Madhwa v City Council Case Study

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

Which section of the Constitution was found to be violated in Madhwa and Others v City Council?

  • Section 82
  • Section 20
  • Section 14 (correct)
  • Chapter V

In the case of Madhwa and Others v City Council, what did Justice Harris determine about the resolution of Africanisation by the Council?

  • It was in favor of the applicants.
  • It was to promote the involvement of non-citizens.
  • It was based on non-citizenship.
  • It was discriminatory as per the Constitution. (correct)

What type of treatment does the Constitution in the text define as discriminatory?

  • Treatment based on political opinions
  • Treatment based on wealth
  • Treatment based on race or creed (correct)
  • Treatment based on residency

Why did Shah Devshi and Company Limited challenge the refusal of their transport licenses renewal by the Transporting Licensing Board?

<p>The Board considered irrelevant factors. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What reason did the Transporting Licensing Board give for refusing to renew transport licenses for Shah Devshi and Company Limited?

<p>The company had no citizens as owners. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In accordance with the text, what was the primary focus of the Transporting Licensing Board's decision regarding Shah Devshi and Company Limited?

<p>Increasing competition in the transport business. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser