Mastering Research Questions

Causal analytics

A direct cause-and-effect relationship between two variables

To make robust and reliable predictions

Availability of biased data

They ensure internal validity

Informed consent

Balancing ethical considerations

Random assignment

To assess the natural course or outcome of the variable of interest in the absence of the intervention

Maturation

To examine the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables

Instrumental Variables

The causal effect of treatment on an individual unit or participant

Heterogeneity

No unmeasured confounding

To control for confounding variables and make causal inferences

The different outcomes that could occur under different treatment conditions

To select control group participants who are similar to treatment group participants based on observable characteristics

Regression analysis cannot account for unobservable or unmeasured confounding variables

True

False

False

True

True

True

True

True

True

False

True

True

True

True

False

True

True

False

True

The goal of causal analytics is to make robust and reliable predictions and inform decision-making processes based on causal relationships rather than mere associations.

Association refers to a statistical relationship between two variables that occur together, implying a correlation. However, it does not necessarily imply causation. Causation, on the other hand, means there is a direct cause-and-effect relationship between two variables.

To establish causation, several key concepts need to be understood: correlation, directionality, and confounding variables.

Regression analysis helps to estimate the causal effect of an intervention or treatment on an outcome of interest and allows researchers to control for confounding variables and make causal inferences by exploring the relationship between the treatment and outcome variables.

Potential outcomes refer to the different outcomes that could occur under different treatment conditions.

The limitations of regression analysis in causal inference include assumptions such as no unmeasured confounding, linearity, and homoscedasticity, covariate selection, extrapolation, hidden bias, reverse causality, and limited generalizability to other populations or settings.

The techniques used in regression analysis for causal inference when randomized controlled trials are not feasible or ethical are matching and propensity score analysis.

Some challenges in establishing causality in causal analytics include data limitations, experimental constraints, ethical constraints, and hidden or unobserved variables.

Some ethical considerations in causal analytics include informed consent, privacy and data protection, fairness and non-discrimination, accountability and transparency, and continuous evaluation and improvement.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are significant in experimental design for establishing causality because they allow researchers to infer causation by isolating the effect of the treatment on the outcome variable. The random assignment ensures that any observed differences between the treatment and control groups are likely due to the intervention.

The purpose of a control group in an experiment is to serve as a baseline comparison for the treatment group. The control group does not receive the intervention or treatment being studied, allowing researchers to compare the outcomes between the two groups and determine the causal effect of the treatment.

Counterfactual analysis is a method used to estimate causal effects by comparing what actually happened (the observed outcome) to a hypothetical scenario (the counterfactual outcome) where a different treatment or intervention occurred. It involves comparing the outcomes under different conditions to estimate the causal impact of an intervention or treatment variable.

Individual Treatment Effects (ITE) refer to the causal effect of treatment on an individual unit or participant. It compares the outcome observed under the treatment condition to the hypothetical outcome under the no-treatment condition for that specific individual. Average Treatment Effects (ATE) refer to the average causal effect of treatment on the entire population or group. It compares the average outcome under the treatment condition to the average outcome under the no-treatment condition for the entire population.

1. Heterogeneity: Individuals or units in a population may respond differently to treatment, which can complicate estimating accurate counterfactual effects. 2. Selection Bias: Non-random assignment of treatment can introduce bias and confound treatment effects. 3. Unobserved Confounding: Counterfactual analysis assumes that all relevant confounding variables are measured and included in the analysis. 4. Identification Assumptions: Estimating counterfactuals relies on specific assumptions, such as no unmeasured confounding or no treatment effect heterogeneity. 5. Dynamic Treatment Effects: Counterfactual analysis generally focuses on short-term effects, and long-term effects may require additional considerations. 6. External Validity: Estimating causal effects with counterfactual analysis requires careful generalization.

Counterfactual analysis can address selection bias by controlling for observable covariates and applying appropriate matching or regression adjustment techniques. It assumes that all relevant confounding variables are measured and included in the analysis. However, unobserved confounding variables, which are not accounted for, can still bias the estimated treatment effects.

The purpose of random assignment in experimental design is to ensure that any differences observed between treatment and control groups are not due to pre-existing characteristics or biases.

Some validity threats in experimental design include selection bias, maturation, history, and attrition. These threats can be addressed by using random assignment, control groups, conducting pre- and post-test measurements, and employing strategies to address attrition such as proper participant recruitment and intent-to-treat analysis.

Some real-world examples of experimental design in business analytics and digital marketing include A/B testing, pricing experiments, product development testing, and customer retention strategies evaluation.

Regression analysis is a statistical method used to examine the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. In causal inference, regression analysis can help estimate the causal effect of an intervention or treatment on an outcome of interest by controlling for confounding variables.

The purpose of random assignment is to ensure that any differences observed between treatment and control groups are not due to pre-existing characteristics or biases.

Some common validity threats in experimental design include selection bias, maturation, history, and attrition.

Regression analysis is used to examine the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables in order to estimate the causal effect of an intervention or treatment on an outcome of interest.

One example is A/B testing, where users are randomly assigned to different versions of a website, app, or marketing campaign to assess the causal impact of different designs or messages.