Law of Contract: Voidable Contracts
38 Questions
4 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

A threat of dismissal that is not expressed can still be considered as a form of coercion.

True

A contract entered into due to duress, undue influence, or misrepresentation is deemed void from the beginning.

False

The more reasonable the fear, the greater will be the reluctance of the court to accept that it actually induced the contract.

False

Duress involves the use of physical force to intimidate a party into entering a contract.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Silence is always indicative of free consent.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a contract is entered into under duress, the threatened party can set aside the contract and claim damages.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The threat must be directed at the life or bodily integrity of a person's immediate family.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

A threat to commit a lawful act can constitute duress.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases of duress, the moral pressure used must have caused damage.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

A threat is only considered imminent if it is actually carried out.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Coercion operates on the body of the victim by forcing them to choose between entering the contract or suffering harm.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Coercion of the will is a type of physical force.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Proof of protest at the time of payment or entry into the contract is always necessary to prove involuntary nature of the transaction.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The threat used in duress must be of an imminent or inevitable evil.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The onus of proving undue influence lies with the party who was exploited.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The remedy of restitutio in integrum is only available to the guilty party.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

If the innocent party chooses to rescind the contract, they are not bound by its terms.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The innocent party is not entitled to set aside the legal consequences of the contract.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Undue influence occurs when a person acts of their own free will.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The restitutio in integrum remedy is only available in cases where the contract is invalid.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The duty to restore performances arises only after the contract has been rescinded.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

A misrepresentation must be made with the intention of inducing the other party to contract but does not necessarily have to result in the contract being formed.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a party would have contracted irrespective of the misrepresentation, then rescission is possible.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

A causal misrepresentation is a type of misrepresentation that results in less advantageous terms for a party.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

A party may obtain rescission and restitution for an incidental misrepresentation.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Intentional misrepresentation is a type of misrepresentation that occurs when a party makes a statement that they believe to be true.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

There are only two types of misrepresentation: intentional and negligent.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The misrepresentation itself must have persuaded the party to enter into the contract for it to be considered a causal misrepresentation.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Intentional misrepresentation of a false fact made with the intention of persuading the other party to conclude the contract renders the contract voidable.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Negligent misrepresentation of a false fact made with the intention of persuading the other party to conclude the contract renders the contract void.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Innocent misrepresentation of a false fact made with the intention of persuading the other party to conclude the contract renders the contract void.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

A contract entered into due to misrepresentation is deemed void from the beginning.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Remedies for negligent misrepresentation include setting aside the contract, enforcing the contract, and claiming damages if loss is suffered.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Remedies for innocent misrepresentation include setting aside the contract and enforcing the contract, but not claiming damages.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Intentional misrepresentation is made with the intention of persuading the other party to conclude the contract, and is made recklessly or without honest belief in its truth.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Negligent misrepresentation is a type of misrepresentation made with the intention of persuading the other party to conclude the contract.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Innocent misrepresentation is a type of misrepresentation made with the intention of deceiving the other party to conclude the contract.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

A false fact made negligently or innocently can still be considered a misrepresentation.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Intentional Misrepresentation

  • Involves representation of a false fact made fraudulently.
  • Must be believed by the representee and induced them to contract.
  • Made knowingly, without honest belief in the truth, or recklessly.
  • Renders the contract void.

Negligent Misrepresentation

  • Representation of a false fact made negligently.
  • Belief by the representee must induce the contract.
  • Results in a voidable contract.
  • Remedies include setting aside the contract, enforcing the contract, or claiming damages for any loss suffered.

Innocent Misrepresentation

  • False fact represented innocently.
  • Believed by the representee and induced the contract.
  • Renders the contract voidable.
  • Remedies limited to setting aside or enforcing the contract; no damages claim available.

Coercion and Duress

  • Coercion pressures the victim's mind, forcing a choice between contracting or facing harm.
  • Reasonable fear: The threat must be significant and affect a reasonably steadfast person.
  • Paragon Business Forms case illustrates that an illogical or unreasonable fear is insufficient to induce a contract.
  • Threats must target life, bodily integrity, property, or immediate family.
  • Absence of protest during contract entry does not negate relief if evidence supports the contract's involuntary nature.

Elements of Duress

  • Actual or reasonable fear due to a threat of significant evil.
  • Threat must be imminent or inevitable.
  • Intention to induce the contract is crucial; misrepresentation must foreseeably persuade the other party.
  • Rescission is possible if the misrepresentation directly resulted in the contract formation.

Types of Misrepresentation

  • Causal Misrepresentation: Leads to the formation of a contract.
  • Incidental Misrepresentation: Results in less favorable terms without inducing the contract.

Duress Elements

  • Improper pressure and intimidation leading to a contract.
  • Consent obtained through illegitimate threats is voidable.
  • Elements include: actual violence or fear, threat of imminent evil, unlawful threats, and causing damage.

Undue Influence

  • Involves coercion of will without physical force.
  • Claims must prove that the influence was exploited to obtain agreement on detrimental terms.
  • Remedy of Restitutio in Integrum aims to restore parties to pre-contractual positions.

Restitutio in Integrum

  • Allows the innocent party to set aside the contract's legal effects.
  • If rescinded, notice must be communicated, terminating the contract upon receipt.
  • Both parties are obligated to return any performances made under the contract.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Description

Test your understanding of voidable contracts in the law of contract, including duress, undue influence, and misrepresentation. Learn about the conditions that make a contract voidable and how it differs from material mistakes. Explore the legal implications of improper contracts and how they can be deemed valid until set aside.

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser