Podcast
Questions and Answers
In a criminal trial, what standard of proof must the prosecution meet to secure a conviction?
In a criminal trial, what standard of proof must the prosecution meet to secure a conviction?
- Probable cause
- Clear and convincing evidence
- Beyond a reasonable doubt (correct)
- Preponderance of the evidence
Which of the following best exemplifies overcriminalization?
Which of the following best exemplifies overcriminalization?
- Implementing mandatory minimum sentences for repeat offenders of serious crimes.
- Increasing surveillance and data collection to prevent terrorist plots.
- Classifying minor acts of civil disobedience, like jaywalking, as felonies. (correct)
- Enacting stricter penalties for violent crimes such as armed robbery.
Amendments 4, 5, 6, and 8 of the Bill of Rights primarily serve to:
Amendments 4, 5, 6, and 8 of the Bill of Rights primarily serve to:
- Define the structure and powers of the federal government.
- Establish the rights of states in relation to the federal government.
- Outline the process for amending the Constitution.
- Safeguard individual rights against government actions. (correct)
A city ordinance prohibits 'excessively loud noises' after 10 PM. A local musician argues this law is unconstitutional because it doesn't clearly define 'excessively loud'. Which legal concept is the musician employing?
A city ordinance prohibits 'excessively loud noises' after 10 PM. A local musician argues this law is unconstitutional because it doesn't clearly define 'excessively loud'. Which legal concept is the musician employing?
In the case of Officer Gary Davis, where a drunk driver was acquitted of murder but convicted of misdemeanors after causing a fatal accident, which legal principle could be invoked to argue against the fairness of the outcome, assuming all evidence was legally obtained and presented?
In the case of Officer Gary Davis, where a drunk driver was acquitted of murder but convicted of misdemeanors after causing a fatal accident, which legal principle could be invoked to argue against the fairness of the outcome, assuming all evidence was legally obtained and presented?
Which ethical framework is best represented by a corporation deciding to implement a new safety feature because it reduces the overall risk of accidents, even though it increases production costs?
Which ethical framework is best represented by a corporation deciding to implement a new safety feature because it reduces the overall risk of accidents, even though it increases production costs?
A company discovers a flaw in its product that could potentially cause harm to consumers. Instead of recalling the product, they decide to offer compensation only to those who are actually injured. Which case exemplifies this type of decision-making?
A company discovers a flaw in its product that could potentially cause harm to consumers. Instead of recalling the product, they decide to offer compensation only to those who are actually injured. Which case exemplifies this type of decision-making?
In the context of pre-trial discovery, which method involves a recorded video of answers provided by a witness or party involved in the lawsuit?
In the context of pre-trial discovery, which method involves a recorded video of answers provided by a witness or party involved in the lawsuit?
A business is accused of violating ethical standards. Applying Kant’s Categorical Imperative, what question would a duty-based ethicist primarily ask?
A business is accused of violating ethical standards. Applying Kant’s Categorical Imperative, what question would a duty-based ethicist primarily ask?
Following a trial, the losing party believes the jury's verdict was unreasonable given the evidence presented. What post-trial motion might they file?
Following a trial, the losing party believes the jury's verdict was unreasonable given the evidence presented. What post-trial motion might they file?
A state law requires all alcoholic beverages sold within the state to be produced locally. Based on the Granholm v. Heald ruling, is this law likely to be constitutional?
A state law requires all alcoholic beverages sold within the state to be produced locally. Based on the Granholm v. Heald ruling, is this law likely to be constitutional?
Which action is the best example of a company fulfilling its Corporate Social Responsibility?
Which action is the best example of a company fulfilling its Corporate Social Responsibility?
In a legal dispute, if the defendant does not respond to the complaint and summons within the specified time, what is the likely outcome?
In a legal dispute, if the defendant does not respond to the complaint and summons within the specified time, what is the likely outcome?
Which of the following best describes the role of an arbitrator in Alternate Dispute Resolution?
Which of the following best describes the role of an arbitrator in Alternate Dispute Resolution?
In the Stella v. McDonald's case, what was the primary reason the jury awarded punitive damages to Stella Liebeck?
In the Stella v. McDonald's case, what was the primary reason the jury awarded punitive damages to Stella Liebeck?
Which of the following best describes the concept of federalism in the United States?
Which of the following best describes the concept of federalism in the United States?
In the context of U.S. constitutional law, what is the significance of 'enumerated powers'?
In the context of U.S. constitutional law, what is the significance of 'enumerated powers'?
What is the key difference between an 'action in law' and an 'action in equity'?
What is the key difference between an 'action in law' and an 'action in equity'?
How does the concept of stare decisis influence judicial decision-making?
How does the concept of stare decisis influence judicial decision-making?
Which level of scrutiny is typically applied to regulations on corporate/commercial speech?
Which level of scrutiny is typically applied to regulations on corporate/commercial speech?
The Commerce Clause grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce. What limit is placed on state authority by the Dormant Commerce Clause?
The Commerce Clause grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce. What limit is placed on state authority by the Dormant Commerce Clause?
In Granholm v. Heald, involving Michigan wineries, what was the central legal issue?
In Granholm v. Heald, involving Michigan wineries, what was the central legal issue?
Considering the rulings in Heart of Atlanta Motel and United States v. Lopez, which statement best reflects the Supreme Court's view on Congress's power under the Commerce Clause?
Considering the rulings in Heart of Atlanta Motel and United States v. Lopez, which statement best reflects the Supreme Court's view on Congress's power under the Commerce Clause?
In a negligence case, what does Res Ipsa Loquitur suggest?
In a negligence case, what does Res Ipsa Loquitur suggest?
What key element was central to the court's decision in the 'flour barrel' case?
What key element was central to the court's decision in the 'flour barrel' case?
In the 'Jenny Jones' case, what was the primary basis for holding the producers partially responsible?
In the 'Jenny Jones' case, what was the primary basis for holding the producers partially responsible?
What legal principle is typically at the forefront of a 'pothole case'?
What legal principle is typically at the forefront of a 'pothole case'?
What duty does a government or property owner owe in premises liability cases, such as the 'pothole case'?
What duty does a government or property owner owe in premises liability cases, such as the 'pothole case'?
In the context of establishing negligence, what purpose does the 'reasonable person standard' serve?
In the context of establishing negligence, what purpose does the 'reasonable person standard' serve?
How does Res Ipsa Loquitur affect the typical burden of proof in a negligence case?
How does Res Ipsa Loquitur affect the typical burden of proof in a negligence case?
A pedestrian is injured when a piano falls from a third-story window. Which legal principle is MOST applicable in determining liability?
A pedestrian is injured when a piano falls from a third-story window. Which legal principle is MOST applicable in determining liability?
A local government knows about a dangerous sinkhole on a public street but fails to put up warning signs or repair it. A driver crashes their car into the sinkhole and is injured. What is the MOST likely basis for the driver's claim against the local government?
A local government knows about a dangerous sinkhole on a public street but fails to put up warning signs or repair it. A driver crashes their car into the sinkhole and is injured. What is the MOST likely basis for the driver's claim against the local government?
A surgeon leaves a sponge inside a patient during surgery. Which legal doctrine would MOST likely apply when determining the surgeon’s negligence?
A surgeon leaves a sponge inside a patient during surgery. Which legal doctrine would MOST likely apply when determining the surgeon’s negligence?
Which of the following scenarios best exemplifies the 'Reasonable Person Standard' in tort law?
Which of the following scenarios best exemplifies the 'Reasonable Person Standard' in tort law?
In a negligence case, what is the significance of establishing a 'duty of care'?
In a negligence case, what is the significance of establishing a 'duty of care'?
In a civil trial, what does 'burden of proof by a preponderance' mean for the plaintiff?
In a civil trial, what does 'burden of proof by a preponderance' mean for the plaintiff?
Which scenario exemplifies the tort of battery?
Which scenario exemplifies the tort of battery?
How does libel differ from slander in the context of defamation?
How does libel differ from slander in the context of defamation?
In a negligence case, what is the 'but for' test used to determine?
In a negligence case, what is the 'but for' test used to determine?
How does the defense of 'assumption of risk' operate in a negligence claim?
How does the defense of 'assumption of risk' operate in a negligence claim?
A store owner is protected from liability due to an 'open and obvious' hazard on their property. Which scenario best fits this legal principle?
A store owner is protected from liability due to an 'open and obvious' hazard on their property. Which scenario best fits this legal principle?
In a jurisdiction that follows 'contributory negligence', what happens if the plaintiff is found to be even slightly responsible for their own injuries?
In a jurisdiction that follows 'contributory negligence', what happens if the plaintiff is found to be even slightly responsible for their own injuries?
What does the legal doctrine of 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' generally imply?
What does the legal doctrine of 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' generally imply?
Flashcards
Ideology
Ideology
Values guiding actions based on social expectations.
Federalism
Federalism
Power divided between federal and state governments.
Substantive Law
Substantive Law
The actual laws themselves.
Procedural Law
Procedural Law
Signup and view all the flashcards
State Police Powers
State Police Powers
Signup and view all the flashcards
Stare Decisis/Precedent
Stare Decisis/Precedent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights
Signup and view all the flashcards
Commerce Clause
Commerce Clause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
Signup and view all the flashcards
Overcriminalization
Overcriminalization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Bill of Rights Safeguards
Bill of Rights Safeguards
Signup and view all the flashcards
Miranda Rule
Miranda Rule
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exclusionary Rule
Exclusionary Rule
Signup and view all the flashcards
Granholm's Ruling
Granholm's Ruling
Signup and view all the flashcards
William K. Frankena
William K. Frankena
Signup and view all the flashcards
Gandhi's Sin
Gandhi's Sin
Signup and view all the flashcards
Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility
Signup and view all the flashcards
Kant's Categorical Imperative
Kant's Categorical Imperative
Signup and view all the flashcards
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Signup and view all the flashcards
Court Systems
Court Systems
Signup and view all the flashcards
Complaint and Summons
Complaint and Summons
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deposition (Discovery)
Deposition (Discovery)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mr. Bryne
Mr. Bryne
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mr. Boadle
Mr. Boadle
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jenny Jones Show Incident
Jenny Jones Show Incident
Signup and view all the flashcards
Scott Amedure
Scott Amedure
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jonathan Schmitz
Jonathan Schmitz
Signup and view all the flashcards
Premises Liability
Premises Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pothole Case
Pothole Case
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reasonable Person Standard
Reasonable Person Standard
Signup and view all the flashcards
Preponderance of Evidence
Preponderance of Evidence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intentional Tort
Intentional Tort
Signup and view all the flashcards
Assault and Battery
Assault and Battery
Signup and view all the flashcards
False Imprisonment
False Imprisonment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defamation
Defamation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Slander
Slander
Signup and view all the flashcards
Libel
Libel
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negligence
Negligence
Signup and view all the flashcards
"But For" Test
"But For" Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- Values that people hold that guide how they act in response to social expectations are known as ideology.
- Federalism is a system where power is divided between the federal and state government
- The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government certain enumerated powers.
- A law deemed unconstitutional becomes void.
- An action in Law is a lawsuit, enabling someone to sue for money.
- An action in Equity involves seeking immediate relief from the court.
- The actual law itself is known as Substantive Law
- Procedural Law defines the procedures that must be followed for laws.
- State Police Powers allow states greater latitude in regulating individual conduct.
- Stare Decisis/Precedent means "Let the decision stand," such that courts generally follow lower court decisions in similar cases that set a precedent.
- The Bill of Rights applies to government action, not private conduct, and the first 10 amendments to the constitution protect from potential governmental overreach.
- Individual political speech receives the highest protection, followed by corporate/commercial speech, which has considerable protection but can be regulated if a substantial government interest directly advances its objective.
- The Commerce Clause grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce.
Dormant Commerce Clause & Michigan Winery's
- The Dormant Commerce Clause restricts state authority from passing laws that substantially affect interstate commerce.
- Michigan Winery's case: SCOTUS ruled Michigan's statute against other wines unconstitutional because Michigan tried to unfairly block certain wines
Cases
- Dearborn Bakery: Received immediate relief from the court due to a religious baking season after a new baker across the street defamed its name.
- Heart of Atlanta Motel: SCOTUS ruled that the motel must rent to blacks after Congress used the commerce clause as justification, following the denial of black patrons' rights to stay at the hotel.
- U.S. v Lopez; Granholm v Heald: Compared, Lopez limited federal power, preventing Congress from using the commerce clause to regulate local activities, whereas Granholm restricted state power, preventing states from discriminating against out of state business
Ethics in Business
- William K. Frankena argues in favor of a positive social morality.
- Gandhi's Seven Deadly Sins includes commerce without morality.
- Corporate Social Responsibility involves acting ethically and with accountability to society.
- Duty Based Ethics: Kant's Categorical Imperative is to consider the result if everyone acted as you intended.
- Outcome Based Ethics (Utilitarianism): Cost-Benefit Analysis; which advocates for aiming for the greatest good for the greatest number of people, and considering the consequences of an action.
Pinto & Toyota cases
- Pinto: Ford ended up paying out even up paying out anyway to save their name, in this example of Cost – Benefit analysis where the value of human life is weighted against the cost of improving ford gas tanks
- Toyota: Toyota paid out anyway to save their name, even though claims that the gas pedal gets stuck it was proven not to
Courts and Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- State and Federal Court Systems include Trial Courts, Appellate Courts, and Supreme Courts.
- Complaint and Summons, followed by an Answer, means you must answer a complaint in a certain period and if you don't, a judgement will be entered in plaintiff's favor
- Pre – trial Discovery (Deposition and Interrogatories): Includes Deposition (Discovery), which involves someone recording a video of answers, and Interrogatories (Discovery), which involve written questions and answers under oath.
- Mediation within the trial involves three lawyers advising the judge; a Trial occurs if it is not settled.
- Post – Trial Motions include Judgement NOT withstanding the verdict.
- Most Lawsuits are dismissed or settled before trial
Alternate Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
- Alternate Dispute Resolution is the difference between mediation and arbitration before a lawsuit is filed.
- An Arbitrator is one who settles controversy between two sides; verdict must be followed.
- Stella v. McDonalds, where a 79-year-old woman suffered third-degree burns and later awarded $2.86 million in punitive damages (reduced to $480,000), sparked debate over frivolous lawsuits and corporate responsibility.
Torts
- The Reasonable Person Standard is the law's version of an average person
- Objective View – Perspective is based upon valid viewpoints on a topic free from personal judgement or opinions
- Elements: Duty, Breach, Harm because of breach are the core components of a negligence claim.
- Burden of proof by a Preponderance: Legal standard means proving something is more likely true than not, and is the standard used in civil trials.
- Intentional Torts include deliberate acts intended to cause individual harm.
- Assault and Battery (Immediate harm): Assault is a threat or attempt to injure, whereas Battery is an unconsented offensive touching
- Defamation is the act of harming or ruining another's reputation.
Slander, Libel & Negligence
- Slander: Spoken, Libel: Written.
- Truth is a defense.
- Negligence means you are responsible for any foreseeable harm
- Proximal Cause: a legal concept of causation that asks whether the injury or other event would have occurred if the negligent act had not occurred.
- (Person has a) Duty of care; (that person) Breached of that Duty; because of the breach (but for test) the party would not have been harmed.
- (if) plaintiff is at all responsible, even just a bit, the plaintiff gets nothing via Contributory Negligence
Defenses
- Assumption of Risk: Defense in which the defendant shows that the plaintiff knew of the risk involved in an activity and still took the chance of being injured
- Comparative Negligence: which compare the acts of the parties
- Open and Obvious: legal principle that protected business owners from liability caused by obvious hazard on their property
- Res Ipsa Loquitor ( “the thing speaks for itself”) – the facts or evidence are so clear that they don't need further explanation and can be used to support that the circumstances or actions themselves clearly show that someone was negligent or responsible for harm
Cases
- Bricklayer: case demonstrating negligence. A barrel of flour fell from a warehouse window and injured a man, and the court applied Res Ipsa Loquitor
- Jenny Jones: a tragic event where a man killed another after being revealed to have a crush on him on the show, which then led to the family of the deceased to sue the show
Potholes & Tort Law
- Pothole Case typically refers to someone who gets injured by a pothole, where they then sue the government for negligence under premises liability.
- Reasonable Person Standard is used to determine if someone's actions were careless or negligent.
- Burden of Proof, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is the standard that must be met by the prosecutions evidence in a criminal case.
- Overcriminalization is when too many actions or behaviors are made illegal, even if they don't really harm anyone.
- Misdemeanor punishment is up to a year in jail.
- Felony punishment is over a year in prison.
- The Bill of Rights safeguards individual rights against government action (Amendments 4,5,6, and 8).
Tim Boomer Case, Miranda Rule & Exclusionary Rule
- Tim Boomer Case demonstrates the difference between vague and overboard laws, where the case highlights the limitations of each when applying to a case
- Miranda Rule: the constitutional rights which police must read to a suspect before questioning can occur.
- Exclusionary Rule: improperly gathered evidence may not be introduced in a criminal trial.
- Officer Gary Davis and the speeding: Police Officer Gary Davis was fatally hit by a drunk driver while transporting a drunk suspect, which then led to the drunk driver to be acquitted of murder and convicted of two misdemeanors
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.