Life-or-Death Decision Making
20 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the purpose of the module described in the text?

To interconnect with the entire nation

How many tracks are currently being looked at?

Two

What type of feeds are being surveyed?

Live feeds

What interrupts the conversation?

<p>Cell phone ringing</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person do when their phone rings?

<p>Checks the phone</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person do after checking their phone?

<p>Leaves the area</p> Signup and view all the answers

What do the workers do?

<p>Approach the scene</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the female voice announce?

<p>Object on track and train approaching</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person realize after the announcement?

<p>There is no one on the track</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person do after realizing the urgency of the situation?

<p>Rehearses what to do</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of the module described in the text?

<p>The purpose of the module is to interconnect with the entire nation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the person doing when their phone rings?

<p>The person is engaged in surveying the scene.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person realize after hearing the announcement?

<p>The person realizes that there is a potential problem on the track.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the female voice announce?

<p>The female voice announces the presence of an object on the track.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the person's immediate response to the train approaching?

<p>The person realizes the urgency and takes action.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How many tracks are being looked at currently?

<p>Two tracks are being looked at.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of feeds are being surveyed?

<p>The feeds being surveyed are live feeds.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What do the workers do?

<p>The workers start coming.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person do after checking their phone?

<p>The person goes to see what the message is.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the person do after realizing the urgency of the situation?

<p>The person goes out to address the potential problem on the track.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

The Trolley Problem

  • The trolley problem is a thought experiment that raises questions about ethics and decision-making
  • The classic scenario involves a runaway train that is headed towards five people on the track, and the only way to save them is to divert the train onto a side track where one person is standing
  • The dilemma is whether to do nothing and allow the five people to die, or to actively divert the train and kill one person

The History of the Trolley Problem

  • The trolley problem was first proposed by British philosopher Philippa Foot in 1967
  • The scenario has been used to explore questions about ethics, morality, and the nature of human decision-making

The Experiment

  • The experiment described in the text involves creating a realistic simulation of the trolley problem
  • Participants are placed in a remote switching station and are told to monitor the tracks and make decisions about switching the train
  • The participants are unaware that they are part of an experiment and believe they are participating in a focus group about high-speed rail
  • The experiment is designed to test how people react in a real-world scenario, rather than just responding to a hypothetical question

The Design of the Experiment

  • The experiment uses a combination of live actors and video footage to create a realistic simulation of the trolley problem
  • The participants are given a brief introduction to the switching station and are shown how to operate the switches
  • The crisis is triggered when a warning is issued about an object on the track, followed by the approach of the train
  • The participant is left alone to make a decision about what to do

The Results

  • The first participant, Elsa, is described as feeling scared and pressured to make a decision
  • Elsa decides to switch the train to the side track, saving the five people but killing one
  • The experimenters observe Elsa's reactions and interview her after the experiment to gather more data

The Goals of the Experiment

  • The experiment is designed to explore how people behave when faced with difficult decisions
  • The researchers want to know whether people will act differently in a real-world scenario compared to how they respond to a hypothetical question
  • The experiment is also exploring the psychological effects of making difficult decisions on individuals### The Trolley Problem Experiment
  • The experiment was designed to test the trolley problem, a thought experiment in ethics, in a real-life setting.
  • The trolley problem is a classic philosophical dilemma that asks: Would you divert a runaway train onto a side track, killing one person, or do nothing and allow the train to kill five people on the main track?

The Setup

  • The experiment took place in an abandoned railroad line.
  • Actors were dressed as railroad workers and placed on the tracks.
  • The participants were shown how switch points work and were told they were part of a focus group for a new high-speed rail system.
  • The participants were made to believe they were watching live feeds of trains from different tracks.

The Crisis

  • At a given time, the switch operator would leave the participant alone in the switching station.
  • A crisis would occur, where a train would be barreling down the tracks, and workers would be on both tracks (five on one, one on the other).
  • The participant would have to decide whether to switch the train, killing one person, or do nothing and allow the train to kill five people.

The Hypothesis

  • Dr. Cason, a psychologist, hypothesized that people would either immediately leave the station and not want to get back inside or freeze in action, not knowing what to do.

The First Participant

  • The first participant, Elsa, was told to wait for 20 minutes and was given a tour of the switching station.
  • She was left alone in the switching station, and the crisis was triggered.

Ethics and Safety

  • The experiment was designed to minimize psychological harm to the participants.
  • The participants were screened for psychological conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
  • A trauma counselor was on-site to provide support to the participants.
  • The experiment was reviewed by an ethics board and a university ethics committee.

The Purpose

  • The experiment aimed to reveal the difference between instinct and philosophical reflection.

  • The goal was to train people to act in a way that aligns with their philosophical beliefs.

  • The experiment had implications for mass transit, self-driving cars, and other areas where decisions have to be made in a split second.### Experiment on Decision-Making in Crisis Situations

  • The experiment involves a simulated train station with two tracks, where a participant is put in charge of switching the tracks to divert an oncoming train

  • The goal is to test how people make decisions in crisis situations, particularly when faced with difficult moral dilemmas

Participant Elsa's Experience

  • Elsa is given a lesson on how to switch the tracks and is then left alone to make a decision when an object is reported on the track
  • She initially hesitates but eventually switches the track to divert the train, saving the lives of several workers on the original track
  • Elsa's reaction is typical of someone taking deliberate action to sacrifice one person to save five others

Common Reactions in Crisis Situations

  • Many participants exhibited paralysis in the face of danger, failing to take action even when the train is approaching
  • Some participants attributed responsibility to others, assuming that someone else would take control of the situation
  • Others engaged in self-soothing behaviors, such as singing, to cope with the stress of the situation

Attribution and Responsibility

  • When confronted with the moral dilemma, many participants attributed responsibility to others or assumed that technology (e.g., sensors on the train) would prevent the accident
  • This behavior is known as attribution, where individuals assume that others are responsible for taking action or have already done so
  • Participants may also avoid taking responsibility due to fear of making the wrong decision

The Decision-Making Process

  • Decision-making in crisis situations involves a complex interplay of emotional, cognitive, and motivational factors
  • Participants' reactions ranged from quick action to paralysis, with some exhibiting a "frozen pose" in the face of danger
  • The experiment highlights the importance of understanding how people make decisions in high-pressure situations.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

Test your decision-making skills and see if you can make the right choice in this life-or-death situation. Find out what motivated your decision to switch tracks and potentially save more lives. Challenge yourself and discover if you were able to make the right call under pressure.

More Like This

Life-or-Death Decisions
3 questions
Life or Death
20 questions

Life or Death

BestPerformingPolarBear avatar
BestPerformingPolarBear
Life and Death in Literature Quiz
3 questions
Life, Death, and Society Quiz
26 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser