Madhwa v City Council Case Study
6 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which section of the Constitution was found to be violated in Madhwa and Others v City Council?

  • Section 82
  • Section 20
  • Section 14 (correct)
  • Chapter V

    • In the case of Madhwa and Others v City Council, what did Justice Harris determine about the resolution of Africanisation by the Council?

  • It was in favor of the applicants.
  • It was to promote the involvement of non-citizens.
  • It was based on non-citizenship.
  • It was discriminatory as per the Constitution. (correct)

    • What type of treatment does the Constitution in the text define as discriminatory?

  • Treatment based on political opinions
  • Treatment based on wealth
  • Treatment based on race or creed (correct)
  • Treatment based on residency

    • Why did Shah Devshi and Company Limited challenge the refusal of their transport licenses renewal by the Transporting Licensing Board?

    <p>The Board considered irrelevant factors.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What reason did the Transporting Licensing Board give for refusing to renew transport licenses for Shah Devshi and Company Limited?

    <p>The company had no citizens as owners.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In accordance with the text, what was the primary focus of the Transporting Licensing Board's decision regarding Shah Devshi and Company Limited?

    <p>Increasing competition in the transport business.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser