40 Questions
What is the primary concern when a document deviates from the expected structure?
The reader may not trust the document as much
What is the main difference between mandatory and discretionary rules?
Mandatory rules impose obligation, while discretionary rules provide a right to act.
What is the main purpose of the issue in an IRAC structure?
To draw the reader's attention to the legally determinative facts
What is the primary focus of effective application of a rule?
Thorough analysis of the elements of the rule.
What type of question examines the scope or interpretation of a law or legal principle?
Pure legal question
What is a typical example of a discretionary rule?
The right to elect or be elected.
What is the advantage of using the IRAC structure?
It helps readers to focus on the relevant issues
What is the relationship between the issue and the legally determinative facts?
The issue identifies the legally determinative facts
Why do students often make mistakes in applying rules?
They do not clearly understand the elements of the rule.
What type of question does the example 'whether the nonpartisan principle is violated by the presence of the army general in party meeting' represent?
Fact-based question
What was Birhan doing when Ruth was listening to music?
Studying.
Why did Birhan pound on Ruth's door?
Ruth was playing music too loudly.
Why do lawyers expect a certain structure in an office memorandum of law?
Because it is expected by the legal profession
What happens when a document deviates from the expected structure?
The reader will have to work harder to understand the content
What was the outcome of Birhan's action?
Ruth suffered substantial injury.
What is the legal implication of Birhan's action?
Birhan is guilty of felonious assault.
What makes it challenging to understand the rules?
The variety of ways judges express the same rule
What opportunity does the variety of rule statements provide to lawyers?
The opportunity to argue a favorable interpretation
Why is it essential to understand the purpose behind a rule?
To unravel ambiguities within the rule
What can lead to ambiguity in a rule, even if the rule-maker is careful with language?
The structure of the rule
What is essential to consider when interpreting a rule?
The problem the rule-maker was trying to solve
Why might the meaning of a rule be unclear, even if the language is clear?
Because the rule's purpose is unclear
What can help clarify the meaning of a rule?
Understanding the problem the rule-maker was trying to solve
What is an example of a situation where the meaning of a rule might be unclear?
A person riding a bicycle through a park
What is the purpose of pleadings in a lawsuit?
To establish claims and defenses of the parties
What is a brief typically countered by?
A written argument by the opposing party
What is the job of lawyers, popularly known as?
Predicting
What type of writing critically expresses how a certain matter could be resolved?
Predictive writing
What is the purpose of a bond, as seen in the example?
To attend a court session
What is a trial brief usually filed with?
A trial court
What do people wish to know when they come to a lawyer?
Under what circumstances they can win a case
What is usually filed with an appellate court?
An appellate brief
What is the purpose of using the technique mentioned in the text?
To discredit the opponent's legal strategy or factual construction
Why is it a stronger persuasive tactic to suggest inconsistency rather than stating it directly?
Because it allows the reader or adjudicator to come to their own conclusion
What is the difference between the two examples provided in the text?
One is a direct accusation, while the other is a subtle suggestion
What is 'negative information' in the context of legal argumentation?
Information that hurts one's own client's position
What is the purpose of using transition words and phrases like 'However…' and 'Even though…'?
To deemphasize negative information
Why are transition words and phrases like 'However…' and 'Even though…' effective in legal argumentation?
Because they help to downplay negative information
What is the difference between the two examples provided in the 'De-emphasis of Negative Information' section?
One is damaging to the defendant, while the other is not
What is the goal of using transition words and phrases like 'However…' and 'Even though…' in legal argumentation?
To deemphasize negative information and present a stronger position
This quiz is about filling in a legal bond form, which is used to secure a bond and ensure attendance at a police station or court. The form outlines the conditions and penalties of default.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
