Assault and Battery
8 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which scenario exemplifies indirect application of force as defined in the context of battery? There are 2 correct options.

  • A defendant shoves a person in a queue, causing a domino effect. (correct)
  • A defendant gives an unwanted kiss to someone.
  • A defendant drives over a victim's foot without intending to harm them. (correct)
  • A defendant punches a victim directly in the face.
  • What is sufficient for establishing the actus reus of battery? Two correct.

  • Consent from the victim prior to the interaction.
  • The victim's acknowledgment of feeling the force.
  • Direct physical contact with the victim's body. (correct)
  • Application of force through an intermediary or causing harm indirectly. (correct)
  • In the case of R v Thomas, what was determined regarding touching clothing?

  • Intent behind touching clothing is essential for a battery charge.
  • Only direct skin-to-skin contact constitutes battery.
  • Touching clothing can be sufficient for establishing battery. (correct)
  • Touching clothing does not count as a battery under any circumstances.
  • What outcome resulted from Haystead v DPP regarding indirect force?

    <p>The defendant was found guilty for the battery of the baby through indirect force. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary distinction between assault and battery in legal terms?

    <p>Assault refers to the threat of harm, whereas battery involves actual harm. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following correctly describes the actus reus of assault?

    <p>Causing someone to perceive an imminent threat of unlawful force. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under which legislative framework is common assault charged?

    <p>s.39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement about non-fatal offences against the person is true?

    <p>They include offences that involve threats as well as physical harm. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Non-Fatal Offences Against The Person

    • A range of offences where a person is harmed but not killed.
    • Offences are graded based on the severity of harm and the defendant's intent.
    • All offences have actus reus, mens rea, and charging guidelines.
    • Ensure the victim is not dead when answering exam questions.

    Common Assault

    • A common law offense, not defined by statute, but charged under s.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988.
    • Refers to both assault and battery.
    • Often charged together as “common assault.”

    Assault

    • Refers to a technical assault, where no physical contact occurs.

    Actus Reus of Assault

    • Causing a person to apprehend the immediate application of unlawful force.

    Battery

    • The actus reus of battery is the application of unlawful force on another.
    • Force can be direct (e.g., punching) or indirect (e.g., driving over someone's foot).
    • Indirect battery involves force applied to one person, causing force to another (e.g., pushing someone into another person).
    • Touching clothes can be sufficient.
    • Unwanted affection (e.g., a kiss) can satisfy the actus reus of battery.

    Actus Reus of Battery

    • The application of unlawful force on another.

    Actual Bodily Harm (ABH)

    • Caused by an assault.
    • Injury must be more than trivial and insignificant.
    • Includes recognized clinical conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety).
    • Fear or upset is insufficient for ABH.
    • CPS Charging Guidelines focus on injuries requiring significant medical intervention or lasting effects.

    Mens Rea of ABH

    • The mens rea (guilty mind) for battery is also sufficient for ABH.

    Charging and Sentencing of ABH

    • Charged under s.47 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861.
    • Maximum sentence is seven years imprisonment.
    • Triable either way (Magistrates' or Crown Court).

    Defenses to Assault and Battery

    • Consent: Consent can be a defense, but not for inherently violent acts (e.g., sadomasochism).
    • Horseplay: Rough behavior between friends can be consented to, but injuries must be incidental to the intended activity.
    • Sexual Relations: Consent is valid for sexual activity that is not inherently violent.
    • Wilson (1996): The state should not interfere with consenting adults' sexual activity.
    • Brown: Sadomasochistic acts are against public interest and cannot be consented to.
    • Dica: ABH caused recklessly during consensual sexual activity, where harm was not intentional, may still be a crime.
    • Slingsby: Consent is valid if neither party contemplates ABH resulting from the act.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    More Like This

    Assault and Battery Quiz
    11 questions

    Assault and Battery Quiz

    SelectiveEuphoria avatar
    SelectiveEuphoria
    Assault and Battery Laws Quiz
    11 questions
    Assault and Battery
    5 questions

    Assault and Battery

    HappierVolcano avatar
    HappierVolcano
    Assault and Battery in Healthcare Ethics
    12 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser