Legal Logic: Concepts and Applications

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

¿Cómo contribuye la lógica jurídica a la expresión del pensamiento, según la concepción aristotélica?

  • Facilita la expresión del pensamiento de manera subjetiva, adaptándose a interpretaciones individuales.
  • Fomenta la expresión del pensamiento de manera intuitiva, priorizando la creatividad sobre la coherencia.
  • Permite expresar el pensamiento de forma exclusivamente filosófica, desligada de la razón práctica.
  • Ayuda a expresar el pensamiento de manera racional, concibiéndose como una ciencia por diversos filósofos y lógicos. (correct)

En el contexto de la toma de decisiones y el conocimiento humano, ¿cómo se puede aprovechar la lógica?

  • Limitándose a su aplicación en disciplinas abstractas, excluyendo las científicas y tecnológicas.
  • Ignorando su relevancia en las disciplinas científicas y tecnológicas, enfocándose únicamente en el pensamiento abstracto.
  • Restringiéndose al ámbito de la comunicación interpersonal, sin influir en la toma de decisiones complejas.
  • Aprovechándose en varios aspectos de la comunicación, la toma de decisiones y el conocimiento humano en diversas disciplinas. (correct)

¿De qué se encarga el objeto de estudio de la lógica jurídica?

  • De facilitar la toma de decisiones subjetivas basadas en la intuición del jurista.
  • De examinar las operaciones intelectuales del jurista desde un punto de vista formal y los productos mentales derivados de ellas. (correct)
  • De examinar el razonamiento de otros campos desligados del derecho.
  • De analizar exclusivamente los juicios y raciocinios jurídicos, dejando de lado los conceptos y definiciones.

Para esclarecer la verdad de un hecho y la causa del delito, ¿para qué se aplica la lógica?

<p>Para esclarecer la verdad de un hecho, y la causa del delito (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Según Hans Kelsen, ¿qué ocurrió con la conexión entre la lógica y el derecho?

<p>Fue reemplazada lícita e ilícitamente para crear la Jurisprudencia. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

¿Cuál es la relevancia de la lógica en el Derecho según lo expuesto?

<p>Es una herramienta importante y una cualidad del derecho a la de ser lógico. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

En el contexto de la creación de una sentencia, ¿qué rol desempeñan los juristas?

<p>Pueden estar orientados a aplicar o intervenir en la aplicación de la norma a casos concretos. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

En el contexto del principio de no contradicción, ¿qué implicancia tiene la concordancia entre las premisas para obtener una conclusión válida?

<p>Si no existe concordancia entre dos juicios, uno de ellos es falso y siempre se debe buscar una concordancia del pensamiento. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

¿Qué implica el Principio de Identidad del Imperativo en el ámbito jurídico?

<p>Todo mandato en que lo mandado es exactamente idéntico a lo que se realiza, es decir se obedece lo establecido; cumplimiento obligatorio. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

¿Cómo se determina la oposición contradictoria entre dos normas, según el Principio de Contradicción de lo lógico jurídico?

<p>Cuando regulan el mismo ámbito material, espacial y temporal, donde una permite y la otra prohíbe. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

¿Qué es lógica jurídica?

It helps to express thought rationally. Aristotelian logic is conceived as a science.

¿Qué es la relevancia de la lógica?

It is a activity important in the daily life of practical lawyers, judges, or prosecutors.

Dimensions of Lógica Jurídica

Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic aspects of legal language and reasoning.

¿Qué es razonamiento?

It is a natural human activity involving the habitual use of logic.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Principio de Identidad

A concept, idea, or object is always identical to its nature. Relates to the truth and objective validity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Principio de Identidad del Imperativo

A mandate where what's ordered is exactly what's done. Compliance with norms is obligatory.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Principio de Identidad de lo lógico jurídico

Law allows what isn't forbidden; valid if law indicates it and citizens/authorities respect it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Principio de no Contradicción

Two judgments where one affirms what the other denies cannot be simultaneously true.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Principio de Contradicción Imperativa

The order is contradictory if it commands and, at the same time, doesn't command a specific action.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Principio de Contradicción de lo lógico jurídico

Two norms contradict when regulating the same scope, one allows, the other prohibits.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Legal logic aids in expressing rational thought, with Aristotelian logic conceptualized as a science

Utility of Logic

  • Logic benefits scientific, technological, abstract, and thought-based disciplines in communication, decision-making, and human understanding.

