Podcast
Questions and Answers
Match the ethical rules with their descriptions:
Match the ethical rules with their descriptions:
Rule 1.1 = Requires a lawyer to provide competent representation to a client, including legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Rule 5.4 = Addresses the professional independence of a lawyer, restricting fee sharing with nonlawyers and partnerships where nonlawyers engage in the practice of law. Rule 5.5 = Deals with the unauthorized practice of law and multijurisdictional practice, prohibiting practice in jurisdictions without admission, with exceptions for temporary practice. Rule 1.16 = Covers declining or terminating representation, outlining mandatory and permissive withdrawal conditions.
Match these concepts to the appropriate ethical rule:
Match these concepts to the appropriate ethical rule:
Reasonable Belief of Consultation = The attorney-client relationship begins when a person reasonably believes that they are consulting a lawyer for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or representation. Competence Requirement = Lawyers are not required to have prior experience in all fields of law but must ensure they reach the necessary competency. Profit-Sharing = Lawyers cannot share legal fees with nonlawyers except under limited exceptions (such as retirement benefits or profit-sharing arrangements. Explicit Disclaimer = A clear and explicit disclaimer may prevent an attorney-client relationship.
Match the term with the most appropiate definition:
Match the term with the most appropiate definition:
Pro Hac Vice = Temporary admission allowing an out-of-state attorney to practice law in a specific case before a court without being licensed in that jurisdiction. Rule 1.3 = Requires a lawyer to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. Rule 5.1 = Requires a supervising attorney to make reasonable efforts to ensure that all lawyers in the firm comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rule 1.1 Rule 1.8(h)(1) = Prohibits a lawyer from making an agreement with a client that prospectively limits the lawyer’s liability for malpractice unless the client is independently represented in making the agreement.
Match each concept regarding client solicitation with its description:
Match each concept regarding client solicitation with its description:
Match these concepts regarding attorney fees with their definitions:
Match these concepts regarding attorney fees with their definitions:
Match the confidentiality actions with the appropiate ruling
Match the confidentiality actions with the appropiate ruling
Match the actions with the privilege
Match the actions with the privilege
Match each Rule with it’s proper description:
Match each Rule with it’s proper description:
Match each of the following ABA Model Rules with the correct topic that it covers:
Match each of the following ABA Model Rules with the correct topic that it covers:
Match the descriptions with the appropriate term.
Match the descriptions with the appropriate term.
Match these concepts to the appropriate step when analyzing an attorney’s ethical obligations:
Match these concepts to the appropriate step when analyzing an attorney’s ethical obligations:
Match each scenario with the correct answer:
Match each scenario with the correct answer:
Match each rule with its corresponding description:
Match each rule with its corresponding description:
Match the following scenarios with the relevant ethical considerations:
Match the following scenarios with the relevant ethical considerations:
Match the scenarios to the appropriate Rules:
Match the scenarios to the appropriate Rules:
Match the Rules with what they address regarding Fees:
Match the Rules with what they address regarding Fees:
Match each case decision with its core holding:
Match each case decision with its core holding:
Match the situations to the rules:
Match the situations to the rules:
Match the concepts with their correct description.
Match the concepts with their correct description.
Match the correct Pro Bono activity with the corresponding rule
Match the correct Pro Bono activity with the corresponding rule
Match the term with the definition
Match the term with the definition
Match the terms
Match the terms
Match the following
Match the following
Matching according to Midterm Takeaways
Matching according to Midterm Takeaways
Match terms to description.
Match terms to description.
Match to the correct part:
Match to the correct part:
Rule for attorneys
Rule for attorneys
Match the ethical rules with their corresponding descriptions:
Match the ethical rules with their corresponding descriptions:
Match the legal terms with their definitions:
Match the legal terms with their definitions:
Match the scenarios with the relevant ethical rule or principle that applies:
Match the scenarios with the relevant ethical rule or principle that applies:
Match the lawyer actions with the potential ethical violation:
Match the lawyer actions with the potential ethical violation:
Match the scenarios with the appropriate application of Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information):
Match the scenarios with the appropriate application of Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information):
Match the given scenarios to the relevant Rules of Professional Conduct regarding accepting or terminating representation:
Match the given scenarios to the relevant Rules of Professional Conduct regarding accepting or terminating representation:
Match the activities with whether they constitute the unauthorized practice of law for an attorney only admitted in Florida but engaging in legal activities in California:
Match the activities with whether they constitute the unauthorized practice of law for an attorney only admitted in Florida but engaging in legal activities in California:
Match the scenarios with their ethical outcomes regarding fees and billing:
Match the scenarios with their ethical outcomes regarding fees and billing:
Match each scenario with the relevant guideline regarding advertising and solicitation:
Match each scenario with the relevant guideline regarding advertising and solicitation:
Match each situation with the relevant aspect of attorney competence:
Match each situation with the relevant aspect of attorney competence:
Match the ethical rules with their descriptions related to conflicts of interest:
Match the ethical rules with their descriptions related to conflicts of interest:
Match the rules with their applications concerning clients with diminished capacity:
Match the rules with their applications concerning clients with diminished capacity:
Match the following scenarios with the relevant rule or legal principle:
Match the following scenarios with the relevant rule or legal principle:
Match the legal scenarios with the relevant ethical considerations:
Match the legal scenarios with the relevant ethical considerations:
Match the description to the concept
Match the description to the concept
Match descriptions to the type of the work needed:
Match descriptions to the type of the work needed:
Match the terms to their descriptions:
Match the terms to their descriptions:
Match the duties to the type of situation:
Match the duties to the type of situation:
Match the rule with its example application:
Match the rule with its example application:
Match the action with appropriate Rule.
Match the action with appropriate Rule.
Match the Rule to it's description:
Match the Rule to it's description:
Match the description to the phrase.
Match the description to the phrase.
Match the scenario to the potential attorney violation.
Match the scenario to the potential attorney violation.
Link Legal Concepts to the Rule.
Link Legal Concepts to the Rule.
Link Legal Principles to Scenarios
Link Legal Principles to Scenarios
Match the rule with one of its applications!
Match the rule with one of its applications!
Match the type of legal service with the corresponding rule that might apply:
Match the type of legal service with the corresponding rule that might apply:
Match the type of attorney conduct with the potential ethical violation:
Match the type of attorney conduct with the potential ethical violation:
Match the scenario with the likely outcome regarding the attorney-client relationship:
Match the scenario with the likely outcome regarding the attorney-client relationship:
Match the hypothetical situation with the relevant rule regarding attorney competence:
Match the hypothetical situation with the relevant rule regarding attorney competence:
Match the circumstance of an attorney with the applicable rule regarding competency:
Match the circumstance of an attorney with the applicable rule regarding competency:
Match the lawyer conduct with its corresponding Rule 1.16 description regarding terminating representation:
Match the lawyer conduct with its corresponding Rule 1.16 description regarding terminating representation:
Match the attorney conduct with the possible ethical issue:
Match the attorney conduct with the possible ethical issue:
Match the attorney behavior with the relevant exception regarding unauthorized practice of law:
Match the attorney behavior with the relevant exception regarding unauthorized practice of law:
Match the advertising method with its permissibility under the Rules:
Match the advertising method with its permissibility under the Rules:
Associate the scenario with potential violations regarding client solicitation:
Associate the scenario with potential violations regarding client solicitation:
Match the billing practice with its ethical consideration:
Match the billing practice with its ethical consideration:
Match the fee or payment structure with its permissibility:
Match the fee or payment structure with its permissibility:
Match the action to the relevant rule concerning client property and funds:
Match the action to the relevant rule concerning client property and funds:
Match the communication scenario with its privilege status:
Match the communication scenario with its privilege status:
Match the attorney’s action with its consequence concerning the waiving of attorney-client privilege:
Match the attorney’s action with its consequence concerning the waiving of attorney-client privilege:
Match the scenario involving a client with diminished capacity with the appropriate ethical action a lawyer should take:
Match the scenario involving a client with diminished capacity with the appropriate ethical action a lawyer should take:
Associate the situation with the application of attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine:
Associate the situation with the application of attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine:
Relate the concept with its appropriate detail about Work Product:
Relate the concept with its appropriate detail about Work Product:
Match the attorney's reaction with potential disciplinary actions given disclosure of a client’s crimes:
Match the attorney's reaction with potential disciplinary actions given disclosure of a client’s crimes:
Flashcards
Business vs. Profession (Law)
Business vs. Profession (Law)
The legal profession has responsibilities beyond economic interests, holding special roles, responsibilities, and privileges regulated to protect the public and lawyers.
When does attorney-client relationship commence?
When does attorney-client relationship commence?
An attorney-client relationship begins when a person reasonably believes they are consulting a lawyer for legal advice, and the lawyer agrees expressly or impliedly.
Implied Attorney-Client Relationship
Implied Attorney-Client Relationship
The relationship can be implied if the client reasonably relies on the attorney’s legal advice, even without a formal agreement.
When does attorney-client relationship end?
When does attorney-client relationship end?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Continuing Duties After Termination
Continuing Duties After Termination
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.1: Competence
Rule 1.1: Competence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Assessing Competence
Assessing Competence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Prior Experience Requirement
Prior Experience Requirement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Maintaining Competence
Maintaining Competence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 5.4(a)(3): Profit-Sharing Exception
Rule 5.4(a)(3): Profit-Sharing Exception
Signup and view all the flashcards
Attorney-Client Relationship Formation
Attorney-Client Relationship Formation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Disclaimers & Competency
Disclaimers & Competency
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 5.4: Fee Sharing
Rule 5.4: Fee Sharing
Signup and view all the flashcards
Why Fee-Sharing is Restricted
Why Fee-Sharing is Restricted
Signup and view all the flashcards
Disclaimers
Disclaimers
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.16(a): Mandatory Withdrawal
Rule 1.16(a): Mandatory Withdrawal
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.16(b): Permissive Withdrawal
Rule 1.16(b): Permissive Withdrawal
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 6.2: Accepting Appointments
Rule 6.2: Accepting Appointments
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 5.5: Unauthorized Practice
Rule 5.5: Unauthorized Practice
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pro Hac Vice
Pro Hac Vice
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 5.5(c)(4): Temporary Practice
Rule 5.5(c)(4): Temporary Practice
Signup and view all the flashcards
Restatement §14: Relationship
Restatement §14: Relationship
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.3: Diligence
Rule 1.3: Diligence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 5.1(b): Supervisory Duty
Rule 5.1(b): Supervisory Duty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.8(h)(1): Malpractice
Rule 1.8(h)(1): Malpractice
Signup and view all the flashcards
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington
Signup and view all the flashcards
Duty of competence
Duty of competence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.2(a): Settlement
Rule 1.2(a): Settlement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.14: Diminished Capacity
Rule 1.14: Diminished Capacity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 5.7: Law-Related Services
Rule 5.7: Law-Related Services
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 7.3: Solicitation
Rule 7.3: Solicitation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 7.3(a): Pro Bono
Rule 7.3(a): Pro Bono
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 7.1: Misleading Ads
Rule 7.1: Misleading Ads
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 7.2: Advertising
Rule 7.2: Advertising
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 7.1: Firm Names
Rule 7.1: Firm Names
Signup and view all the flashcards
Expenses vs. Fees
Expenses vs. Fees
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingency Fees
Contingency Fees
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contract Lawyers
Contract Lawyers
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingency fee in a divorce
Contingency fee in a divorce
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 1.6(a): Confidentiality
Rule 1.6(a): Confidentiality
Signup and view all the flashcards
Attorney-Client Privilege
Attorney-Client Privilege
Signup and view all the flashcards
Privilege and Legal Advice
Privilege and Legal Advice
Signup and view all the flashcards
Expectation of Confidentiality
Expectation of Confidentiality
Signup and view all the flashcards
Privilege Waiver
Privilege Waiver
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federal Rule 502(d)
Federal Rule 502(d)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Crime-Fraud Exception
Crime-Fraud Exception
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule 502(g)(2): Work Product
Rule 502(g)(2): Work Product
Signup and view all the flashcards
Opinion Work Product
Opinion Work Product
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Rule 1.1: Competence
- Lawyers must provide competent representation to a client.
- Competent representation must include the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.
- Lawyers are not required to have prior experience in all fields of law but must reach the necessary competency.
- Competency is often evaluated using:
- Complexity and nature of the matter
- General experience
- Specialized training
- Ability to prepare and study adequately
- Feasibility of consulting or associating with another lawyer
- General practitioners can be competent for many legal issues, but expertise is required in some specialized areas. Lawyers can achieve competence through study or association with an experienced attorney.
- Emergencies may allow limited advice where referral is impractical, but caution is necessary.
- Lawyers must stay current with legal changes and technology through continued education to maintain competence.
- Thoroughness and Preparation: Inquiry, analysis, and use of professional methods are essential, and higher stakes require greater preparation.
- If working with non-firm attorneys, informed client consent is typically required, and competency must still be ensured.
Rule 5.4: Professional Independence of a Lawyer
- Lawyers cannot share legal fees with nonlawyers except under limited exceptions (such as retirement benefits or profit-sharing arrangements per Rule 5.4(a)(3)).
- Prohibits nonlawyers from influencing legal judgments, maintaining the independence of legal counsel.
- Under Rule 5.4(b), a lawyer may not form a partnership with a nonlawyer if any of the activities of the partnership consist of the practice of law.
- Nonlawyers are not bound by the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Attorney-Client Relationship
- The attorney-client relationship begins when a person reasonably believes they are consulting a lawyer for the purpose of obtaining legal advice or representation, and the lawyer:
- Expressly agrees to provide legal services, or
- Impliedly agrees through conduct (e.g., giving specific legal advice in response to a client’s issue).
- A signed contract can clarify the relationship, but it is not required for an attorney-client relationship to exist.
- Preliminary Consultations: If a potential client shares confidential information with an attorney during an initial consultation, the attorney may owe duties of confidentiality and conflict-checking, even if no representation follows.
- Even if an attorney does not formally agree, the relationship can be implied if the client reasonably relies on the attorney’s legal advice
- Case Example: Attorney-Client Relationship Formed
- A person consults a lawyer about a potential lawsuit. The lawyer provides specific legal advice about the claim’s viability. This establishes a relationship, even if no contract is signed.
- Case Example: No Attorney-Client Relationship Formed
- A lawyer meets an acquaintance at a social event who casually asks, “What do you think about my business dispute?” The lawyer responds generally, “That sounds complicated—you should talk to a lawyer.” No relationship is formed because the lawyer did not provide specific legal advice.
Termination of the Attorney-Client Relationship
- Ends when:
- The agreed-upon scope of representation is completed.
- The client fires the lawyer.
- The lawyer withdraws from representation
- A court intervenes
- Rule 1.2(c) permits a lawyer to "limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent."
- Clients have the right to terminate a lawyer at any time, with or without cause.
- Under Rule 1.16(a), a lawyer shall withdraw if:
- Representation would result in violating ethics rules.
- The lawyer’s physical/mental condition impairs their ability.
- The client insists on using the lawyer’s services for fraud/crime.
- Under Rule 1.16(b), a lawyer may withdraw if:
- Withdrawal can be done without materially harming the client.
- The client fails to fulfill obligations (e.g., unpaid fees after warning).
- The lawyer finds the representation repugnant or fundamentally disagrees with the client’s decisions.
- A court orders the lawyer to withdraw.
- In litigation, an attorney cannot unilaterally withdraw without court approval if representation has commenced.
- When the client dies (for personal matters) or dissolves (for corporations).
- Exception: If an estate or successor entity continues litigation, representation may extend.
- When a fixed time period expires (if agreed in the contract).
Unauthorized Practice of Law & Multijurisdictional Practice (Rule 5.5)
- A lawyer may not practice law in a jurisdiction where they are not admitted, nor assist others in doing so.
- However, temporary legal services may be allowed if (1) the lawyer associates with a local attorney who actively participates, (2) the services are related to a pending tribunal where the lawyer is or expects to be authorized, (3) the work is tied to arbitration or mediation arising from the lawyer’s admitted jurisdiction, or (4) the services relate to the lawyer’s existing practice in another jurisdiction.
- Temporary legal services exceptions may be allowed if (1) the lawyer associates with a local attorney who actively participates, (2) the services are related to a pending tribunal where the lawyer is or expects to be authorized, (3) the work is tied to an arbitration or mediation arising from the lawyer’s admitted jurisdiction, or (4) the services relate to the lawyer’s existing practice in another jurisdiction.
- Continuous in-house counsel services to an employer are allowed if pro hac vice admission is not required.
- Foreign lawyers must be in good standing and subject to professional regulation to qualify under these exceptions.
- Pro hac vice ("for this occasion") is a temporary admission allowing an out-of-state attorney to practice law in a specific case before a court without being licensed in that jurisdiction.
- Consists of the lawyer applying for pro hac vice admission, where a local, bar-admitted attorney (licensed in the state) must sponsor the out-of-state lawyer, with the court ultimately having discretion to approve or deny the application.
- Pro hac vice admission is case-specific—it does not authorize general legal practice in the state.
Rule 1.16: Declining or Terminating Representation
- Mandatory Withdrawal:
- Violation of rules of professional conduct or law.
- Lawyer’s physical or mental condition impairs ability.
- Lawyer is discharged.
- Client seeks to use lawyer’s services for crime or fraud.
- Permissive Withdrawal (“May” Withdraw):
- If withdrawal will not materially harm the client.
- Client persists in criminal or fraudulent behavior.
- Client has already used lawyer’s services for fraud.
- Client insists on repugnant or fundamentally disagreeable actions.
- Client fails to meet obligations to lawyer.
- Representation causes undue financial burden.
- Other good cause exists.
Rule 6.2: Accepting Appointments
- Lawyers should accept court appointments unless:
- Representation would violate professional rules.
- It would impose an unreasonable financial burden.
- The lawyer finds the client or cause repugnant.
Rule 7.3: Solicitation of Clients
- Solicitation is regulated to prevent undue influence and misleading advertising.
- A lawyer may not solicit professional employment by live person-to-person contact unless: (1) The contact is with another lawyer, (2) The contact is with a family member, close friend, or prior professional relationship, or (3) The lawyer is offering pro bono services without pecuniary gain.
- General advertising is permitted if it is truthful and not misleading.
- Written, recorded, and electronic communications must include “Advertising Material” unless exempted.
Rule 7.1: Communications Concerning a Lawyer’s Services
- Prohibits false or misleading communications about a lawyer’s services.
Rule 7.2: Advertising
- Governs truthful legal advertising, where Law firm names must be accurate.
- Rule 7.1 further indicates that “A firm may be designated by the names of all or some of its current members, by the names of deceased members where there has been a succession in the firm’s identity or by a trade name if it is not false or misleading.”
Rule 1.5: Fees
- Governs the reasonableness of fees.
- Specifies cases where contingency fees are prohibited.
- Details fee division among lawyers.
- The decision to increase the lodestar fee is not wholly at the judge’s discretion—a judge must make a determination of superior performance and results by identifying extraordinary circumstances to justify a fee enhancement.
- Contingency Fees:
- Must be reasonable and in writing.
- Not allowed in divorce cases, child custody cases, or criminal cases.
- General Fee Agreements:
- Written agreements are not always required, but are highly recommended.
- Measuring a Reasonable Attorney Fee:
- Consider the complexity of the case, jurisdiction, time and effort required.
- Reasonable number of hours × appropriate hourly rate = Lodestar method.
- Contingency Fees & Risk Premiums:
- Since contingency fees are riskier, attorneys may charge a higher percentage.
- Courts allow enhancements for exceptional performance, but they are rare and unusual (Perdue v. Kenny).
- Proper Categorization – The contract lawyers' work must be billed as legal services, not as a reimbursable expense. (rule on Law Firm Billing for Contract Lawyers' Work)
Rule 1.6: Confidentiality of Information
- A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless:
- The client gives informed consent.
- The disclosure is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation.
- One of the seven exceptions under Rule 1.6(b) applies:
- (1) To prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, (2) To prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud causing substantial injury, (3) To prevent, mitigate, or rectify a crime or fraud already committed, (4) To secure legal advice about compliance with the Rules, (5) To establish a claim or defense for the lawyer in a legal dispute, (6) To comply with law or a court order, or (7) To detect and resolve conflicts of interest (if disclosure does NOT prejudice the client).
- Attorney's Duty to Safeguard Confidentiality: Lawyers must take reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized disclosure (e.g., avoiding leaving files out in public settings).
Attorney-Client Privilege
- Criteria for Privilege (ALI Restatement §§68-86):
- A communication
- Between privileged persons
- In confidence
- For the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance
- Privilege applies in testimonial settings (e.g., court proceedings, depositions).
- State vs. Federal Law: Privilege follows state law in state courts and federal law in federal courts.
- Privilege is waived when voluntarily disclosed to a third party.
- The attorney-client privilege applies only when the dominant intent is seeking legal advice.
- Privilege protects communications, but not observations. Communications are not privileged if intended to be made public.
Rule 1.8: Conflicts of Interest and Business Transactions with Clients
- Outlines rules for equity interest as payment.
- Governs financial assistance to clients.
- Rule 1.8(a) allows attorneys to enter into business transactions with clients if:
- The terms are fair and reasonable.
- The client is advised to seek independent legal counsel.
- The client gives informed consent in writing.
- Rule 1.8(e) allows modest gifts (e.g., food, transportation) for indigent clients in pro bono cases. Includes rules for Safekeeping Property (Trust Accounts) and handling advance fees.
RULE 2.1
- Permits a lawyer, when giving advice to a client, to refer not only to law but to other considerations such as moral, economic, social and political factors.
Work-Product Doctrine
- Fact vs. Opinion Work Product
- Opinion Work Product: NEVER DISCOVERABLE. Consists of attorney’s mental impressions, legal theories, and litigation strategy.
- Fact Work Product: MAY BE DISCOVERABLE if the opposing party shows substantial need AND undue hardship in obtaining equivalent materials by other means.
- Criteria for the Work-Product Protection. Under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(g)(2):
- Consists of tangible or intangible material prepared in anticipation of litigation.
- Notes that are routinely made might not be made in anticipation of litigation, which is required for work-product protection to attach.
- Key Statutes include: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) & Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(2) & (b)(2).
- Waiver of the Work-Product Protection:
- Benefits both the lawyer and the client
- Occurs when:
- The client or lawyer voluntarily discloses the work product to a third party likely to share it with an adversary.
- A party fails to object to discovery in a tribunal proceeding
- Rule 1. states lawyer must not reveal information relating to representation unless the client consents or an exception applies. The exceptions found in are found in rule 1.6(b).
Rule 1.14: Clients with Diminished Capacity
- Governs lawyer’s duty in protecting clients with diminished capacity.
Rule 1.2: Scope of Representation & Allocation of Authority
- Specifies client control over settlement decisions.
Rule 5.1: Responsibilities of Supervising Lawyers
- Lawyers must ensure subordinates’ competence.
Rule 1.3: Diligence
- Prohibits abandoning work due to nonpayment.
Rule 1.8(h): Malpractice Liability
- Restricts on limiting malpractice liability.
- A lawyer who follows his or her client’s instructions about excluding evidence of adultery is not liable for malpractice.
- The attorney’s advice to the client concerned the consequences that were likely to result if the client violated the law, and this type of advice is authorized by Rule 1.2(d).
Rule 1.7: Conflicts of Interest
- Strickland v. Washington Test (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel)
- Is the Two-Prong Test: Deficient Performance & Prejudice
- Rule on Waiver of Attorney’s Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988
- Under Evans v. Jeff D., 475 U.S. 717 (1986), a defendant in a civil rights case may condition settlement on the waiver of attorney’s fees otherwise available under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, provided that: Voluntary Agreement & No Statutory Prohibition.
- Judicial Approval of Settlement – Courts will generally uphold settlements that include fee waivers unless there is evidence of coercion, fraud, or a violation of Rule 23(e) (if a class action is involved).
Ancillary Businesses
- Rule 5.7(b) defines law-related services as “services that might reasonably be performed in conjunction with and in substance are related to the provision of legal services, and that are not prohibited as unauthorized practice of law when provided by a nonlawyer,”
Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d)
- States that “[a] federal court may order that the privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding."
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel (Strickland v. Washington)
- A defendant must show two elements to establish ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) Unreasonable Conduct: The attorney’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms. (2) Prejudice: There is a reasonable probability that, but for the attorney’s errors, the outcome would have been different.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.