LMGCRIM Midterms

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

Which element is crucial for establishing evident premeditation in a criminal act?

  • The offender acted impulsively without considering the consequences.
  • The offender immediately regretted the action after committing the crime.
  • The offender was provoked into committing the act due to emotional distress.
  • The offender demonstrated sufficient time to contemplate the criminal intention and formulate an execution plan. (correct)

How do craft, fraud, and disguise primarily function in the execution of a crime?

  • By employing brute physical force to overpower the victim.
  • By utilizing intellectual or mental trickery to carry out the crime. (correct)
  • By openly declaring the intent to commit a crime, thus creating fear.
  • By relying on chance and unplanned opportunities.

In the context of 'superior strength or means to weaken defense,' what constitutes an 'unfavorable inequality of forces'?

  • The victim unexpectedly uses a hidden weapon to defend themselves.
  • A fair fight where both parties have equal chances of winning.
  • A competitive sporting event with clearly defined rules and referees.
  • A disparity in age, size, or strength that significantly disadvantages the victim. (correct)

What critical evidence would support the claim of 'superior strength or means to weaken defense' in a criminal investigation?

<p>Relative physical strength disparity between the offender and victim. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary objective of employing means to weaken a victim’s defense?

<p>To place the victim in a position of disadvantage. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is the MOST accurate definition of conspiracy in the context of felony commission?

<p>An agreement to execute a previously conceived and determined crime. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person decides to commit treason and discusses the plan with a friend, seeking their help. According to the provided material, this scenario BEST describes:

<p>Proposal, because the person is suggesting the execution of treason. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition is a person performing an act considered free from both criminal and civil liability, thus recognizing the non-existence of the crime?

<p>When the act is in accordance with law under justifying circumstances. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the MOST critical element that MUST be present for a claim of self-defense to be valid?

<p>Unlawful aggression from the attacker. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which scenario BEST illustrates 'imminent' unlawful aggression?

<p>Brandishing a weapon, poised to strike. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which scenario exemplifies a situation where proximate cause is absent?

<p>An assailant stabs a victim, but a doctor's gross negligence during surgery leads to the victim's death. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In determining 'reasonable necessity' in self-defense, which factor is LEAST likely to be considered by the courts?

<p>The defender's ability to accurately judge the situation. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes 'lack of sufficient provocation' from the perspective of the person defending themselves?

<p>The defender gave no provocation at all. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the critical distinction between a frustrated felony and an attempted felony?

<p>In a frustrated felony, the offender completes all acts of execution, whereas in an attempted felony, they do not. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An individual intends to poison their neighbor but mistakenly uses sugar instead of poison. Which of the following legal concepts applies?

<p>Impossible crime (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a person defends a relative against an attack, and the relative initiated the provocation, what condition MUST be met for the defense to be considered justified?

<p>The defender must not have participated in the provocation. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

On what legal principle is the justification for defending a relative PRIMARILY based?

<p>Humanitarian sentiments and blood relations. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which element is NOT a requirement for an act to be considered an impossible crime?

<p>The act resulted in physical harm to the intended victim. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In which stage of execution is an offender considered to have lost control over their actions?

<p>Subjective phase (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A man sees his brother being attacked and intervenes, causing serious injury to the attacker in the process. Which factor would MOST heavily influence whether his actions are considered a justifiable defense of a relative?

<p>Whether the initial provocation came from the brother, and if so, the defender's involvement. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes an overt act from mere planning or preparation in the context of criminal law?

<p>An overt act is directly connected with the intended crime. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group secretly gathers and agrees to stage a coup d'état. According to the context, when could they be charged with conspiracy as a felony?

<p>Once all elements for conspiracy are demonstrably present. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following crimes is NOT explicitly listed as one for which conspiracy is punishable?

<p>Murder (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes consummation in formal crimes?

<p>When all elements necessary for the crime's execution and accomplishment are present. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a rape case, what degree of penetration is sufficient for the crime to be considered consummated?

<p>Any penetration by the penis on the cleft of the labia majora, even in the slightest degree. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

For reiteracion to be considered an aggravating circumstance, what condition regarding the previous offense must be met?

<p>The offender has served out their sentence for the first offense. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following scenarios does NOT qualify as reiteracion?

<p>An individual previously served a sentence for fraud and is now on trial for a new, unrelated homicide. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does quasi-recidivism differ from multi-recidivism (habitual delinquency)?

<p>Quasi-recidivism occurs after final conviction but before serving a sentence, while multi-recidivism involves multiple convictions within a specific timeframe. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What condition concerning the penalties of the prior and current offenses must be met for reiteracion to apply?

<p>The prior offense must have an equal or greater penalty than the current offense, or involve two or more crimes with a lighter penalty. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An individual is convicted of theft and, while appealing the decision, commits another theft. Would this qualify as quasi-recidivism according to the information provided?

<p>No, because an appeal means the initial conviction is not yet final. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is a key requirement for multi-recidivism (habitual delinquency)?

<p>The offender must have committed three or more specific crimes within a 10-year period. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a scenario where an offender commits estafa, serves the sentence, and then commits theft, under what condition would reiteracion be considered an aggravating circumstance?

<p>If the offender is now being tried for a new, unrelated crime different from theft. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If an individual is released from prison after serving time for robbery and, before being formally reintegrated into society, commits another robbery, would this be considered quasi-recidivism?

<p>No, because the individual has already served their sentence for the prior crime. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following scenarios would NOT qualify as an exempting circumstance?

<p>A police officer uses necessary force to apprehend a suspect, resulting in minor injuries to the suspect. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of exempting circumstances, what is the critical distinction between 'affecting the actor' and 'affecting the act'?

<p>'Affecting the actor' refers to circumstances where the individual lacks criminal intent, whereas 'affecting the act' suggests the act itself is lawful. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the standard of proof required to demonstrate insanity as an exempting circumstance?

<p>Clear and convincing evidence. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A security guard, acting on instructions from their supervisor, detains a person suspected of shoplifting. It is later found that the suspicion was based on misinformation and the detained person suffered minor injuries during the detention. Which element is most crucial in determining whether the security guard is exempt from criminal liability?

<p>Whether the supervisor's order was lawful. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the key difference in legal consequences between a justifying circumstance and an exempting circumstance?

<p>Justifying circumstances eliminate both criminal and civil liability, while exempting circumstances eliminate criminal liability but may still result in civil liability. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the 'three-way test to prove insanity' in the context of exempting circumstances?

<p>Showing the insanity existed at the time of the crime, it was the primary cause, and it prevented the actor from understanding the act's nature or wrongfulness. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is the concept of 'dolo' or 'culpa' important when considering exempting circumstances?

<p>Because their absence indicates a lack of criminal intent or negligence, which is fundamental to exempting circumstances. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person with a known intellectual disability, with a mental age of approximately 6, is accused of theft. Which legal concept most directly applies to their defense?

<p>Exempting circumstance due to imbecility. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An individual diagnosed with a brain defect that causes cognitive disability commits a crime. What additional factor is most important for determining if their condition qualifies as an exempting circumstance due to insanity?

<p>Whether the individual's condition prevented them from understanding the nature and wrongfulness of their actions at the time of the crime. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A firefighter is ordered to set a controlled burn to prevent a larger wildfire from spreading. The controlled burn inadvertently damages a nearby property. Which condition must be met for the firefighter to potentially claim exemption from criminal liability?

<p>The order to set the controlled burn must have been lawful, and the means used by the firefighter must have been lawful. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A foreign commercial vessel is docked in Manila Bay. A crime is committed on board that does not affect the peace and order of the Philippines. According to the English Rule, which statement is most accurate regarding jurisdiction?

<p>The crime is under the jurisdiction of the country where the vessel is registered. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A law was passed that increased the penalty for theft. The accused committed theft before the passage of the new law. If the new law is applied retroactively, this would violate which characteristic of criminal law?

<p>Prospectivity (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person steals merchandise from a store. Applying classical theory, what is the primary consideration in determining the appropriate penalty?

<p>The severity of the crime and its impact on the victim or society. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the concept of actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea?

<p>The act does not make a person guilty unless the mind is also guilty. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A security guard, while on duty, mistakenly shoots a person he believed was an armed robber. It turns out the person was just a customer. Regarding mistake of fact, what must be present for the security guard to be relieved of criminal liability?

<p>The security guard must have acted without fault or carelessness, with lawful intention, and the act would have been lawful if the facts were as he believed them to be. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person driving above the speed limit accidentally hits and injures a pedestrian. Which of the following best describes the nature this act?

<p>Culpable felony (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A Filipino citizen commits a crime on board a Philippine-registered vessel sailing in international waters. Under the principle of extraterritoriality, can Philippine courts exercise jurisdiction over the crime?

<p>Yes, because the vessel is considered an extension of Philippine territory. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A diplomat commits a crime while stationed in the Philippines. Which of the following characteristics of criminal law would this case be an exception to?

<p>Generality (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A new law decriminalizes a previously criminal act. Before this law, an individual was charged with that act, and the case is pending in court. Based on the principle of prospectivity, what is the likely outcome?

<p>The new law will apply, and the charges will be dropped. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the positivist theory, what is the primary reason why a person commits a crime?

<p>External factors, social and economic conditions. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Criminal Law

Defines crimes and provides for their punishment.

Crime

An act committed or omitted in violation of a public law.

Felony

Acts or omissions punishable under the Revised Penal Code (RPC).

Generality (Criminal Law)

Penal laws apply to everyone in the Philippines.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Territoriality (Criminal Law)

Penal laws are enforceable only within a country's territory.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Prospectivity (Criminal Law)

Penal laws generally do not punish acts committed before the law existed.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Classical Theory (RPC)

Penalty should be equal to the crime committed; focuses on free will.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Positivist Theory (RPC)

Criminal behavior is driven by external factors.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Elements of Felonies

Act or omission is punishable; incurred through dolo (intent) or culpa (fault).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intentional Felonies

With malice; deliberate intent to cause injury. Requires freedom, intelligence, and intent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deliberation

Sufficient time to reflect on the criminal intention and decide on executing it. Can be ANY time, as long as the offender has JUDGED and THOUGHT of a plan to carry out his criminal intention.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Craft, fraud, and disguise

Intellectual or mental ways to carry out crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Craft

Intellectual trickery/cunning.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fraud

Insidious words/machinations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Disguise

Concealing identity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reiteracion

A circumstance where an offender has been previously punished for a crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Prior Sentence Served

The offender must have served out their sentence for the first offense.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Different Offense Titles

The new offense must not be part of the same title as the previous offense.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reiteracion Requisites

Accused is currently on trial, previously served time for equal/greater or 2+ lighter penalties and is convicted.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Multi-recidivism

Committing 3+ crimes within 10 years involving serious/less serious physical injuries, robbery, theft, estafa, or falsification.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Quasi-Recidivism

After final judgment, but before serving the sentence, the person commits a new felony.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Habitual Delinquency

3 or more crimes within 10 years.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Quasi-Recidivism Penalty

The penalty will be maximal.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximate Cause

Cause that, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury, and without which the result would not have occurred.

Signup and view all the flashcards

No Proximate Cause

When an active force intervened between the offender's act and the injury.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Impossible Crime

An act performed that would be an offense against persons or property, were it not for the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment. Act should be intentional.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Consummated Felony

All elements necessary for its execution and accomplishment are present.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Frustrated Felony

Offender performs all acts of execution which would produce a felony, but it does not produce it by reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Attempted Felony

Offender does not perform all the acts of execution due to some cause or accident other than their own spontaneous desistance.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Overt Act

Act or deed indicating the intention to commit a crime, more than mere planning/preparation, and directly connected with the crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Indeterminate Offense

Purpose of the offender is not certain when performing an act.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Subjective Phase

Portion of the act constituting the crime, starting from where the offender begins its commission until they no longer have control over their acts.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Conspiracy (as a felony)

Secret planning by a group to commit a crime. Requires an agreement with meeting of minds by two or more people.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Doctrine of Proportionality

Greater evil must not be brought about by negligence, imprudence, or violation of law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fulfillment of Duty

Acting in fulfillment of a duty or lawful exercise of a right/office. Requires that the act be a necessary consequence of said duty/right.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Obedience to Order

Acting in obedience to an order issued by a superior for some lawful purpose, using lawful means.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exempting Circumstances Definition

Grounds for exemption from punishment because the act was involuntary or non-negligent; based on absence of criminal intent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exempting Circumstances

Affects the actor; wrongful act but actor isn't liable; crime exists, but no dolo/culpa; only civil liability remains.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Imbecility Definition

Mental development comparable to a 2-7 year old; completely deprived of reason, discernment, and freedom.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Insanity Definition

Defect/disease of the brain causing cognitive and sensory disability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Three-Way Test for Insanity

1)Insanity present at the time of the crime. 2)Insanity is the primary cause, medically proven. 3)Inability to appreciate the act's nature/wrongfulness.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Standard to Determine Insanity

Complete deprivation of intelligence; incapability of criminal intent; incapability to discern completely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Quantum of Proof for Insanity

No longer proof of reasonable doubt, but clear and convincing evidence is required.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Conspiracy

Agreement to carry out a previously conceived and determined plan.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proposal (Felony)

A person proposes committing a felony to another.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Justifying Circumstance

Act in accordance with the law, free from criminal and civil liability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Self-Defense Requisites

  1. Unlawful aggression; 2. Reasonable necessity; 3. Lack of sufficient provocation.
Signup and view all the flashcards

Unlawful Aggression Elements

Physical attack, actual/imminent, unlawful.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonable Necessity

Using necessary force when there's no time to think, proportional to the threat.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Lack of Sufficient Provocation

No provocation, or insufficient provocation, by the defender.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Defense of Relative Requisites

  1. Unlawful aggression; 2. Reasonable necessity; 3. Defender isn't involved in the provocation.
Signup and view all the flashcards

Basis of Defense of Relatives

Based on humanitarian sentiments and blood relations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Imminent Aggression

Impending or at the point of happening.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • The document outlines basic principles, characteristics, theories, elements, kinds, and stages of felonies under criminal law, including discussion of criminal liability, justifying and exempting circumstances, and mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

Criminal Law

  • It defines crimes and their punishments.

Crime

  • It is an act committed or omitted that violates a public law.

Felony

  • It refers to acts or omissions punishable under the Revised Penal Code (RPC).

Characteristics of Criminal Law

Generality

  • Penal laws are obligatory on everyone living or sojourning in the Philippines.
  • Exception: Public international law and treaties.
  • Exempted persons: sovereigns, ambassadors, ministers, and diplomatic representatives (but not consuls).

Territoriality

  • Penal laws are enforceable within a country's territory.
  • Exception: Extra-territoriality principle.

Prospectivity

  • Criminal laws should not have retroactive effect (Ex post facto law).
  • Exception: When the law is favorable to the accused.
  • Exception to the exception: If the new law makes it inapplicable to pending cases where the accused is a habitual delinquent.

RPC Theories

Classical Theory

  • Penalty is retribution for the crime.
  • This theory focuses on the effect of the crime and emphasizes rationality, free will, and individual responsibility.

Positivist Theory

  • Crime is influenced by external factors and is viewed as a social and natural phenomenon.

Extra-Territoriality

Philippine Vessel

  • A Philippine vessel must be registered in the Bureau of Customs, regardless of the owner's citizenship.

Foreign Vessel

  • Triable when the offense is committed on Philippine waters or is an extension of the territory of the country the vessel belongs to.

Jurisdiction Rules

French Rule

  • Crimes are not triable in the courts of that country.

English Rule

  • Crimes are triable in that country, unless they affect things within the vessel or refer to internal management.
  • The Philippines follows the English Rule.

Warships

  • Warships are exempt from the laws of another state, as they are considered territories of their own country.

Elements of Felonies

  • Act or omission: A physical action or failure to perform a legal duty.
  • Punishability: The act or omission must be punishable under the RPC.
  • Means: The act or omission must be committed with criminal intent (dolo) or negligence (culpa).

Kinds of Felonies

Intentional Felonies

  • They involve malice or deliberate intent to cause an injury.
  • Elements include freedom, intelligence, and intent.

Additional Notes on Intent

  • Intent demonstrates the exercise of freedom and intelligence and is shown by overt acts.
  • "Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea": The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intention were so.

Mistake of Fact

  • It can relieve the accused from criminal liability if the act would have been lawful under the perceived facts, with lawful intent, and without fault or carelessness.
  • If the crime is not committed if the person performing the act thinks it is innocent.

Culpable Felonies

  • It is committed without malice but is unintentional.
  • This is caused by imprudence (lack of skill) or negligence (lack of foresight).
  • Elements: Freedom, intelligence, and acting imprudently, negligently, or lacking skill or foresight.
  • Mistake in identity of the intended victim - reckless imprudence.

Mala in Se vs. Mala Prohibita

Mala in Se

  • The intent governs and generally considered as felonies, which are inherently immoral and may be punished by special laws.

Mala Prohibita

  • Focuses on the prohibited act or law violated.

Intent vs. Motive

Intent

  • The purpose to use a particular means to effect a result.

Motive

  • The moving force that compels one to act for a definite result.

Incurring Criminal Liability

  • A person who commits a felony (delito) is different from the intended outcome and someone performing an act that would be an offense against persons or property due to impossibility or ineffectual means.

Mistake in Identity, Blow, and Injury Greater Than Intended

Error in Personae

  • It involves a mistake in the identity of the victim, where the wrong person is harmed.

Aberratio Ictus

  • It is a mistake in the blow, or lack of precision.

Praeter Intentionem

  • The injurious result is greater than intended.

Proximate Cause vs. No Proximate Cause

Proximate Cause

  • The cause is a natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any intervening cause, that produces the injury.

No Proximate Cause

  • This when there is an active intervening force, or the injury was due to the intentional act of the victim.

Impossible Crime

  • It is an act that would be an offense if not for inherent impossibility or ineffectual means.
  • Requisites include evil Intent, impossible accomplishment, and the act not violating another RPC provision.
  • Nature: The act must be intentional and either legally or physically impossible to complete.

Stages of Execution

  • Over Act: Act or deed indicating intention to commit crime, which are connected with the crime indicating planning.

Consummated

  • All elements for execution and accomplishment are present.

Frustrated

  • The offender performs all acts of execution but the felony is not produced due to reasons independent of their will.

Attempted

  • The Offender does not perform all acts of execution due to some cause, but is not on the offender's desistance,

Indeterminate Offense

  • There is no certain intention on the part of the offender in performing an act.

Subjective Phase

  • This is the portion of the act constituting the crime, starting from when the offender begins commission until they lose control over their actions.
  • It has been passed if offender is not stopped by an external cause or their own desistance.

Formal Crimes

  • These are consummated in one instant.

Felony by Omission

  • This is consummated when one fails to do an act.

Conspiracy and Proposal

  • Conspiracy is where agreement presupposes meeting of the minds of two or more persons to agree to effect a crime.
  • Proposal is when some other person proposes its execution to some other person or persons.
  • Act done is within law.

Justifying Circumstances

  • Justifying circumstances means the act done is said to be in accordance with law, so that such person is FREE from BOTH criminal liability and civil liability, and recognizes non-existence of the crime.

Self Defense

  1. Unlawful Aggression
  2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
  3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself

Defense of Relatives

  1. Unlawful aggression
  2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
  3. In case the provocation was given by the person attacked, the one making the defense had no part therein

Defense of Strangers

  1. Unlawful aggression
  2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it
  3. The person defending be not induced by revenge, resentment, or other evil motive

Avoidance of Greater Evil or Injury

  1. The evil sought to be avoided actually exists
  2. That the injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it; and
  3. There be no other practical and less harmful means of preventing it

Fulfillment of Duty

  1. That the accused acted in the performance of a duty or in the lawful exercise of a right or office
  2. That the injury caused or the offense committed be the necessary consequence of the due performance of duty of the lawful exercise of such right or office

Obedience to an Order

  1. That an order has been issued by a superior
  2. That such order must be for some lawful purpose
  3. That the means used by the subordinate to carry out said order is lawful

Exempting Circumstances Definition

  • Definition: Grounds for exemption because there is something wanting in the elements of the crime.

Exempting vs. Justifying

  • In Exempting circumstances the actor is affected
  • In Justifying circumstances the act is affected

Exempting Circumstances (examples)

  • Insanity and Imbecility:
    • Imbecile: Mental development comparable to 2-7 years of age or Completely deprived of reason/discernment/freedom
    • Insane: Defect of the brain or Permanently diseased/disordered, and deals with Cognitive and sensory disability
  • Minority:
    • 15 below is not criminally liable
    • Above 15 but below 18 is not criminally liable UNLESS acted with discernment, which makes him triable --Discenment: Capacity to understand the difference between right and wrong Ascertaining this is done by a social worker and by the court
      • There is no presumption that every minor acts with discernment

Accident

  1. A person is performing a lawful act
  2. With due care
  3. He causes an injury to another by mere accident
  4. Without fault or intention of causing it

Irrestible Force:

  1. That the compulsion is by means of physical force
  2. That the physical force must be irresistible
  3. That the physical force must come from a third person

Uncontrolable Force:

  1. Existence of an uncontrollable fear
  2. The fear must be real and imminent
  3. The fear of an injury is greater than or at least equal to that committed

Prevented by Lawful or Insurmountable cause

  1. That an act is required by law to be done
  2. That a person fails to perform such act

That his failure to perform such act was due to some lawful or insuperable cause

Absolutory Causes

  • Those where the act committed but there is no penalty imposed because of some policy.

Mitigating Circumstances Definition

  • Do not entirely free the actor from criminal liability, but serve only to only reduce the penalty.

Ordinary vs. Privileged Mitigating Circumstances

  • Ordinary can be offset
  • Privileged lowers

Example of Mitigating Circumstances

  • Incomplete justifying or exempting circumstances: Referes to these circumstances incompletness
  • No intention to commit so grave a wrng that that committed: Only shown when there is notable or not evident disproportion proven:
  • Provocation

Alternative Circumstance Definition

  • DEF Agrevating or mitigating depending on the nature and effect of the crime.

Degree of Paticipation:

  • Principal. By direction paticipation , personally takw part in execution: In the crime scene
  • by Inducement; By force: irresistible force, uncontrolable face
  • Consipiracy Commonal intent, goal, purpose. Regardless of the act

Accessory:

  • HAS KNOWLAGE OF ACT AFTER EFFECT!
  • cant be changed with light felonie

Penalites:

  • NUllum CRIMEN NULLA POENA SINE LEGE; NO CRIME NO LAW PUISHING IT!
  • Princicpal: those that are xpressed in final judgement;
  • Divisibility: grave, less grave, light:
  • Complex cirmes: max seruous crime in max period

Graduation Scales:

COMPLEX CRIMES

1 act = 2 or more crimes

ORDER OF SEVERITY

When offender has to serve. Must be serbced

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

LMGCRIM Reviewer PDF

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser