Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the age of majority according to Section 2 of the Age of Majority Act 1971?
What is the age of majority according to Section 2 of the Age of Majority Act 1971?
- 16 and above
- 21 and above
- 18 and above (correct)
- 20 and above
In which case was the contract considered void because the plaintiff was a minor and transferred land to the defendant?
In which case was the contract considered void because the plaintiff was a minor and transferred land to the defendant?
- Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck
- Gov of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh
- Nash v Inman
- Tan Hee Juan v Teh Boon Keat (correct)
Which section of the Contracts Act 1950 states that contracts for necessaries are valid to be entered into by a minor?
Which section of the Contracts Act 1950 states that contracts for necessaries are valid to be entered into by a minor?
- Section 4(a)
- Section 69 (correct)
- Section 10
- Section 11
In which case was education considered a necessary and the defendant had to pay for damages?
In which case was education considered a necessary and the defendant had to pay for damages?
According to Section 30 of the Contracts Act 1950, what is the status of uncertain contracts?
According to Section 30 of the Contracts Act 1950, what is the status of uncertain contracts?
In the case of Tan Hee Juan v Teh Boon Keat, why was the contract considered void?
In the case of Tan Hee Juan v Teh Boon Keat, why was the contract considered void?
According to Section 4(a) of the Children and Young Persons (Amendment) Act 1976, what type of agreements are valid to be entered by minors?
According to Section 4(a) of the Children and Young Persons (Amendment) Act 1976, what type of agreements are valid to be entered by minors?
In the case of Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck, why was the pro forma not considered a legal contract?
In the case of Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck, why was the pro forma not considered a legal contract?
What was the outcome of the case Balfour v Balfour in relation to the familial agreement?
What was the outcome of the case Balfour v Balfour in relation to the familial agreement?
In Coward v Motor Insurers' Bureau, why was Mr. Coward not considered as 'for hire or reward'?
In Coward v Motor Insurers' Bureau, why was Mr. Coward not considered as 'for hire or reward'?
In the case of Nash v Inman, why were the 11 fancy waistcoats considered void?
In the case of Nash v Inman, why were the 11 fancy waistcoats considered void?
What is the status of a commercial agreement according to Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck?
What is the status of a commercial agreement according to Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck?
Why was the familial agreement in Balfour v Balfour not considered binding?
Why was the familial agreement in Balfour v Balfour not considered binding?
What type of agreements are valid to be entered by minors according to Section 4(a) of the Children and Young Persons (Amendment) Act 1976?
What type of agreements are valid to be entered by minors according to Section 4(a) of the Children and Young Persons (Amendment) Act 1976?
What is the age of majority according to Section 2 of the Age of Majority Act 1971?
What is the age of majority according to Section 2 of the Age of Majority Act 1971?
Flashcards
Age of Majority
Age of Majority
A person who is 18 years old or older is legally considered an adult.
Contract with a Minor
Contract with a Minor
A contract entered into by a minor (under 18) is voidable, meaning it can be cancelled by the minor or their guardian.
Contracts for Necessaries
Contracts for Necessaries
Contracts for essential items like food, clothing, and education that are necessary for a minor are legally valid.
Pro Forma Agreement
Pro Forma Agreement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Familial Agreement
Familial Agreement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intention to Create Legal Relations
Intention to Create Legal Relations
Signup and view all the flashcards
Uncertain Contract
Uncertain Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Void Contract
Void Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Children and Young Persons (Amendment) Act 1976
Children and Young Persons (Amendment) Act 1976
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contract for Hire or Reward
Contract for Hire or Reward
Signup and view all the flashcards
Age of Majority Act 1971
Age of Majority Act 1971
Signup and view all the flashcards
Tan Hee Juan v Teh Boon Keat
Tan Hee Juan v Teh Boon Keat
Signup and view all the flashcards
Gov of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh
Gov of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh
Signup and view all the flashcards
Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck
Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck
Signup and view all the flashcards
Balfour v Balfour
Balfour v Balfour
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- Introduction to The Law of Contract, Torts and Crimes at Universiti Teknologi MARA
- Studocu is not affiliated with the university
- Download by Muhammad Farhan Adla Mohd Fadzli (student ID: [email protected])
- Law of Contract
- Capacity: Section 10: free consent, competent parties
- Section 11: competent parties - age of majority, sound mind, not disqualified by law
- Age of Majority Act 1971: age of majority is 18 and above
- Tan Hee Juan v Teh Boon Keat: void contract due to plaintiff being a minor - transfer of land to defendant
- Section 69 of CA1950: minors can enter into contracts for necessaries, suppliers can be reimbursed
- Nash v Inman: contract for luxurious articles (11 fancy waistcoats) is void
- Gov of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh: education is considered a necessary, defendant had to pay RM2683 for damages
- Scholarship agreements: Section 4(a) of C(A)A1976 allows minors to enter
- Capacity: Section 12: unsound mind
- Intention to Create Legal Relations
- Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Matthew Liu Chin Teck: pro forma agreement for commercial deals does not create a legal obligation to purchase
- Balfour v Balfour: familial agreement not binding when done in amity due to lack of intention to create legal relations
- Merrit v Merrit: familial agreement binding when done when not in amity, evidence of separation and no longer cohabitating
- Coward v Motor Insurers' Bureau: social/domestic agreements not considered "for hire or reward," no intention to enter into a legal contract
- Certainty: Section 30 of CA1950: uncertain.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
