Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

In which case did the Supreme Court establish that a police officer may perform a limited search for weapons on a person they reasonably suspect is armed and dangerous, even without probable cause for arrest?

  • United States v. Drayton
  • Terry v. Ohio (correct)
  • Maryland v. Wilson
  • New York v. Quarles

What legal doctrine, stemming from Nix v. Williams, allows illegally obtained evidence to be admitted in court if it inevitably would have been discovered through legal means?

  • Exclusionary Rule
  • Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine
  • Good Faith Exception
  • Inevitable Discovery Doctrine (correct)

In New York v. Quarles, what exception to the Miranda rule was established?

  • Exigent Circumstances Exception
  • Inevitable Discovery Exception
  • Good Faith Exception
  • Public Safety Exception (correct)

Maryland v. Wilson expanded the scope of police authority during traffic stops. What specific action did the court deem permissible?

<p>Ordering passengers to exit the vehicle. (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Which case significantly curtailed preventative detention, ruling that it was permissible only for defendants posing a flight risk or danger to the community?

<p>United States v. Salerno (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) established procedural safeguards for parole revocation hearings. Which of the following rights was NOT mandated by this case?

<p>The right to appointed counsel, regardless of ability to pay. (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

What right was extended to probation revocation hearings as a result of Mempa v. Rhay?

<p>The right to counsel. (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Gagnon v. Scarpelli addressed a question left unanswered by Morrissey v. Brewer and Mempa v. Rhay. What specific issue did Gagnon v. Scarpelli resolve?

<p>Whether probationers, like parolees, are entitled to due process rights in revocation proceedings. (D)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark case concerning the rights of indigent defendants. What specific right did the Supreme Court establish in this case?

<p>The right to appointed counsel in all felony cases. (D)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

In what way did Furman v. Georgia (1972) impact the application of the death penalty in the United States?

<p>It effectively suspended the death penalty due to its arbitrary and discriminatory application. (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Weeks v. United States established a critical principle regarding illegally obtained evidence. What is this principle called?

<p>The Exclusionary Rule (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Which case created an exception to the exclusionary rule, allowing the use of evidence obtained through a search warrant that was later deemed invalid, provided the officers acted in reasonable reliance on the warrant?

<p>United States v. Leon (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

In United States v. Drayton, what did the Supreme Court rule regarding bus searches and the Fourth Amendment?

<p>Police officers do not need to inform passengers of their right to refuse a search on a bus, as long as consent is voluntary. (D)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Which case established the 'stop and frisk' exception to the Fourth Amendment, allowing police to briefly detain and search individuals based on reasonable suspicion?

<p>Terry v. Ohio (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

The inevitable discovery doctrine, an exception to the exclusionary rule, was established in which of the following cases?

<p>Nix v. Williams (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

In what scenario does the 'public safety exception' to Miranda rights, as established in New York v. Quarles, most commonly apply?

<p>When there is an immediate threat to public safety. (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

What specific concern prompted the Supreme Court's decision in Maryland v. Wilson, which allows officers to order passengers out of a vehicle during a traffic stop?

<p>Officer safety. (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

The case of United States v. Salerno addressed the issue of preventative detention. Under what circumstances did the Court rule preventative detention was permissible?

<p>Only for defendants considered a flight risk or danger to the community. (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Morrissey v. Brewer established due process requirements for parole revocation hearings. Which of the following is an example of a right granted by this case?

<p>The right to confront and cross-examine witnesses in parole revocation hearings. (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

The ruling in Mempa v. Rhay primarily concerns the rights of defendants during what type of proceeding?

<p>Probation revocation hearings. (D)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Gagnon v. Scarpelli extended certain due process rights to probationers. Which previous case's ruling did this decision closely mirror?

<p>Morrissey v. Brewer. (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

The constitutional right to counsel, as established in Gideon v. Wainwright, applies to defendants in what type of proceedings?

<p>Only felony cases. (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

What was the direct outcome of the Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia (1972) regarding capital punishment?

<p>It led to a temporary suspension of the death penalty in the United States. (A)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Weeks v. United States established the exclusionary rule. To what level of government did this ruling initially apply?

<p>Federal government only. (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

In United States v. Leon, the Supreme Court created an exception to the exclusionary rule. What is this exception generally called?

<p>The good faith exception. (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

United States v. Drayton deals with searches conducted on buses. What key factor determines the legality of these searches, according to the Supreme Court's ruling?

<p>Whether passengers voluntarily consent to the search. (C)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Which case allows statements obtained without Miranda warnings to be admissible at trial if they were prompted by a reasonable concern for public safety?

<p>New York v. Quarles (D)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

What is the most accurate description of 'reasonable suspicion' as it relates to police stops, based on Terry v. Ohio?

<p>A legal standard requiring less evidence than probable cause but more than a mere hunch. (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

How did Gagnon v. Scarpelli build upon the ruling in Morrissey v. Brewer concerning parolees?

<p>It extended similar due process rights to probationers. (B)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Which case made the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule applicable to state courts through the Fourteenth Amendment?

<p>Mapp v. Ohio (D)</p>
Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Terry v. Ohio

Allows a police officer to stop and frisk a suspect on reasonable suspicion of a crime.

Nix v. Williams

Inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence is admissible if it would have inevitably been discovered through legal means.

New York v. Quarles

Public safety exception to Miranda; allows unwarned interrogation if public safety is at risk.

Maryland v. Wilson

During a traffic stop, officers may order passengers to exit the vehicle pending completion of the stop.

Signup and view all the flashcards

United States v. Salerno

Preventive detention is constitutional; those accused of serious crimes can be detained before trial if they pose a flight risk or danger to the community.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Morrissey v. Brewer

Established due process rights for parole revocation hearings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Mempa v. Rhay

Right to counsel at probation revocation hearings, when sentencing is deferred.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Gagnon v. Scarpelli

Extends right to counsel to probation revocation hearings under certain circumstances.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Gideon v. Wainwright

Right to counsel in felony cases; states must provide attorneys to defendants who cannot afford them.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Furman v. Georgia

Death penalty, as administered, constituted cruel and unusual punishment; led to a moratorium on the death penalty.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Weeks v. United States

Established the exclusionary rule in federal courts; illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible.

Signup and view all the flashcards

United States v. Leon

Good faith exception to the exclusionary rule; evidence obtained in reasonable reliance on a defective search warrant is admissible.

Signup and view all the flashcards

United States v. Drayton

Officers are not required to inform bus passengers of their right to refuse a search.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Terry v. Ohio: Established the "stop and frisk" exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, allowing police to briefly detain and search individuals based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
  • Nix v. Williams: Introduced the "inevitable discovery" exception to the exclusionary rule, permitting illegally obtained evidence to be admitted if it would have inevitably been discovered through lawful means.
  • New York v. Quarles: Created the "public safety" exception to Miranda rights, allowing police to question suspects without Miranda warnings if public safety is at risk.
  • Maryland v. Wilson: Extended the authority of police officers during traffic stops, permitting them to order passengers out of a vehicle during a lawful stop.
  • United States v. Salerno: Upheld the Bail Reform Act of 1984, which allows for the preventive detention of individuals if they pose a threat to the safety of the community.
  • Morrissey v. Brewer: Established due process rights for parolees during revocation hearings, including the right to a preliminary hearing and a final revocation hearing.
  • Mempa v. Rhay: Granted probationers the right to counsel during revocation hearings where sentencing is deferred.
  • Gagnon v. Scarpelli: Extended due process rights to probationers in revocation hearings, but determined that the right to counsel should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
  • Gideon v. Wainwright: Established the right to counsel for indigent defendants in state criminal trials, requiring states to provide attorneys for those who cannot afford them.
  • Furman v. Georgia: Resulted in the Supreme Court striking down existing death penalty laws, finding them to be arbitrary and discriminatory, which led to a temporary moratorium on capital punishment.
  • Weeks v. United States: Established the exclusionary rule in federal courts, preventing illegally obtained evidence from being admissible in trial.
  • United States v. Leon: Created the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule, allowing illegally obtained evidence to be admitted if police relied on a warrant that appeared valid but was later found to be defective.
  • United States v. Drayton: Ruled that police officers are not required to inform bus passengers of their right to refuse a search, as long as consent is voluntary.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Case Law
5 questions

Case Law

RecommendedGoshenite avatar
RecommendedGoshenite
Forfeiture and Constitutionality Quiz
12 questions
Criminal Procedure Quiz
43 questions

Criminal Procedure Quiz

PatriWilliamsite3719 avatar
PatriWilliamsite3719
Landmark Criminal Procedure Cases
20 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser