Legal Evidence and Character Quiz
41 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In the context of expert testimony, what is the significance of the phrase 'sufficiently reliable that it is helpful to the trier of fact'?

  • It highlights that expert opinions must be based on generally accepted theories and practices within their field.
  • It means that the expert's opinion must be supported by a formal scientific study or research paper.
  • It signifies that the expert's opinion should be clear and understandable to the judge or jury even if it is complex.
  • It emphasizes that expert opinions must be based on strong, verifiable evidence and not just on speculation. (correct)

    • In the context of expert witness qualifications, what is the implication of the statement 'qualifications need not be formal or academic'?

  • That the expert needs to have a significant amount of professional experience in the field.
  • That the expert must have a formal education in the field of expertise, but work experience is not essential.
  • That the expert must hold professional certifications recognized by relevant governing bodies.
  • That the expert must possess relevant practical experience and skills, even if they lack formal education. (correct)

    • Which of these statements MOST accurately describes the concept of 'reasonable certainty or probability' in expert testimony?

  • The expert must be able to demonstrate that their opinion is consistent with the prevailing scientific consensus.
  • The expert must be able to provide a precise numerical estimate of the likelihood of a scenario or outcome.
  • The expert must be able to express their opinion without any reservations or doubts about its correctness.
  • The expert must be able to confidently state their opinion based on a high level of certainty and knowledge. (correct)

    • Which of these scenarios WOULD NOT be considered an acceptable source of factual basis for an expert opinion?

    <p>Facts based on hypothetical scenarios created by the attorney to test the expert's knowledge. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Identify the PRIMARY distinction between using a learned treatise to rebut an opposing expert's testimony and using it for its truth?

    <p>Rebutting an expert's testimony focuses on discrediting their opinion, while using it for its truth seeks to establish a certain fact. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of these scenarios IS NOT a permissible way to utilize a learned treatise in a court case?

    <p>A party submits a treatise to the jury for their independent review and consideration during deliberations. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT an exception to the hearsay rule when using a learned treatise?

    <p>An attorney reads a passage from the treatise to the jury to prove the truth of the matter asserted. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main purpose of the 'judicial notice' exception when using a learned treatise?

    <p>To establish the reliability and acceptance of the treatise within the expert's field of practice. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the KEY limitation associated with the use of learned treatises in court proceedings?

    <p>They can only be introduced through the testimony of an expert witness, not through a direct reading by the attorney. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements about the admissibility of lay opinions on the subject of agency or agreement is ACCURATE?

    <p>Lay opinions regarding agency or agreement are generally NOT admissible in court proceedings. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary limitation of cross-examination as outlined in the content?

    <p>It is restricted to the scope of both direct examination and testing the witness's credibility. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which type of witness can be impeached by a party according to the content?

    <p>A witness who is adverse to the party or has been identified with an adverse party. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is true about the collateral matters doctrine in cross-examination?

    <p>No extrinsic evidence is allowed to contradict a witness on collateral matters. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for prior statements of identification made by a witness to be admissible?

    <p>The witness must be present in court and available for cross-examination. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a critical condition for a prior inconsistent statement to be admissible for its truth?

    <p>It must have been made under oath in a formal setting. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a civil case, when is character evidence admissible?

    <p>When character is directly at issue in the case, such as in defamation or negligent entrustment. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a limitation on the admissibility of settlement discussions?

    <p>An admission made in the course of settlement discussions must be accompanied by an offer to pay hospital or medical expenses. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a criminal case, when can the prosecution introduce evidence of a defendant's bad character?

    <p>When the defendant offers evidence of their good character. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a method of proving character?

    <p>Psychometric assessments. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A defendant in a criminal case is accused of assault. The defendant's attorney seeks to introduce evidence that the defendant is a peaceful and non-violent person. What is this evidence called?

    <p>Character evidence. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A plaintiff in a civil case sues a defendant for defamation. The plaintiff seeks to introduce evidence that the defendant has a history of making false and defamatory statements. Would this evidence be admissible?

    <p>Yes, this evidence is admissible because it is relevant to the plaintiff's claim. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a civil case, a defendant admits liability during settlement discussions but does not offer to pay any money. Is this admission admissible in court?

    <p>Yes, because the admission was made during settlement discussions and is relevant to the case. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a factor considered when determining the admissibility of secondary evidence of a writing?

    <p>Whether the writing was properly authenticated (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the Parol Evidence Rule, when is prior contemporaneous negotiation or agreement admissible?

    <p>To explain an ambiguous term in the written agreement (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following scenarios is an example of when the Parol Evidence Rule would NOT apply?

    <p>A party claims the written agreement was subject to a later verbal modification (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a requirement for a witness to be considered competent under the Federal Rules of Evidence?

    <p>The witness must be able to recall the events they are testifying about with perfect accuracy (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is generally NOT permitted on direct examination?

    <p>Leading questions (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following groups of people are NOT generally considered competent witnesses?

    <p>Judges presiding over the case (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Dead Man Act is a state law that:

    <p>Prohibits a witness from testifying about personal communication with a deceased person (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following questions would be considered improper due to its form?

    <p>Did you see the car run the red light and then hit the pedestrian? (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a reason why leading questions are sometimes permitted?

    <p>To clarify an ambiguous or confusing answer (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT considered improper questioning?

    <p>Questions that seek clarification of a previous answer (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a proper authentication method for documentary evidence?

    <p>Evidence that the document is at least 15 years old, regular on its face, and was found in a place where such writings are kept (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When can a map, chart, or model be admitted into evidence?

    <p>When the proponent of the evidence can demonstrate that the map, chart, or model accurately depicts the scene in question. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstances can photographs be admissible as evidence?

    <p>Photos are admissible as evidence if they are authenticated by showing the camera was operating correctly and the photo was developed from film obtained from that camera, even if no one can authenticate the scene. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a crucial factor in determining the admissibility of photos, diagrams, maps, etc. as evidence?

    <p>Whether the evidence is relevant to the issues being debated in the case. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a common misconception about the admissibility of real evidence?

    <p>Real evidence is always admissible as long as it is relevant to the case. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of documentary evidence, what are the three key questions to consider before admitting it?

    <p>Is it authenticated? Is it hearsay? Is it the best evidence? (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a possible reason for excluding real evidence from a trial?

    <p>The evidence has been tampered with and is no longer reliable. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is the 'ancient documents rule' considered a valid method for authenticating documents?

    <p>It is a way to avoid having to locate witnesses who were present when the document was created. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the purpose of requiring authentication for documentary evidence?

    <p>To establish that the document is what it purports to be and is not a forgery or fabrication. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flashcards

    Offers to Compromise

    Proposals made during settlement discussions to resolve a dispute without going to trial.

    Character Evidence in Court

    Evidence used to prove a person's character traits in legal proceedings, admissible under specific conditions.

    Admissibility Limits

    Certain limitations on what evidence can be admitted in court concerning offers and character.

    Claim Requirements for Evidence

    For evidence concerning a claim to be admissible, the claim must be indicated, disputed, and not simply a payment offer.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Character Evidence in Civil Cases

    Generally not admissible to prove conduct, but allowed if character is directly at issue, like in defamation claims.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Prosecution's Use of Character Evidence

    Bad character evidence is generally inadmissible unless the accused presents evidence of good character first.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Methods to Prove Character

    Character can be proven through specific acts, opinion testimony, or reputation in the community.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Real Proof

    Tangible evidence like photos and diagrams used in court.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Admissibility of Evidence

    Evidence allowed in court based on relevance and legality.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Documentary Evidence

    Written material relevant to the case, must be authenticated.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Authentication

    Proof that a document is what it claims to be, necessary for admission.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Hearsay

    An out-of-court statement offered for truth, usually inadmissible.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Best Evidence Rule

    Only the original document is admissible to prove its contents.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Eyewitness Testimony

    Firsthand accounts by someone who directly observed the event.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Ancient Documents Rule

    Documents over 20 years old may be admissible if found in proper places.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    X-ray Evidence

    Medical images requiring proof of process accuracy for admissibility.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Cross-Examination

    A party's right to question a witness who testifies live.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Scope of Cross-Examination

    Limits the examination to the direct testimony and witness credibility.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Collateral Matters Doctrine

    Limits contradiction of a witness to essential points; no extrinsic evidence allowed.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Impeachment of Witness

    The process of challenging the credibility of a witness.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Extrinsic Evidence in Impeachment

    Using additional witnesses to discredit/test testimony of an original witness.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Parol Evidence Rule

    The principle that prohibits prior agreements from altering a written contract.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Admissibility exceptions

    Situations when prior agreements can be used: to complete, explain, reform, or show modification.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Competency of Witnesses

    A witness must have reliable personal knowledge and declare truthfulness.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Children Testifying

    Children may testify based on their capacity determined by a judge.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Insane Person Testifying

    An insane person can testify if they understand the obligation to speak truthfully.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Dead Man Act

    Bars interested parties from testifying about communications with deceased if against the deceased’s successor.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Leading Questions in Court

    Generally improper on direct examination but allowed on cross-examination.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Improper Question Types

    Includes misleading, compound, argumentative, or embarrassing questions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Witness Testimony Truthfulness

    Witnesses must declare they will testify truthfully to be competent.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Examination of Witnesses

    Controlled by the judge, ensuring the integrity of questioning.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Lay Opinions

    Non-expert opinions not admissible about agency or agreements.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Expert Testimony Requirements

    Four basic criteria for expert opinion to be admissible in court.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Methodology Reliability

    The underlying methods of an expert's opinion must be reliable.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Witness Qualification

    An expert must demonstrate sufficient skill or experience, not just formal education.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Certainty or Probability

    Expert opinions must show reasonable certainty, not mere speculation.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Factual Basis for Opinion

    An expert's opinion must be supported by facts either known or reliable in their field.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Learned Treatises

    Textbooks that can rebut or impeach an opponent's expert if properly referenced.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Hearsay Exception

    Learned treatises can be used for truth if relied upon by an expert.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Judicial Notice Limitations

    Judicial notice must generally be taken for treatises to be admitted; they can't just be read.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Cross-Examination on Treatises

    Using treatises to elicit admissions during the opposing expert's cross-examination.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Study Notes

    Relevance

    • Evidence is relevant if it tends to make a material fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence

    • Similar acts may be relevant in cases involving cause and effect, common plans or schemes, instrumentality, intent, impossibility, value, habit, or business routine.

    • Evidence must show substantial identity of material circumstances.

    • Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or cumulative evidence.

    • Evidence of liability insurance is inadmissible to show negligence, but admissible to show ownership/control or to impeach credibility.

    Character Evidence

    • Character evidence is inadmissible to prove conduct, but it can be if character is directly in issue (e.g., defamation, negligent entrustment).
    • Character can be proven by reputation, opinion, or specific acts.
    • Determine the specific trait of character at issue in the case.
    • Character evidence may be offered to impeach credibility of a witness.
    • Methods of proving character include specific acts, opinion testimony, or the person's general community reputation.

    Judicial Notice

    • Courts can take judicial notice of indisputable facts, those known by the community or readily verifiable.
    • In civil cases, judicially noticed facts are conclusive.
    • In criminal cases, jurors may but aren't required to accept judicially noticed facts as conclusive.

    Real Evidence

    • Includes physical objects (direct or circumstantial) to show a fact (original & copies, or demonstrative).
    • Authentication is required: witness testimony or unbroken chain of possession.
    • Balancing inconvenience of producing in court v probative value needed.

    Documentary Evidence

    • Authenticated writings are admitted as evidence.
    • Authentication methods include admission by opposing party, eyewitness testimony, handwriting evidence, etc.
    • Ancient documents, self-authenticating documents (as official publications or certified copies), and documents created contemporaneously are exceptions to authentication requirements.
    • Secondary evidence of a writing is admissible if the original is unavailable.
    • Best Evidence Rule requires original writing/documents for its content.

    Testimonial Evidence

    • Witnesses are competent to testify if they have personal knowledge, understand the duty to tell the truth, and can communicate their testimony. Special groups (children, insane persons) may have competency determined by the judge.

    • Leading questions are generally not allowed on direct examination but can be used in limited circumstances (i.e., introductory matter, hostile witnesses, refreshed memory).

    • Cross-examination occurs to question witnesses about their testimony and test their credibility. The scope usually is limited to matters covered in direct testimony.

    • If witness refuses to answer, or doesn't respond to question properly, the opposing attorney can object to the testimony.

    • Prior statements are admissible to test credibility.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Evidence Long OL PDF

    Description

    Test your understanding of the relevance of evidence and character evidence in legal contexts. This quiz covers key principles regarding admissibility, probative value, and the nature of character evidence. Understand how these concepts apply in various legal situations.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser