Podcast
Questions and Answers
What defines the standard of care for a professional in a negligence case?
What defines the standard of care for a professional in a negligence case?
In the context of negligence per se, which of the following is NOT a requirement to establish a breach?
In the context of negligence per se, which of the following is NOT a requirement to establish a breach?
Which situation would most likely qualify as medical malpractice?
Which situation would most likely qualify as medical malpractice?
What is implied in the concept of the 'reasonably prudent person' standard?
What is implied in the concept of the 'reasonably prudent person' standard?
Signup and view all the answers
Which factor is NOT considered when evaluating a breach of duty in a negligence claim?
Which factor is NOT considered when evaluating a breach of duty in a negligence claim?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Duty (Question of Law)
- Judges determine the existence of a legal duty.
- A duty is imposed to act reasonably.
Standard of Care
- Reasonably Prudent Person: The expected behavior of a typical person in similar circumstances.
- Knowledge (as a legal matter): Relevant knowledge is considered part of the standard of care.
- Custom and Usage: Industry practices and customs can influence the standard of care.
-
Negligence Per Se (Statute):
- Defendant (D) violates a law.
- The law was designed to prevent harm of the type caused.
- Plaintiff (P) was within the protected class.
- The violation directly caused the harm (proximate cause).
Professional Standard of Care
- General Professional Standard: Professionals are expected to uphold the learning, skill, and ability typical for a competent member of their profession, exercising due care.
- Specialist Standard: The standard for specialists is higher. It considers a specialist's expertise.
-
Medical Malpractice: A doctor acts (or fails to act) in a way that falls short of the expected standard of care, causing harm to the patient.
- A medical professional is responsible for doing what standard practice in the medical field dictates, failing to adhere to this causes liability.
- A medical professional is responsible for disclosing all material risks of a treatment and that failing to do this can result in liability if the patient in question would have avoided the treatment under consideration had they been informed of all risks.
- The disclosed risk must have been material and influenced the patient's choice.
- A lack of disclosed risk and a resultant choice that caused harm to the patient would make the disclosing party liable.
Breach of Duty
- Breach: Failure to meet the established standard of care.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your understanding of the legal concepts of duty and standard of care. This quiz covers the expectations of a reasonably prudent person, the implications of negligence per se, and professional standards for various practitioners. Evaluate your knowledge on how these principles apply in legal contexts.