Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App
Questions and Answers
In the case of The Wagon Mound (No. 2), the Privy Council ruled that the defendant was not liable for damages because:
In the case of The Wagon Mound (No. 2), the Privy Council ruled that the defendant was not liable for damages because:
- the plaintiff was also partially responsible for the damage
- the defendant had a duty of care towards the plaintiff
- the damage caused was not reasonably foreseeable (correct)
- the defendant had taken all necessary precautions to prevent the damage
The concept of Negligence in law primarily revolves around:
The concept of Negligence in law primarily revolves around:
- breach of duty of care owed to others (correct)
- strict liability for any harm caused
- contractual obligations
- intentional harm caused to others
The legal principle of 'duty of care' is based on:
The legal principle of 'duty of care' is based on:
- intention to cause harm
- foreseeability of harm to others (correct)
- contractual obligations
- strict liability for any harm caused
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
