Podcast
Questions and Answers
What primary issue led to the near miss incident involving hot work on the vessel?
What primary issue led to the near miss incident involving hot work on the vessel?
- Lack of proper tools for the hot work
- Excessive supervision of the cutting task
- Unawareness of the location of the electrical cables
- Inadequate risk perception and communication about the task (correct)
Which safety control was notably absent during the hot work process?
Which safety control was notably absent during the hot work process?
- First aid kit available on site
- Fire watcher in the vicinity (correct)
- Proper signage indicating hot work
- Personal protective equipment for the workers
What assumption did the foreman make that contributed to the incident?
What assumption did the foreman make that contributed to the incident?
- That all personnel were trained in fire safety
- That the work could proceed without notifying the crew
- That the cutting task was covered under existing safety protocols for the welding area (correct)
- That the metal stump posed no immediate risk
What factor contributed to the inadequate pre-job planning for the hot work activity?
What factor contributed to the inadequate pre-job planning for the hot work activity?
What was a direct consequence of the sparks and slag falling through the hole in the deck?
What was a direct consequence of the sparks and slag falling through the hole in the deck?
Flashcards
Hot Work Near Miss
Hot Work Near Miss
A near miss occurred during hot work when sparks and slag fell from the main deck onto critical equipment and a thruster room below, highlighting the importance of thorough risk assessments and communication.
Inadequate Risk Assessment
Inadequate Risk Assessment
The contractor failed to assess the worksite conditions below the deck and did not understand the working environment in the surrounding area. No risk assessment was conducted, leading to inadequate safety measures.
Inadequate Communication
Inadequate Communication
No proper communication was established during the PTW application. No permission was sought before starting hot work, and assumptions were made that the existing permit covered the surrounding area.
Inadequate Pre-Job Planning
Inadequate Pre-Job Planning
Signup and view all the flashcards
Limited Permit Scope
Limited Permit Scope
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Hot Work Permit to Work Boundary Limit
- A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor removed a metal stump, using a cutting torch and grinding disc, on a vessel's main deck.
- Sparks and slag from the cutting process fell into a hole in the deck and onto scaffolding boards, and a 600V HV electrical cable.
- There were burn and scuff marks on the cable.
- Vessel engine room crew noticed falling sparks and stopped the work immediately.
- No fire watcher was present.
What Went Wrong
- Inadequate risk perception: The contractor didn't assess the worksite conditions below the deck, or the conditions in the area surrounding the work. No risk assessment was conducted.
- Inadequate controls were in place.
- Inadequate communication: The Permit to Work application did not detail the work being performed.
- No permission was sought for hot work on the stump.
- Incorrect assumptions were made about the scope of the hot work permit.
Actions and Recommendations
- Review and update training materials to ensure all aspects of Permit to Work (PTW) requirements are captured.
- Ensure adequate training for third-party contractors regarding the PTW system.
- Review and update pre-job planning; hazard identification; job site inspections; and readiness plans before issuing a PTW.
- Ensure all crew are informed about active PTWs.
- Review task risk assessments to capture lessons learned from incidents.
- Ensure adequate supervision at the site.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
