24 Questions
What is the primary reason micro-level prejudice reduction strategies may be ineffective on their own?
connected to wider society low status/disadvantage
What is the underlying basis of prejudice and discrimination, according to the text?
real intergroup relations
How can collective action facilitate social change, according to the text?
by creating and facilitating the conditions under which such action can take place
What is the ultimate challenge for reducing prejudice and discrimination, according to the text?
creating and facilitating the conditions under which collective action can take place
How can self-categorization at a superordinate level of identity contribute to reducing prejudice and discrimination?
by recognizing subgroup identities while categorizing at a higher level
What is the limitation of intergroup cooperation as a strategy for reducing prejudice and discrimination?
it may not always be a viable option
What is the relationship between the historical experiences of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people and the present-day social and economic outcomes?
the historical experiences have shaped the present-day outcomes
What is the author's perspective on the role of government authorities in addressing prejudice and discrimination?
they have a role to play in facilitating social change
What is the relationship between collective guilt and racist attitudes towards Indigenous Australians, according to the study in Australia?
Higher levels of collective guilt are associated with more favourable attitudes towards Indigenous Australians.
How did the in-group privilege frame influence participants' expression of collective guilt, compared to the out-group disadvantage frame?
Participants in the in-group privilege frame expressed higher levels of collective guilt (M = 4.68) than those in the out-group disadvantage frame (M = 3.95).
What is the relationship between collective guilt and support for compensatory actions towards Indigenous Australians?
Higher levels of collective guilt are related to stronger support for compensatory actions.
According to the study in the U.S.A., what is the relationship between collective guilt and racist attitudes?
Higher levels of collective guilt are associated with lower levels of racist attitudes.
What is the significance of collective memories in shaping attitudes towards Australia Day or Invasion Day?
Recognition of colonial history is an important aspect of collective memories, influencing attitudes towards Australia Day or Invasion Day.
How does social identification theory relate to the concept of collective guilt?
Social identification theory suggests that individuals' group memberships influence their attitudes and behaviors, including feelings of collective guilt.
What is the Minimal Group Paradigm, and how does it relate to collective guilt?
The Minimal Group Paradigm is a phenomenon where individuals quickly form groups and exhibit in-group favoritism, even when group membership is arbitrary, which can lead to collective guilt.
How does collective guilt differ from collective shame, and what are the implications for intergroup attitudes?
Collective guilt focuses on particular harmful actions, while collective shame involves a negative evaluation of the entire group; collective guilt is more likely to lead to constructive actions to repair harm.
What is the primary focus of the Minimal Group Study in the Netherlands, and what two conditions were group members told about previous group members' treatment of an out-group?
The primary focus of the Minimal Group Study is to explore collective guilt, and group members were told that previous group members had been consistently fair or consistently unfair in their treatment of an out-group.
What is the relationship between level of social identification and collective guilt, as found in the Minimal Group Study?
The level of social identification is positively related to collective guilt, meaning that the more individuals identify with their group, the more collective guilt they experience.
What is the concept of relative in-group advantage, and how is it measured in the study conducted in Australia?
Relative in-group advantage refers to the perceived advantage of one's own group relative to another group, and in this study, it was measured by asking European-Australians if they thought non-First Nation Australians were advantaged or disadvantaged.
What is the relationship between collective guilt and intergroup comparisons, as illustrated in the graph?
The graph shows that collective guilt is higher when individuals perceive that their in-group is advantaged and the out-group is disadvantaged, and lower when individuals perceive that both groups are equal or the out-group is advantaged.
What is the primary focus of the study conducted in the USA, and how is in-group privilege and out-group disadvantage manipulated?
The primary focus of the study is to explore collective guilt and shame, and in-group privilege and out-group disadvantage were manipulated by asking participants to consider statements about White privilege and Black disadvantage.
What is the role of social identification in promoting collective guilt, and how does it relate to intergroup comparisons?
Social identification plays a crucial role in promoting collective guilt, and it is influenced by intergroup comparisons, such that individuals who strongly identify with their group are more likely to experience collective guilt when they perceive that their group is advantaged and the out-group is disadvantaged.
What is the significance of collective guilt in promoting positive social change, and how can it be used to address issues of racism and privilege?
Collective guilt is significant in promoting positive social change, as it can motivate individuals to take action to address past injustices and promote greater equality, and it can be used to address issues of racism and privilege by acknowledging and addressing the harm caused by these systems.
What is the relationship between collective guilt and shame, and how do they relate to intergroup comparisons and social identification?
Collective guilt and shame are closely related, and both are influenced by intergroup comparisons and social identification, such that individuals who strongly identify with their group and perceive that their group is advantaged and the out-group is disadvantaged are more likely to experience both collective guilt and shame.
Study Notes
Collective Guilt and Intergroup Attitudes
- Higher levels of collective guilt are associated with lower levels of racist attitudes.
- In a study in the U.S.A., participants who expressed higher levels of collective guilt had lower levels of racist attitudes.
- In Australia, collective guilt was associated with more favorable attitudes towards Indigenous Australians.
Predicting Racist Attitudes
- A community sample in Australia found that collective guilt was associated with lower levels of negative attitudes towards Indigenous Australians.
- Factors measured included gender, education level, political position, empathic concern, and affective and cognitive perspective-taking.
Compensation and Collective Guilt
- In two studies in Australia, higher levels of collective guilt were associated with stronger support for compensatory actions towards Indigenous Australians.
Australia Day or Invasion Day?
- Collective guilt was related to recognition of colonial history and past injustices towards Indigenous Australians.
Prejudice Reduction and Social Change
- Micro-level prejudice reduction strategies may be ineffective on their own and require broader social and political action to create change.
- Collective action and social change can involve changing material relations between groups.
Changing Material Relations
- Prejudice and discrimination have their basis in real intergroup relations and can be reduced through cooperation for a superordinate goal or recognizing subgroup identities.
- Changing material relations between groups may be necessary to reduce prejudice and discrimination.
Collective Guilt and Minimal Group Study
- A study in the Netherlands found that group members can feel collective guilt when told that their in-group had treated an out-group unfairly.
Minimal Group Study
- The study found that level of social identification was positively related to collective guilt.
- Group bias condition was related to collective guilt, with those in the low group bias condition feeling less guilt than those in the high group bias condition.
Collective Guilt and Intergroup Comparisons
- A study in Australia found that perceived relative advantage among European-Australians was related to collective guilt.
- Collective guilt was highest when the in-group was perceived as advantaged and the out-group was disadvantaged.
This quiz explores the concept of collective guilt in the context of social psychology, using the Minimal Group Study in the Netherlands as a case study.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
