Podcast
Questions and Answers
What differentiates the Lodox-Statscan (LS) from conventional X-ray systems?
What differentiates the Lodox-Statscan (LS) from conventional X-ray systems?
- LS is designed for whole-body imaging with a lower radiation dose. (correct)
- LS requires a longer scan than conventional X-ray systems.
- LS only captures images of skeletal structures, while X-ray systems can image soft tissues.
- LS emits a higher radiation dose than conventional X-ray systems.
How has the FDA's approval of Lodox-Statscan impacted trauma centers?
How has the FDA's approval of Lodox-Statscan impacted trauma centers?
- Trauma centers have reduced their reliance on imaging technologies due to the availability of Lodox-Statscan.
- Trauma centers have integrated Lodox-Statscan into their Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols. (correct)
- Trauma centers no longer need to follow Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols after adopting Lodox-Statscan.
- Trauma centers have replaced all conventional radiography units with Lodox-Statscan.
For what original purpose was the Lodox-Statscan device developed?
For what original purpose was the Lodox-Statscan device developed?
- To track bone density changes in patients with osteoporosis.
- To perform high-resolution imaging in cardiac surgery.
- To conduct low-dose, whole-body scans on workers in the South African diamond-mining industry. (correct)
- To offer a non-invasive method for detecting tumors in cancer patients.
What is the significance of Beningfield's 1999 report regarding Lodox-Statscan?
What is the significance of Beningfield's 1999 report regarding Lodox-Statscan?
How does the Lodox-Statscan (LS) device create images?
How does the Lodox-Statscan (LS) device create images?
How long does the Lodox-Statscan C-arm typically take to complete a whole-body anterior-posterior (a.p.) scan?
How long does the Lodox-Statscan C-arm typically take to complete a whole-body anterior-posterior (a.p.) scan?
What unique feature does the Lodox-Statscan unit incorporate to enhance patient care during resuscitation efforts?
What unique feature does the Lodox-Statscan unit incorporate to enhance patient care during resuscitation efforts?
How does the radiation dose from a Lodox-Statscan compare to conventional radiography for chest and pelvic imaging?
How does the radiation dose from a Lodox-Statscan compare to conventional radiography for chest and pelvic imaging?
Why might the Lodox-Statscan be considered more advantageous over conventional radiography in pediatric trauma cases?
Why might the Lodox-Statscan be considered more advantageous over conventional radiography in pediatric trauma cases?
In what specific anatomical regions were Lodox-Statscan (LS) digital images judged superior to conventional images, as found in a study by Beningfield et al?
In what specific anatomical regions were Lodox-Statscan (LS) digital images judged superior to conventional images, as found in a study by Beningfield et al?
What did the study by Shenarts et al reveal when comparing conventional cervical spine radiographs to CT scans?
What did the study by Shenarts et al reveal when comparing conventional cervical spine radiographs to CT scans?
According to the ATLS protocol modification study, how does the total emergency room (ER) time compare between using Lodox-Statscan (LS) and conventional radiographs?
According to the ATLS protocol modification study, how does the total emergency room (ER) time compare between using Lodox-Statscan (LS) and conventional radiographs?
In pediatric trauma, what specific concern does the use of radiation raise, influencing the choice of imaging protocols?
In pediatric trauma, what specific concern does the use of radiation raise, influencing the choice of imaging protocols?
What was the conclusion of Pitcher et al. regarding the use of Lodox-Statscan in pediatric polytrauma cases?
What was the conclusion of Pitcher et al. regarding the use of Lodox-Statscan in pediatric polytrauma cases?
What benefit does the Lodox-Statscan offer in the diagnosis of acute ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction?
What benefit does the Lodox-Statscan offer in the diagnosis of acute ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction?
What is one limitation to the effectiveness of the LS?
What is one limitation to the effectiveness of the LS?
What is one way that the radiation dosage of the Lodox Statscan compares to conventional radiography?
What is one way that the radiation dosage of the Lodox Statscan compares to conventional radiography?
Where was the Lodox Statscan device first used?
Where was the Lodox Statscan device first used?
The Lodox-Statscan (LS) is an FDA-approved?
The Lodox-Statscan (LS) is an FDA-approved?
What is a feature of the Lodox Statscan
What is a feature of the Lodox Statscan
The Lodox Statscan is particularly effective for?
The Lodox Statscan is particularly effective for?
How do the acquisition costs of the LS compare to those of conventional imaging products?
How do the acquisition costs of the LS compare to those of conventional imaging products?
Which of the following is true of the Lodox Statscan?
Which of the following is true of the Lodox Statscan?
How does the Lodox Statscan impact the need for additional staff costs?
How does the Lodox Statscan impact the need for additional staff costs?
Which types of studies can be acquired using Lodox Statscan?
Which types of studies can be acquired using Lodox Statscan?
When was the Lodox Statscan approved in the USA?
When was the Lodox Statscan approved in the USA?
The C-arm of the Lodox Statscan can be rotated axially around the patient up to:
The C-arm of the Lodox Statscan can be rotated axially around the patient up to:
Ethical reasons prevent studies comparing the LS with?
Ethical reasons prevent studies comparing the LS with?
In a prospective study comparing five-view conventional cervical spine radiographs with the gold standard computed tomography (CT) scan, Shenarts et al detected?
In a prospective study comparing five-view conventional cervical spine radiographs with the gold standard computed tomography (CT) scan, Shenarts et al detected?
As opposed to being an ATLS tool, LS most compares to:
As opposed to being an ATLS tool, LS most compares to:
What percentage of conventional radiograph radiation is required for anteroposterior, lateral thoracoabdominal studies?
What percentage of conventional radiograph radiation is required for anteroposterior, lateral thoracoabdominal studies?
What is the average percentage of radiation dose across the chest and pelvis?
What is the average percentage of radiation dose across the chest and pelvis?
What is the average radiation skin-entry dose?
What is the average radiation skin-entry dose?
The LS radiation dose for proper skull visualization accounted for what percentage of that of a conventional radiograph?
The LS radiation dose for proper skull visualization accounted for what percentage of that of a conventional radiograph?
Radiation's effect on the immature skeleton can interfere with?
Radiation's effect on the immature skeleton can interfere with?
While CT remains the gold standard, its uncritical use has led to?
While CT remains the gold standard, its uncritical use has led to?
The C-arm travels along the table length at up to...?
The C-arm travels along the table length at up to...?
Berry et al reported what sensitivity in detecting thoracolumbar lesions?
Berry et al reported what sensitivity in detecting thoracolumbar lesions?
Flashcards
Lodox-Statscan
Lodox-Statscan
A whole-body, skeletal and soft-tissue, low-dose X-ray scanner.
Thoraco-abdominal scan time
Thoraco-abdominal scan time
Typically completed in 3-5 minutes with approximately one-third of the radiation of traditional radiography.
Original Purpose of Lodox-Statscan
Original Purpose of Lodox-Statscan
For low-dose, whole-body scans on diamond-mining workers.
FDA Approval Year
FDA Approval Year
Signup and view all the flashcards
Applications of LS
Applications of LS
Signup and view all the flashcards
Lodox-Statscan Mechanism
Lodox-Statscan Mechanism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Whole-body a.p. scan time
Whole-body a.p. scan time
Signup and view all the flashcards
Radiation dose of LS relative to conventional
Radiation dose of LS relative to conventional
Signup and view all the flashcards
Average radiation skin-entry dose
Average radiation skin-entry dose
Signup and view all the flashcards
Clinical trial comparison
Clinical trial comparison
Signup and view all the flashcards
Image Quality Comparison
Image Quality Comparison
Signup and view all the flashcards
LS Imaging Sensitivity and Specificity
LS Imaging Sensitivity and Specificity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Radiation effects on children
Radiation effects on children
Signup and view all the flashcards
Benefit of LS use
Benefit of LS use
Signup and view all the flashcards
Future of LS
Future of LS
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- The Lodox-Statscan (LS) is a whole-body X-ray scanner for skeletal and soft tissue imaging, with low radiation doses
- Thoraco-abdominal studies can be obtained in 3-5 minutes using LS
- The amount of radiation used is approximately one-third of conventional radiography
- The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved LS for use in the USA
- The use of LS technology has been incorporated into the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols of numerous trauma centers
- The Lodox-Statscan device (LS) was initially designed for the South African diamond-mining industry
- It was inteneded for conducting low-dose, whole-body scans on mining workers
- The LS was first used for medical applications around 1999
FDA Approval and Trauma Centers
- The Lodox-Statscan device got approved in the USA in 2002 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- It was for standard emergency and radiographic examination of trauma patients
- About 25 trauma centers across the globe have added the LS technology to their emergency management protocols
- The LS has become a useful diagnostic tool within medicine
- Recent publications show the device being effectively used in pediatrics, pediatric trauma, neurosurgery, forensic medicine, and internal medicine
- The Lodox-Statscan is currently the only FDA-approved device of its kind
- A new 2D/3D, full body scanner (EOS http://www.biospacemed.com) has been introduced to the market, but may not be applicable in injured patients
Technical Specs
- The LS is mounted on an X-ray tube emitting a collimated fan-beam of X-rays
- The opposite end of the C-arm has an X-ray detector unit that includes scintillator arrays linked to charge-coupled devices
- The C-arm travels at up to 138 mm/s along the table
- It takes 13 seconds to complete a whole-body anterior-posterior (a.p.) scan
- The C-arm can be rotated axially around the patient up to 90°
- Subsequent whole-body, horizontal beam, shoot-through lateral, erect, and oblique views can be attained
- The radiation dose from digital radiation compared to conventional dose varies from 72% for the chest to 2% for the pelvis, averaging at 6%
- The radiation skin-entry dose is 36 mrem (range 18-67 mrem) on average
- Meanwhile, the conventional dose is 591 mrem (range 20-2280 mrem)
Costs
- The acquisition costs for the LS machine are similar to conventional hospital imaging products
- The running and material costs are low because the device is compatible with digital computerized software via conventional computer hardware
- No extra staff, service or time costs are required
Fields of Application - Trauma Management
- Boffard et al conducted a clinical trial comparing effectiveness between the LS and the standard ATLS X-ray protocol when detecting injuries
- Compared to a.p. radiographs, no loss of information was reported in the cervical spine, pelvis, chest, the cervicothoracic junction, or in long bones
- Beningfield et al did a study of 39 patients that compared LS images with conventional images using a scoring system
- The digital images were judged as being superior for the lungs, soft tissues, and mediastinum
Studies
- Shenarts et al compared five-view conventional cervical spine radiographs with the gold standard computed tomography CT scan
- Sensitivity was at 54% for conventional X-rays and 96% for the CT scans
- Berry et al reported sensitivity at 73%, specificity at 100% and negative predictive value at 92%
- This was for conventional radiographs in detecting thoracolumbar lesions
- Guillamondegui et al founded sensitivity at 68% and specificity at 98%
- This was for conventional pelvic radiographs
- Overall sensitivity of LS imaging was 62% and specificity was 99%
- Sensitivity and specificity findings for individual body regions were similar to or better than conventional
- A modified ATLS protocol (Bernese) was done to lower radiography time before secondary survey
Time advantages
- Radiography time was reduced
- It went from an average of 37 to 26 minutes
- Scanning time was around 4 minutes with LS compared to 26 minutes with conventional graphs
- Total emergency room time remained unchanged at a median of 29 minutes
Pediatric Trauma
- Radiation effects are major in children
- They may affect the immature skeleton
- It interferes with chondrogenesis and reabsorption of calcified cartilage as well as bone at the growth plate
- Relative digital radiation and radiation skin entry doses with LS imaging may be suitable for pediatric polytrauma patients
- Maree et al measured the entry and effective doses of different radiological examinations in children using LS and Shimadzu radiography units in 2007
- They calculated a standard deviation for the entry dose of 0-0.6%
- Pitcher et al evaluated how effective LS machines were for pediatric polytrauma
- It was found to be effective for triage and had similar quality to conventional radiography
- Some revised their polytrauma imaging protocols from ATLS X-rays plus local radiographs to a new protocol
- New protocols comprise an LS a.p. and lateral bodygram
- Lodox scans were found to have enhanced diagnostic yield and shorter imaging times in the ER
Other applications
- The LS device has potential in this field.
- The device is used in the management of acute ventriculoperitoneal shunt dysfunction
- South African studies show benefits of the LS in forensic practice
Summary and Outlook
- The device is FDA-approved
- LS has been proven to be just as or slightly better than conventional radiographs
- CT scanning leads to increased costs and radiation exposure
- Combining the use of LS, focused abdominal sonography, and thorough clinical examination may reduce the number of CT scans needed
- The Ls is less effective in excluding lesions of the cervical spine
- Not be considered as a replacement for CT scans in the instances
- High-speed, high-quality and low-dose body images make this device high potential for the future
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.