Medical Research Ethics Quiz

An ethics committee that reviews research involving human subjects to ensure ethical conduct and protect participant safety.

A type of research protocol that involves procedures or rules of behavior imposed on participants, often involving interventions or testing.

A research protocol that does not involve invasive procedures or rules of behavior imposed on participants. It may involve data collection, surveys, or retrospective analysis.

The principle stating that the well-being and interests of research participants should take precedence over any other considerations.

A set of ethical guidelines for human experimentation established after the Nuremberg Trials. It emphasizes voluntary participation, informed consent, and the right to withdraw from research.

Potential risks to participants' physical or emotional well-being during research. This includes the potential for physical harm, discomfort, psychological stress, or emotional distress.

The process of reviewing research protocols to assess potential risks and benefits to human participants, ensuring ethical conduct, and protecting their well-being.

The process of reviewing research proposals to ensure ethical conduct and protect the well-being of participants.

Analyzing how a technology impacts various aspects, taking into account its positive and negative sides, direct and indirect consequences, and effects on different individuals and groups.

A committee responsible for reviewing research proposals and ensuring ethical conduct in research involving human subjects.

Identifying the core values that are at play when evaluating a technology, for example, justice, autonomy, or privacy.

The principles and guidelines that govern the ethical conduct of research involving human subjects.

Understanding the potential positive and negative consequences of using a technology.

The influence of international actors and organizations on the development of research ethics governance in various countries.

The impact of technology on different levels: individual, social, and societal.

The tensions and conflicts that arise when implementing research ethics governance in specific national contexts.

Explicitly acknowledging the values that guide technological development and use, ensuring ethical considerations are prioritized.

The impact of political and societal factors on the interpretation and implementation of research ethics regulations.

A model of research ethics governance that emphasizes centralized control by the state rather than independent ethical review committees.

A model of research ethics governance primarily driven by market logic and commercial interests.

The ongoing evolution and adaptation of research ethics governance in response to changing societal and technological landscapes.

The need for a broader and more inclusive representation of diverse geographical contexts in the study of research ethics.

A structured relationship where one individual provides guidance, support, and knowledge to another who is seeking to develop their skills and expertise.

The tension that exists between collaborating with others and competing for recognition and resources in scientific research. It is particularly relevant in peer review processes where researchers evaluate each other's work.

A process used to evaluate the quality and originality of research papers and grant proposals. Researchers assess each other's work, ensuring scientific rigor and upholding ethical standards.

A set of ethical principles and practices that guide researchers in conducting their work with integrity and responsibility. It emphasizes honesty, accuracy, transparency, and adherence to scientific methods.

A type of research ethics framework that focuses on broad principles and positive research behaviors. It emphasizes integrity, reliability, objectivity, fairness, and responsibility in scientific practice.

A principle in research ethics that emphasizes openness, transparency, and collaboration in sharing research findings and data. It encourages researchers to make their results accessible to others to promote scientific advancement.

A type of scientific misconduct that involves intentionally falsifying, fabricating, or plagiarizing research data or findings. It undermines the integrity of scientific research and erodes public trust.

A national body established in Denmark to investigate and handle cases of scientific misconduct. It aims to promote good scientific practices and ensure accountability in research.

An international commission formed by the German Research Council to address issues related to professional self-regulation in science. It focuses on maintaining ethical standards and promoting responsible research practices.

A new approach to ethics that focuses on guiding the responsible integration of technology into society, rather than simply judging its acceptability.

Ethics that considers the potential consequences of technology for various aspects of society, such as education, healthcare, and law enforcement.

A process where stakeholders engage in discussion and deliberation to understand and address the ethical implications of technology.

The idea that ethical frameworks themselves evolve in response to technological advancements.

An ethical approach that emphasizes the need to start with concrete technologies and their specific effects on society, rather than making generalizations about technology as a whole.

The central question in guidance ethics, focusing on how a technology can be responsibly integrated into society instead of simply accepting or rejecting it.

The process of examining the possible effects and consequences of a technology, considering its potential benefits and risks.

The core values that are at stake when considering the ethical implications of technology.

The understanding of privacy evolves in relation to changing technologies and the shifting boundaries between private and public spaces.

Ethics that stems from within the technological context itself, rather than being imposed from outside.