12 Questions
Who approved the Resolution finding probable cause for syndicated Estafa against the private respondents and Tafalla?
Arellano
Which court did the Information accusing the private respondents and Tafalla of Estafa get filed before?
Regional Trial Court of Quezon City
What is the main reason for Regino Sy Catiis filing a petition for review on certiorari?
To seek nullification of a court decision
Which court allowed the private respondents to post bail in this case?
Regional Trial Court, Branch 96, Quezon City
What offense were the private respondents accused of in the complaint filed by Regino Sy Catiis?
Syndicated Estafa
Which corporation was NOT mentioned in the Information as being used for foreign exchange trading?
Belkin Profits Limited
Under what Article of the Revised Penal Code was the crime of Estafa committed by the accused?
Article 315
Who approved the surety bond posted by the respondents for their release?
Executive Judge of the same court
How many persons were involved in the syndicated Estafa as stated in the Information?
At least three (3)
When did Assistant City Prosecutor Alessandro D. take action in this case?
October 10, 2001
Which entity was accused alongside the private respondents in the complaint?
Tafalla
What was the approximate amount defrauded from Regino Sy Catiis and several other persons?
$123,461.14
Explore the details of the legal case involving Regino Sy Catiis and the Court of Appeals, Bureau of Jail Management and Penology, and others. This quiz delves into the decision made on February 6, 2006, by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