Object of Study of Logic

  • Legal thoughts that facilitate reasoned decisions, focusing on the jurist's intellectual operations and their mental products like concepts, definitions, judgments, and legal reasoning are subject of Logic.

Generalities of Logic

  • Explaining reasons
  • Determining the validity of events
  • Executing law rationally
  • Discussing and solving problems
  • Understanding the relationship between state and law

Application of Logic

  • Logic is applied to elucidate the truth of an event and the cause of a crime.

Conception of Logic

  • Logic is viewed as a philosophical discipline.

Origin of Logic

  • Logic originates from the Greek word "Lobos," expressing thought based on science.

Relevancy of Logic

  • Logic is important in the daily life of legal professionals like lawyers, judges, and prosecutors.
  • Syntactics
  • Semantics
  • Pragmatics

Hans Kelsen on Logic and Law

  • Hans Kelsen stated the connection between logic and law was used, legitimately or illegitimately in creating jurisprudence.

Reasoning

  • Reasoning is a natural human activity that uses logic.

Relevancy of Logic in Law

  • Logic is important in law as law should be logical, jurists, lawyers, and judges use logic when applying contradictory norms, or when one deontology or logic of norms is absorbed into another.

Limits of Logic in Law

  • Logic addresses the context of justification from a formal perspective, using the principle of deducibility as a standard for correction.

Key Aspects When Creating a Sentence

  • Professional Activity: Legal experts inform on a legal norm's scope, referencing prior cases to understand interpretations.
  • A judge's role is to apply the law to specific cases with explanations which ensures decisions are not arbitrary.
  • Jurists may apply or intervene law to concrete cases
  • A judge's role is to apply laws, supported by explanations to ensure decisions are rule-based.
  • Legal logic is a legal instrument used to find formal intellectual operations of the jurist, along with resulting products like concepts, definitions, legal relations, and judgments.

Types of Logic

  • Jurists: study the reasoning of legal professionals, analyzing normative propositions.
  • Logic of Law: Is a material logic with principal rules in formal logic as a research method using reason and symbolic language for legal knowledge, enables precise results and reasoning for decisions.
  • Principle of Identity
  • Principle of Identity of the Imperative
  • Principle of Identity of Legal Logic
  • Principle of Non-Contradiction
  • Principle of Imperative Contradiction
  • Principle of Contradiction of Legal Logic
  • Principle of Third Excluded
  • Principle of Third Excluded of the Imperative
  • Principle of the Third Excluded from Legal Logic

Principle of Identity

  • A concept, idea, or object is always identical to its characteristic or nature with objective truth and validity from object's ontological structure

Principle of Identity of the Imperative

  • Every mandate is exactly identical to what is done, meaning obedience to what is established which signifies required compliance, like complying with the hierarchy of norms.
  • The norm permits that which is not legally prohibited, it is a valid norm because everything indicated in the law must be respected by all citizens and authorities that create it.

Principle of Non-Contradiction

  • Two claims, where one affirms what the other denies, cannot simultaneously be true, meaning that one is false if the judgments do not match.

Principle of Imperative Contradiction

  • A command is contradictory if it orders and does not order a certain action avoiding obedience and validity.
  • Two contradictory rules regulate similar material, spatial, and temporal aspects, one permitting an action and the other prohibiting it for similar subjects

Principle of the Excluded Third

  • Definitions complement each other because the first indicates what the second implies, on this basis, only one of the judgments is true.

Principle of the Third Excluded of the Imperative

  • Two contradictory rules cannot be invalid or inapplicable simultaneously and must have its application observed.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

More Like This

Lógica en General y Jurídica
5 questions
Lógica Jurídica
24 questions

Lógica Jurídica

InnovativeDecagon avatar
InnovativeDecagon
Lógica Jurídica
42 questions

Lógica Jurídica

InnovativeDecagon avatar
InnovativeDecagon
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser