Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which element is crucial for establishing evident premeditation in a criminal act?
Which element is crucial for establishing evident premeditation in a criminal act?
- The offender acted impulsively without considering the consequences.
- The offender immediately regretted the action after committing the crime.
- The offender was provoked into committing the act due to emotional distress.
- The offender demonstrated sufficient time to contemplate the criminal intention and formulate an execution plan. (correct)
How do craft, fraud, and disguise primarily function in the execution of a crime?
How do craft, fraud, and disguise primarily function in the execution of a crime?
- By employing brute physical force to overpower the victim.
- By utilizing intellectual or mental trickery to carry out the crime. (correct)
- By openly declaring the intent to commit a crime, thus creating fear.
- By relying on chance and unplanned opportunities.
In the context of 'superior strength or means to weaken defense,' what constitutes an 'unfavorable inequality of forces'?
In the context of 'superior strength or means to weaken defense,' what constitutes an 'unfavorable inequality of forces'?
- The victim unexpectedly uses a hidden weapon to defend themselves.
- A fair fight where both parties have equal chances of winning.
- A competitive sporting event with clearly defined rules and referees.
- A disparity in age, size, or strength that significantly disadvantages the victim. (correct)
What critical evidence would support the claim of 'superior strength or means to weaken defense' in a criminal investigation?
What critical evidence would support the claim of 'superior strength or means to weaken defense' in a criminal investigation?
What is the primary objective of employing means to weaken a victim’s defense?
What is the primary objective of employing means to weaken a victim’s defense?
Which of the following is the MOST accurate definition of conspiracy in the context of felony commission?
Which of the following is the MOST accurate definition of conspiracy in the context of felony commission?
A person decides to commit treason and discusses the plan with a friend, seeking their help. According to the provided material, this scenario BEST describes:
A person decides to commit treason and discusses the plan with a friend, seeking their help. According to the provided material, this scenario BEST describes:
Under what condition is a person performing an act considered free from both criminal and civil liability, thus recognizing the non-existence of the crime?
Under what condition is a person performing an act considered free from both criminal and civil liability, thus recognizing the non-existence of the crime?
What is the MOST critical element that MUST be present for a claim of self-defense to be valid?
What is the MOST critical element that MUST be present for a claim of self-defense to be valid?
Which scenario BEST illustrates 'imminent' unlawful aggression?
Which scenario BEST illustrates 'imminent' unlawful aggression?
Which scenario exemplifies a situation where proximate cause is absent?
Which scenario exemplifies a situation where proximate cause is absent?
In determining 'reasonable necessity' in self-defense, which factor is LEAST likely to be considered by the courts?
In determining 'reasonable necessity' in self-defense, which factor is LEAST likely to be considered by the courts?
What constitutes 'lack of sufficient provocation' from the perspective of the person defending themselves?
What constitutes 'lack of sufficient provocation' from the perspective of the person defending themselves?
What is the critical distinction between a frustrated felony and an attempted felony?
What is the critical distinction between a frustrated felony and an attempted felony?
An individual intends to poison their neighbor but mistakenly uses sugar instead of poison. Which of the following legal concepts applies?
An individual intends to poison their neighbor but mistakenly uses sugar instead of poison. Which of the following legal concepts applies?
If a person defends a relative against an attack, and the relative initiated the provocation, what condition MUST be met for the defense to be considered justified?
If a person defends a relative against an attack, and the relative initiated the provocation, what condition MUST be met for the defense to be considered justified?
On what legal principle is the justification for defending a relative PRIMARILY based?
On what legal principle is the justification for defending a relative PRIMARILY based?
Which element is NOT a requirement for an act to be considered an impossible crime?
Which element is NOT a requirement for an act to be considered an impossible crime?
In which stage of execution is an offender considered to have lost control over their actions?
In which stage of execution is an offender considered to have lost control over their actions?
A man sees his brother being attacked and intervenes, causing serious injury to the attacker in the process. Which factor would MOST heavily influence whether his actions are considered a justifiable defense of a relative?
A man sees his brother being attacked and intervenes, causing serious injury to the attacker in the process. Which factor would MOST heavily influence whether his actions are considered a justifiable defense of a relative?
What distinguishes an overt act from mere planning or preparation in the context of criminal law?
What distinguishes an overt act from mere planning or preparation in the context of criminal law?
A group secretly gathers and agrees to stage a coup d'état. According to the context, when could they be charged with conspiracy as a felony?
A group secretly gathers and agrees to stage a coup d'état. According to the context, when could they be charged with conspiracy as a felony?
Which of the following crimes is NOT explicitly listed as one for which conspiracy is punishable?
Which of the following crimes is NOT explicitly listed as one for which conspiracy is punishable?
What constitutes consummation in formal crimes?
What constitutes consummation in formal crimes?
In a rape case, what degree of penetration is sufficient for the crime to be considered consummated?
In a rape case, what degree of penetration is sufficient for the crime to be considered consummated?
For reiteracion to be considered an aggravating circumstance, what condition regarding the previous offense must be met?
For reiteracion to be considered an aggravating circumstance, what condition regarding the previous offense must be met?
Which of the following scenarios does NOT qualify as reiteracion?
Which of the following scenarios does NOT qualify as reiteracion?
How does quasi-recidivism differ from multi-recidivism (habitual delinquency)?
How does quasi-recidivism differ from multi-recidivism (habitual delinquency)?
What condition concerning the penalties of the prior and current offenses must be met for reiteracion to apply?
What condition concerning the penalties of the prior and current offenses must be met for reiteracion to apply?
An individual is convicted of theft and, while appealing the decision, commits another theft. Would this qualify as quasi-recidivism according to the information provided?
An individual is convicted of theft and, while appealing the decision, commits another theft. Would this qualify as quasi-recidivism according to the information provided?
Which of the following is a key requirement for multi-recidivism (habitual delinquency)?
Which of the following is a key requirement for multi-recidivism (habitual delinquency)?
In a scenario where an offender commits estafa, serves the sentence, and then commits theft, under what condition would reiteracion be considered an aggravating circumstance?
In a scenario where an offender commits estafa, serves the sentence, and then commits theft, under what condition would reiteracion be considered an aggravating circumstance?
If an individual is released from prison after serving time for robbery and, before being formally reintegrated into society, commits another robbery, would this be considered quasi-recidivism?
If an individual is released from prison after serving time for robbery and, before being formally reintegrated into society, commits another robbery, would this be considered quasi-recidivism?
Which of the following scenarios would NOT qualify as an exempting circumstance?
Which of the following scenarios would NOT qualify as an exempting circumstance?
In the context of exempting circumstances, what is the critical distinction between 'affecting the actor' and 'affecting the act'?
In the context of exempting circumstances, what is the critical distinction between 'affecting the actor' and 'affecting the act'?
What is the standard of proof required to demonstrate insanity as an exempting circumstance?
What is the standard of proof required to demonstrate insanity as an exempting circumstance?
A security guard, acting on instructions from their supervisor, detains a person suspected of shoplifting. It is later found that the suspicion was based on misinformation and the detained person suffered minor injuries during the detention. Which element is most crucial in determining whether the security guard is exempt from criminal liability?
A security guard, acting on instructions from their supervisor, detains a person suspected of shoplifting. It is later found that the suspicion was based on misinformation and the detained person suffered minor injuries during the detention. Which element is most crucial in determining whether the security guard is exempt from criminal liability?
What is the key difference in legal consequences between a justifying circumstance and an exempting circumstance?
What is the key difference in legal consequences between a justifying circumstance and an exempting circumstance?
Which of the following best describes the 'three-way test to prove insanity' in the context of exempting circumstances?
Which of the following best describes the 'three-way test to prove insanity' in the context of exempting circumstances?
Why is the concept of 'dolo' or 'culpa' important when considering exempting circumstances?
Why is the concept of 'dolo' or 'culpa' important when considering exempting circumstances?
A person with a known intellectual disability, with a mental age of approximately 6, is accused of theft. Which legal concept most directly applies to their defense?
A person with a known intellectual disability, with a mental age of approximately 6, is accused of theft. Which legal concept most directly applies to their defense?
An individual diagnosed with a brain defect that causes cognitive disability commits a crime. What additional factor is most important for determining if their condition qualifies as an exempting circumstance due to insanity?
An individual diagnosed with a brain defect that causes cognitive disability commits a crime. What additional factor is most important for determining if their condition qualifies as an exempting circumstance due to insanity?
A firefighter is ordered to set a controlled burn to prevent a larger wildfire from spreading. The controlled burn inadvertently damages a nearby property. Which condition must be met for the firefighter to potentially claim exemption from criminal liability?
A firefighter is ordered to set a controlled burn to prevent a larger wildfire from spreading. The controlled burn inadvertently damages a nearby property. Which condition must be met for the firefighter to potentially claim exemption from criminal liability?
A foreign commercial vessel is docked in Manila Bay. A crime is committed on board that does not affect the peace and order of the Philippines. According to the English Rule, which statement is most accurate regarding jurisdiction?
A foreign commercial vessel is docked in Manila Bay. A crime is committed on board that does not affect the peace and order of the Philippines. According to the English Rule, which statement is most accurate regarding jurisdiction?
A law was passed that increased the penalty for theft. The accused committed theft before the passage of the new law. If the new law is applied retroactively, this would violate which characteristic of criminal law?
A law was passed that increased the penalty for theft. The accused committed theft before the passage of the new law. If the new law is applied retroactively, this would violate which characteristic of criminal law?
A person steals merchandise from a store. Applying classical theory, what is the primary consideration in determining the appropriate penalty?
A person steals merchandise from a store. Applying classical theory, what is the primary consideration in determining the appropriate penalty?
Which of the following best describes the concept of actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea?
Which of the following best describes the concept of actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea?
A security guard, while on duty, mistakenly shoots a person he believed was an armed robber. It turns out the person was just a customer. Regarding mistake of fact, what must be present for the security guard to be relieved of criminal liability?
A security guard, while on duty, mistakenly shoots a person he believed was an armed robber. It turns out the person was just a customer. Regarding mistake of fact, what must be present for the security guard to be relieved of criminal liability?
A person driving above the speed limit accidentally hits and injures a pedestrian. Which of the following best describes the nature this act?
A person driving above the speed limit accidentally hits and injures a pedestrian. Which of the following best describes the nature this act?
A Filipino citizen commits a crime on board a Philippine-registered vessel sailing in international waters. Under the principle of extraterritoriality, can Philippine courts exercise jurisdiction over the crime?
A Filipino citizen commits a crime on board a Philippine-registered vessel sailing in international waters. Under the principle of extraterritoriality, can Philippine courts exercise jurisdiction over the crime?
A diplomat commits a crime while stationed in the Philippines. Which of the following characteristics of criminal law would this case be an exception to?
A diplomat commits a crime while stationed in the Philippines. Which of the following characteristics of criminal law would this case be an exception to?
A new law decriminalizes a previously criminal act. Before this law, an individual was charged with that act, and the case is pending in court. Based on the principle of prospectivity, what is the likely outcome?
A new law decriminalizes a previously criminal act. Before this law, an individual was charged with that act, and the case is pending in court. Based on the principle of prospectivity, what is the likely outcome?
According to the positivist theory, what is the primary reason why a person commits a crime?
According to the positivist theory, what is the primary reason why a person commits a crime?
Flashcards
Criminal Law
Criminal Law
Defines crimes and provides for their punishment.
Crime
Crime
An act committed or omitted in violation of a public law.
Felony
Felony
Acts or omissions punishable under the Revised Penal Code (RPC).
Generality (Criminal Law)
Generality (Criminal Law)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Territoriality (Criminal Law)
Territoriality (Criminal Law)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Prospectivity (Criminal Law)
Prospectivity (Criminal Law)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Classical Theory (RPC)
Classical Theory (RPC)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Positivist Theory (RPC)
Positivist Theory (RPC)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Elements of Felonies
Elements of Felonies
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intentional Felonies
Intentional Felonies
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deliberation
Deliberation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Craft, fraud, and disguise
Craft, fraud, and disguise
Signup and view all the flashcards
Craft
Craft
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fraud
Fraud
Signup and view all the flashcards
Disguise
Disguise
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reiteracion
Reiteracion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Prior Sentence Served
Prior Sentence Served
Signup and view all the flashcards
Different Offense Titles
Different Offense Titles
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reiteracion Requisites
Reiteracion Requisites
Signup and view all the flashcards
Multi-recidivism
Multi-recidivism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Quasi-Recidivism
Quasi-Recidivism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Habitual Delinquency
Habitual Delinquency
Signup and view all the flashcards
Quasi-Recidivism Penalty
Quasi-Recidivism Penalty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proximate Cause
Proximate Cause
Signup and view all the flashcards
No Proximate Cause
No Proximate Cause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Impossible Crime
Impossible Crime
Signup and view all the flashcards
Consummated Felony
Consummated Felony
Signup and view all the flashcards
Frustrated Felony
Frustrated Felony
Signup and view all the flashcards
Attempted Felony
Attempted Felony
Signup and view all the flashcards
Overt Act
Overt Act
Signup and view all the flashcards
Indeterminate Offense
Indeterminate Offense
Signup and view all the flashcards
Subjective Phase
Subjective Phase
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conspiracy (as a felony)
Conspiracy (as a felony)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Doctrine of Proportionality
Doctrine of Proportionality
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fulfillment of Duty
Fulfillment of Duty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Obedience to Order
Obedience to Order
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exempting Circumstances Definition
Exempting Circumstances Definition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exempting Circumstances
Exempting Circumstances
Signup and view all the flashcards
Imbecility Definition
Imbecility Definition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Insanity Definition
Insanity Definition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Three-Way Test for Insanity
Three-Way Test for Insanity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Standard to Determine Insanity
Standard to Determine Insanity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Quantum of Proof for Insanity
Quantum of Proof for Insanity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conspiracy
Conspiracy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proposal (Felony)
Proposal (Felony)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Justifying Circumstance
Justifying Circumstance
Signup and view all the flashcards
Self-Defense Requisites
Self-Defense Requisites
Signup and view all the flashcards
Unlawful Aggression Elements
Unlawful Aggression Elements
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reasonable Necessity
Reasonable Necessity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Lack of Sufficient Provocation
Lack of Sufficient Provocation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defense of Relative Requisites
Defense of Relative Requisites
Signup and view all the flashcards
Basis of Defense of Relatives
Basis of Defense of Relatives
Signup and view all the flashcards
Imminent Aggression
Imminent Aggression
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- The document outlines basic principles, characteristics, theories, elements, kinds, and stages of felonies under criminal law, including discussion of criminal liability, justifying and exempting circumstances, and mitigating and aggravating circumstances.
Criminal Law
- It defines crimes and their punishments.
Crime
- It is an act committed or omitted that violates a public law.
Felony
- It refers to acts or omissions punishable under the Revised Penal Code (RPC).
Characteristics of Criminal Law
Generality
- Penal laws are obligatory on everyone living or sojourning in the Philippines.
- Exception: Public international law and treaties.
- Exempted persons: sovereigns, ambassadors, ministers, and diplomatic representatives (but not consuls).
Territoriality
- Penal laws are enforceable within a country's territory.
- Exception: Extra-territoriality principle.
Prospectivity
- Criminal laws should not have retroactive effect (Ex post facto law).
- Exception: When the law is favorable to the accused.
- Exception to the exception: If the new law makes it inapplicable to pending cases where the accused is a habitual delinquent.
RPC Theories
Classical Theory
- Penalty is retribution for the crime.
- This theory focuses on the effect of the crime and emphasizes rationality, free will, and individual responsibility.
Positivist Theory
- Crime is influenced by external factors and is viewed as a social and natural phenomenon.
Extra-Territoriality
Philippine Vessel
- A Philippine vessel must be registered in the Bureau of Customs, regardless of the owner's citizenship.
Foreign Vessel
- Triable when the offense is committed on Philippine waters or is an extension of the territory of the country the vessel belongs to.
Jurisdiction Rules
French Rule
- Crimes are not triable in the courts of that country.
English Rule
- Crimes are triable in that country, unless they affect things within the vessel or refer to internal management.
- The Philippines follows the English Rule.
Warships
- Warships are exempt from the laws of another state, as they are considered territories of their own country.
Elements of Felonies
- Act or omission: A physical action or failure to perform a legal duty.
- Punishability: The act or omission must be punishable under the RPC.
- Means: The act or omission must be committed with criminal intent (dolo) or negligence (culpa).
Kinds of Felonies
Intentional Felonies
- They involve malice or deliberate intent to cause an injury.
- Elements include freedom, intelligence, and intent.
Additional Notes on Intent
- Intent demonstrates the exercise of freedom and intelligence and is shown by overt acts.
- "Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea": The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intention were so.
Mistake of Fact
- It can relieve the accused from criminal liability if the act would have been lawful under the perceived facts, with lawful intent, and without fault or carelessness.
- If the crime is not committed if the person performing the act thinks it is innocent.
Culpable Felonies
- It is committed without malice but is unintentional.
- This is caused by imprudence (lack of skill) or negligence (lack of foresight).
- Elements: Freedom, intelligence, and acting imprudently, negligently, or lacking skill or foresight.
- Mistake in identity of the intended victim - reckless imprudence.
Mala in Se vs. Mala Prohibita
Mala in Se
- The intent governs and generally considered as felonies, which are inherently immoral and may be punished by special laws.
Mala Prohibita
- Focuses on the prohibited act or law violated.
Intent vs. Motive
Intent
- The purpose to use a particular means to effect a result.
Motive
- The moving force that compels one to act for a definite result.
Incurring Criminal Liability
- A person who commits a felony (delito) is different from the intended outcome and someone performing an act that would be an offense against persons or property due to impossibility or ineffectual means.
Mistake in Identity, Blow, and Injury Greater Than Intended
Error in Personae
- It involves a mistake in the identity of the victim, where the wrong person is harmed.
Aberratio Ictus
- It is a mistake in the blow, or lack of precision.
Praeter Intentionem
- The injurious result is greater than intended.
Proximate Cause vs. No Proximate Cause
Proximate Cause
- The cause is a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any intervening cause, that produces the injury.
No Proximate Cause
- This when there is an active intervening force, or the injury was due to the intentional act of the victim.
Impossible Crime
- It is an act that would be an offense if not for inherent impossibility or ineffectual means.
- Requisites include evil Intent, impossible accomplishment, and the act not violating another RPC provision.
- Nature: The act must be intentional and either legally or physically impossible to complete.
Stages of Execution
- Over Act: Act or deed indicating intention to commit crime, which are connected with the crime indicating planning.
Consummated
- All elements for execution and accomplishment are present.
Frustrated
- The offender performs all acts of execution but the felony is not produced due to reasons independent of their will.
Attempted
- The Offender does not perform all acts of execution due to some cause, but is not on the offender's desistance,
Indeterminate Offense
- There is no certain intention on the part of the offender in performing an act.
Subjective Phase
- This is the portion of the act constituting the crime, starting from when the offender begins commission until they lose control over their actions.
- It has been passed if offender is not stopped by an external cause or their own desistance.
Formal Crimes
- These are consummated in one instant.
Felony by Omission
- This is consummated when one fails to do an act.
Conspiracy and Proposal
- Conspiracy is where agreement presupposes meeting of the minds of two or more persons to agree to effect a crime.
- Proposal is when some other person proposes its execution to some other person or persons.
- Act done is within law.
Justifying Circumstances
- Justifying circumstances means the act done is said to be in accordance with law, so that such person is FREE from BOTH criminal liability and civil liability, and recognizes non-existence of the crime.
Self Defense
- Unlawful Aggression
- Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
- Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself
Defense of Relatives
- Unlawful aggression
- Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
- In case the provocation was given by the person attacked, the one making the defense had no part therein
Defense of Strangers
- Unlawful aggression
- Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
- The person defending be not induced by revenge, resentment, or other evil motive
Avoidance of Greater Evil or Injury
- The evil sought to be avoided actually exists
- That the injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it; and
- There be no other practical and less harmful means of preventing it
Fulfillment of Duty
- That the accused acted in the performance of a duty or in the lawful exercise of a right or office
- That the injury caused or the offense committed be the necessary consequence of the due performance of duty of the lawful exercise of such right or office
Obedience to an Order
- That an order has been issued by a superior
- That such order must be for some lawful purpose
- That the means used by the subordinate to carry out said order is lawful
Exempting Circumstances Definition
- Definition: Grounds for exemption because there is something wanting in the elements of the crime.
Exempting vs. Justifying
- In Exempting circumstances the actor is affected
- In Justifying circumstances the act is affected
Exempting Circumstances (examples)
- Insanity and Imbecility:
- Imbecile: Mental development comparable to 2-7 years of age or Completely deprived of reason/discernment/freedom
- Insane: Defect of the brain or Permanently diseased/disordered, and deals with Cognitive and sensory disability
- Minority:
- 15 below is not criminally liable
- Above 15 but below 18 is not criminally liable UNLESS acted with discernment, which makes him triable
--Discenment: Capacity to understand the difference between right and wrong
Ascertaining this is done by a social worker and by the court
- There is no presumption that every minor acts with discernment
Accident
- A person is performing a lawful act
- With due care
- He causes an injury to another by mere accident
- Without fault or intention of causing it
Irrestible Force:
- That the compulsion is by means of physical force
- That the physical force must be irresistible
- That the physical force must come from a third person
Uncontrolable Force:
- Existence of an uncontrollable fear
- The fear must be real and imminent
- The fear of an injury is greater than or at least equal to that committed
Prevented by Lawful or Insurmountable cause
- That an act is required by law to be done
- That a person fails to perform such act
That his failure to perform such act was due to some lawful or insuperable cause
Absolutory Causes
- Those where the act committed but there is no penalty imposed because of some policy.
Mitigating Circumstances Definition
- Do not entirely free the actor from criminal liability, but serve only to only reduce the penalty.
Ordinary vs. Privileged Mitigating Circumstances
- Ordinary can be offset
- Privileged lowers
Example of Mitigating Circumstances
- Incomplete justifying or exempting circumstances: Referes to these circumstances incompletness
- No intention to commit so grave a wrng that that committed: Only shown when there is notable or not evident disproportion proven:
- Provocation
Alternative Circumstance Definition
- DEF Agrevating or mitigating depending on the nature and effect of the crime.
Degree of Paticipation:
- Principal. By direction paticipation , personally takw part in execution: In the crime scene
- by Inducement; By force: irresistible force, uncontrolable face
- Consipiracy Commonal intent, goal, purpose. Regardless of the act
Accessory:
- HAS KNOWLAGE OF ACT AFTER EFFECT!
- cant be changed with light felonie
Penalites:
- NUllum CRIMEN NULLA POENA SINE LEGE; NO CRIME NO LAW PUISHING IT!
- Princicpal: those that are xpressed in final judgement;
- Divisibility: grave, less grave, light:
- Complex cirmes: max seruous crime in max period
Graduation Scales:
COMPLEX CRIMES
1 act = 2 or more crimes
ORDER OF SEVERITY
When offender has to serve. Must be serbced
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.