Law and Legal Systems: Key Concepts

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In a criminal trial, what standard of proof must the prosecution meet to secure a conviction?

  • Probable cause
  • Clear and convincing evidence
  • Beyond a reasonable doubt (correct)
  • Preponderance of the evidence

Which of the following best exemplifies overcriminalization?

  • Implementing mandatory minimum sentences for repeat offenders of serious crimes.
  • Increasing surveillance and data collection to prevent terrorist plots.
  • Classifying minor acts of civil disobedience, like jaywalking, as felonies. (correct)
  • Enacting stricter penalties for violent crimes such as armed robbery.

Amendments 4, 5, 6, and 8 of the Bill of Rights primarily serve to:

  • Define the structure and powers of the federal government.
  • Establish the rights of states in relation to the federal government.
  • Outline the process for amending the Constitution.
  • Safeguard individual rights against government actions. (correct)

A city ordinance prohibits 'excessively loud noises' after 10 PM. A local musician argues this law is unconstitutional because it doesn't clearly define 'excessively loud'. Which legal concept is the musician employing?

<p>Vague law (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Officer Gary Davis, where a drunk driver was acquitted of murder but convicted of misdemeanors after causing a fatal accident, which legal principle could be invoked to argue against the fairness of the outcome, assuming all evidence was legally obtained and presented?

<p>Burden of Proof (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which ethical framework is best represented by a corporation deciding to implement a new safety feature because it reduces the overall risk of accidents, even though it increases production costs?

<p>Outcome-Based Ethics (Utilitarianism) (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A company discovers a flaw in its product that could potentially cause harm to consumers. Instead of recalling the product, they decide to offer compensation only to those who are actually injured. Which case exemplifies this type of decision-making?

<p>Pinto case (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of pre-trial discovery, which method involves a recorded video of answers provided by a witness or party involved in the lawsuit?

<p>Deposition (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A business is accused of violating ethical standards. Applying Kant’s Categorical Imperative, what question would a duty-based ethicist primarily ask?

<p>What would happen if everyone acted in the same way as we intend to? (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Following a trial, the losing party believes the jury's verdict was unreasonable given the evidence presented. What post-trial motion might they file?

<p>Judgement notwithstanding the verdict (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A state law requires all alcoholic beverages sold within the state to be produced locally. Based on the Granholm v. Heald ruling, is this law likely to be constitutional?

<p>No, laws discriminating against out-of-state businesses impede interstate commerce. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which action is the best example of a company fulfilling its Corporate Social Responsibility?

<p>Donating a portion of profits to environmental conservation. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a legal dispute, if the defendant does not respond to the complaint and summons within the specified time, what is the likely outcome?

<p>A default judgment will be entered in the plaintiff's favor. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the role of an arbitrator in Alternate Dispute Resolution?

<p>Imposing a binding decision that both parties must follow. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the Stella v. McDonald's case, what was the primary reason the jury awarded punitive damages to Stella Liebeck?

<p>McDonald's coffee was served at an unusually high temperature, posing a known risk. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the concept of federalism in the United States?

<p>A system in which power is divided between a federal government and state governments. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of U.S. constitutional law, what is the significance of 'enumerated powers'?

<p>They specify the powers granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the key difference between an 'action in law' and an 'action in equity'?

<p>An action in law seeks monetary damages, while an action in equity seeks immediate relief from the court. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the concept of stare decisis influence judicial decision-making?

<p>It directs courts to generally follow precedents set by higher courts in similar cases. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which level of scrutiny is typically applied to regulations on corporate/commercial speech?

<p>Intermediate scrutiny, requiring a substantial government interest. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Commerce Clause grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce. What limit is placed on state authority by the Dormant Commerce Clause?

<p>States cannot pass laws that substantially affect interstate commerce, even if Congress has not acted in that area. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Granholm v. Heald, involving Michigan wineries, what was the central legal issue?

<p>Whether states could prohibit direct shipment of wine from out-of-state wineries. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Considering the rulings in Heart of Atlanta Motel and United States v. Lopez, which statement best reflects the Supreme Court's view on Congress's power under the Commerce Clause?

<p>Congress can regulate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, but not purely local activities. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a negligence case, what does Res Ipsa Loquitur suggest?

<p>The facts of the accident inherently imply negligence, reducing the need for additional proof. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What key element was central to the court's decision in the 'flour barrel' case?

<p>The unexplained nature of the barrel falling from the warehouse window. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the 'Jenny Jones' case, what was the primary basis for holding the producers partially responsible?

<p>The producers failed to adequately assess and manage the risks of the show's content. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What legal principle is typically at the forefront of a 'pothole case'?

<p>Negligence, focusing on the failure to maintain safe road conditions. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What duty does a government or property owner owe in premises liability cases, such as the 'pothole case'?

<p>To keep their property reasonably safe for others. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of establishing negligence, what purpose does the 'reasonable person standard' serve?

<p>To measure someone's actions against what a person of ordinary prudence would do in similar circumstances. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does Res Ipsa Loquitur affect the typical burden of proof in a negligence case?

<p>It shifts the burden to the defendant to prove they were NOT negligent. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A pedestrian is injured when a piano falls from a third-story window. Which legal principle is MOST applicable in determining liability?

<p><em>Res Ipsa Loquitur</em> (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A local government knows about a dangerous sinkhole on a public street but fails to put up warning signs or repair it. A driver crashes their car into the sinkhole and is injured. What is the MOST likely basis for the driver's claim against the local government?

<p>Negligence (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A surgeon leaves a sponge inside a patient during surgery. Which legal doctrine would MOST likely apply when determining the surgeon’s negligence?

<p><em>Res Ipsa Loquitur</em> (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following scenarios best exemplifies the 'Reasonable Person Standard' in tort law?

<p>An average person, under normal circumstances, fails to notice a wet floor in a grocery store and slips. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a negligence case, what is the significance of establishing a 'duty of care'?

<p>It establishes that the defendant had a legal obligation to act responsibly towards the plaintiff. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a civil trial, what does 'burden of proof by a preponderance' mean for the plaintiff?

<p>The plaintiff must present evidence that is slightly more convincing than the defendant's evidence. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which scenario exemplifies the tort of battery?

<p>Intentionally tripping someone, causing them to fall and break their arm. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does libel differ from slander in the context of defamation?

<p>Libel is written defamation, while slander is spoken defamation. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a negligence case, what is the 'but for' test used to determine?

<p>Whether the harm to the plaintiff would have occurred regardless of the defendant's actions. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the defense of 'assumption of risk' operate in a negligence claim?

<p>It demonstrates that the plaintiff voluntarily accepted a known risk of harm. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A store owner is protected from liability due to an 'open and obvious' hazard on their property. Which scenario best fits this legal principle?

<p>A customer falls after ignoring clearly marked 'wet floor' signs around a spill. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a jurisdiction that follows 'contributory negligence', what happens if the plaintiff is found to be even slightly responsible for their own injuries?

<p>The plaintiff is barred from recovering any damages. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the legal doctrine of 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' generally imply?

<p>The facts suggest negligence occurred even without direct evidence of how it happened. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Ideology

Values guiding actions based on social expectations.

Federalism

Power divided between federal and state governments.

Substantive Law

The actual laws themselves.

Procedural Law

Procedures to be followed for laws.

Signup and view all the flashcards

State Police Powers

States' broad authority to regulate conduct.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Stare Decisis/Precedent

Courts follow precedents in similar cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bill of Rights

Protects from government, not private, actions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Commerce Clause

Congress regulates interstate business activity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The standard of proof in a criminal case; no other logical explanation exists besides the defendant committing the crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Overcriminalization

When too many actions are made illegal, even if harmless, leading to excessive punishment for minor things.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bill of Rights Safeguards

Safeguards for individual rights against government action, found in Amendments 4, 5, 6, and 8.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Miranda Rule

Constitutional rights police must read to a suspect before questioning them.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exclusionary Rule

Evidence improperly gathered cannot be used in a criminal trial.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Granholm's Ruling

States cannot discriminate against out-of-state businesses, especially in alcohol sales, as it interferes with interstate commerce.

Signup and view all the flashcards

William K. Frankena

Argues for a positive social morality.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Gandhi's Sin

Commerce without morality.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Corporate Social Responsibility

Acting ethically and being accountable to society.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Kant's Categorical Imperative

Act as if every action could become a universal law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Utilitarianism

The greatest good for the greatest number of people.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Weighing the cost of an action against its benefits.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Court Systems

Trial Courts, Appellate Courts, and Supreme Courts.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Complaint and Summons

Document presented to the court which starts the lawsuit and informs of the cause of action.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deposition (Discovery)

Testimony recorded.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Res Ipsa Loquitur

A legal principle where the circumstances of an accident imply negligence without needing additional proof.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Mr. Bryne

The man who was injured by the falling flour barrel in the Res Ipsa Loquitur case.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Mr. Boadle

The warehouse owner in the flour barrel case who was sued for negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Jenny Jones Show Incident

A talk show where a guest revealed a crush, leading to a tragic outcome.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Scott Amedure

Revealed his crush on the Jenny Jones show that resulted in tragedy.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Jonathan Schmitz

Shot and killed scott Amedure after appearing on the Jenny Jones show

Signup and view all the flashcards

Premises Liability

Legal responsibility of property owners to maintain safe conditions on their property.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Pothole Case

A common example of premises liability, where someone is injured due to a road defect.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonable Person Standard

Standard used to assess if someone acted with reasonable care and wasn't negligent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Preponderance of Evidence

Proving something is more likely true than not; used in civil trials.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intentional Tort

A deliberate action taken to cause harm to someone else.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Assault and Battery

Threatening someone with harm (assault) and physically harming them (battery).

Signup and view all the flashcards

False Imprisonment

Holding someone without their consent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Defamation

Damaging someone's reputation through false statements.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Slander

Spoken defamation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Libel

Written defamation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Negligence

Failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

"But For" Test

The injury would not have occurred if not for the defendant's actions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Values that people hold that guide how they act in response to social expectations are known as ideology.
  • Federalism is a system where power is divided between the federal and state government
  • The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government certain enumerated powers.
  • A law deemed unconstitutional becomes void.
  • An action in Law is a lawsuit, enabling someone to sue for money.
  • An action in Equity involves seeking immediate relief from the court.
  • The actual law itself is known as Substantive Law
  • Procedural Law defines the procedures that must be followed for laws.
  • State Police Powers allow states greater latitude in regulating individual conduct.
  • Stare Decisis/Precedent means "Let the decision stand," such that courts generally follow lower court decisions in similar cases that set a precedent.
  • The Bill of Rights applies to government action, not private conduct, and the first 10 amendments to the constitution protect from potential governmental overreach.
  • Individual political speech receives the highest protection, followed by corporate/commercial speech, which has considerable protection but can be regulated if a substantial government interest directly advances its objective.
  • The Commerce Clause grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce.

Dormant Commerce Clause & Michigan Winery's

  • The Dormant Commerce Clause restricts state authority from passing laws that substantially affect interstate commerce.
  • Michigan Winery's case: SCOTUS ruled Michigan's statute against other wines unconstitutional because Michigan tried to unfairly block certain wines

Cases

  • Dearborn Bakery: Received immediate relief from the court due to a religious baking season after a new baker across the street defamed its name.
  • Heart of Atlanta Motel: SCOTUS ruled that the motel must rent to blacks after Congress used the commerce clause as justification, following the denial of black patrons' rights to stay at the hotel.
  • U.S. v Lopez; Granholm v Heald: Compared, Lopez limited federal power, preventing Congress from using the commerce clause to regulate local activities, whereas Granholm restricted state power, preventing states from discriminating against out of state business

Ethics in Business

  • William K. Frankena argues in favor of a positive social morality.
  • Gandhi's Seven Deadly Sins includes commerce without morality.
  • Corporate Social Responsibility involves acting ethically and with accountability to society.
  • Duty Based Ethics: Kant's Categorical Imperative is to consider the result if everyone acted as you intended.
  • Outcome Based Ethics (Utilitarianism): Cost-Benefit Analysis; which advocates for aiming for the greatest good for the greatest number of people, and considering the consequences of an action.

Pinto & Toyota cases

  • Pinto: Ford ended up paying out even up paying out anyway to save their name, in this example of Cost – Benefit analysis where the value of human life is weighted against the cost of improving ford gas tanks
  • Toyota: Toyota paid out anyway to save their name, even though claims that the gas pedal gets stuck it was proven not to

Courts and Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR)

  • State and Federal Court Systems include Trial Courts, Appellate Courts, and Supreme Courts.
  • Complaint and Summons, followed by an Answer, means you must answer a complaint in a certain period and if you don't, a judgement will be entered in plaintiff's favor
  • Pre – trial Discovery (Deposition and Interrogatories): Includes Deposition (Discovery), which involves someone recording a video of answers, and Interrogatories (Discovery), which involve written questions and answers under oath.
  • Mediation within the trial involves three lawyers advising the judge; a Trial occurs if it is not settled.
  • Post – Trial Motions include Judgement NOT withstanding the verdict.
  • Most Lawsuits are dismissed or settled before trial

Alternate Dispute Resolution & Arbitration

  • Alternate Dispute Resolution is the difference between mediation and arbitration before a lawsuit is filed.
  • An Arbitrator is one who settles controversy between two sides; verdict must be followed.
  • Stella v. McDonalds, where a 79-year-old woman suffered third-degree burns and later awarded $2.86 million in punitive damages (reduced to $480,000), sparked debate over frivolous lawsuits and corporate responsibility.

Torts

  • The Reasonable Person Standard is the law's version of an average person
  • Objective View – Perspective is based upon valid viewpoints on a topic free from personal judgement or opinions
  • Elements: Duty, Breach, Harm because of breach are the core components of a negligence claim.
  • Burden of proof by a Preponderance: Legal standard means proving something is more likely true than not, and is the standard used in civil trials.
  • Intentional Torts include deliberate acts intended to cause individual harm.
  • Assault and Battery (Immediate harm): Assault is a threat or attempt to injure, whereas Battery is an unconsented offensive touching
  • Defamation is the act of harming or ruining another's reputation.

Slander, Libel & Negligence

  • Slander: Spoken, Libel: Written.
  • Truth is a defense.
  • Negligence means you are responsible for any foreseeable harm
  • Proximal Cause: a legal concept of causation that asks whether the injury or other event would have occurred if the negligent act had not occurred.
  • (Person has a) Duty of care; (that person) Breached of that Duty; because of the breach (but for test) the party would not have been harmed.
  • (if) plaintiff is at all responsible, even just a bit, the plaintiff gets nothing via Contributory Negligence

Defenses

  • Assumption of Risk: Defense in which the defendant shows that the plaintiff knew of the risk involved in an activity and still took the chance of being injured
  • Comparative Negligence: which compare the acts of the parties
  • Open and Obvious: legal principle that protected business owners from liability caused by obvious hazard on their property
  • Res Ipsa Loquitor ( “the thing speaks for itself”) – the facts or evidence are so clear that they don't need further explanation and can be used to support that the circumstances or actions themselves clearly show that someone was negligent or responsible for harm

Cases

  • Bricklayer: case demonstrating negligence. A barrel of flour fell from a warehouse window and injured a man, and the court applied Res Ipsa Loquitor
  • Jenny Jones: a tragic event where a man killed another after being revealed to have a crush on him on the show, which then led to the family of the deceased to sue the show

Potholes & Tort Law

  • Pothole Case typically refers to someone who gets injured by a pothole, where they then sue the government for negligence under premises liability.
  • Reasonable Person Standard is used to determine if someone's actions were careless or negligent.
  • Burden of Proof, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is the standard that must be met by the prosecutions evidence in a criminal case.
  • Overcriminalization is when too many actions or behaviors are made illegal, even if they don't really harm anyone.
  • Misdemeanor punishment is up to a year in jail.
  • Felony punishment is over a year in prison.
  • The Bill of Rights safeguards individual rights against government action (Amendments 4,5,6, and 8).

Tim Boomer Case, Miranda Rule & Exclusionary Rule

  • Tim Boomer Case demonstrates the difference between vague and overboard laws, where the case highlights the limitations of each when applying to a case
  • Miranda Rule: the constitutional rights which police must read to a suspect before questioning can occur.
  • Exclusionary Rule: improperly gathered evidence may not be introduced in a criminal trial.
  • Officer Gary Davis and the speeding: Police Officer Gary Davis was fatally hit by a drunk driver while transporting a drunk suspect, which then led to the drunk driver to be acquitted of murder and convicted of two misdemeanors

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Law 293 Exam 1 Review PDF

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser