Landmark Legal Cases Quiz
5 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In Heaven v Pender, why was the claimant allowed to claim compensation?

  • The claimant's employer supported the claim
  • The claimant suffered minor injuries
  • A contractual obligation may extend to a non-contracting party in cases of negligence (correct)
  • The claimant had a direct contract with the defendant

    • What was the occupation of the claimant in Winterbottom v Wright?

  • Shipbuilder
  • Coach driver (correct)
  • Painter
  • Staging supplier

    • In Winterbottom v Wright, why could the driver not recover compensation from the builders of the coach?

  • The Postmaster General did not support the driver's claim
  • He was not a party to the contract under which the coach was supplied (correct)
  • The builders of the coach were not found liable for the defect
  • The driver did not suffer serious injuries as claimed

    • What was the occupation of the claimant in Heaven v Pender?

    <p>Painter</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle was established in Heaven v Pender regarding non-contracting parties?

    <p>A non-contracting party may claim compensation in cases of negligence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    More Like This

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases Impact Quiz
    5 questions

    Landmark Supreme Court Cases Impact Quiz

    GutsyAmethyst avatar
    GutsyAmethyst
    Legal Cases Quiz
    17 questions

    Legal Cases Quiz

    WellReceivedSun avatar
    WellReceivedSun
    US Legal History Quiz
    12 questions

    US Legal History Quiz

    VersatileKelpie avatar
    VersatileKelpie
    US Supreme Court Cases Quiz
    35 questions

    Supreme Court Cases Quiz: Test Your Knowledge of Landmark Decisions

    SupportiveCobalt avatar
    SupportiveCobalt
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser