentation, resulting in a loss of financial nature due to overvaluation of land.

    Types of Mistakes

    • Two types of mistakes: mistake of law and mistake of fact
    • Mistake of law: does not affect a contract, except for mistake of foreign law
    • Mistake of fact: affects contractual relationships, an erroneous assumption or misapprehension of a fact or factual situation

    Operative Mistakes

    • Common mistake: both parties make the same mistake about the existence or ownership of the subject matter
    • Common mistake renders a contract void in two circumstances:
      • Cases of Res Exinta: subject matter does not exist (e.g., Couturier V. Hastle, Lessie Anderson V. Vallabdos Khalidas Company)
      • Cases of Res Sua: parties are mistaken about the ownership of the subject matter (e.g., Bingham V. Bingham)

    Mutual Mistake

    • A mistake about the subject matter of the contract
    • Arises when parties misunderstand each other or are at cross-purposes, resulting in a lack of consensus ad idem
    • Example: Raffle V. Wichelhause, where parties misunderstood the identity of the ship carrying the cotton

    Unilateral Mistake

    • A mistake about the identity of one of the parties to the contract
    • Only one party is mistaken, and the mistake is induced by the other party
    • Arises when a fraudulent person misrepresents their identity to obtain goods or favorable terms
    • Original owner is entitled to the goods or their value by establishing that the contract was void for unilateral mistake

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore a case study involving negligent misrepresentation in Kirimu Estate (UG) Ltd.v.K.G.Korde, where a lawyer provided a valuation far above market value without proper assessment. Learn about the consequences and legal implications of negligent misrepresentation.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser