Landmark Legal Cases Quiz
5 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

In Heaven v Pender, why was the claimant allowed to claim compensation?

  • The claimant's employer supported the claim
  • The claimant suffered minor injuries
  • A contractual obligation may extend to a non-contracting party in cases of negligence (correct)
  • The claimant had a direct contract with the defendant

    • What was the occupation of the claimant in Winterbottom v Wright?

  • Shipbuilder
  • Coach driver (correct)
  • Painter
  • Staging supplier

    • In Winterbottom v Wright, why could the driver not recover compensation from the builders of the coach?

  • The Postmaster General did not support the driver's claim
  • He was not a party to the contract under which the coach was supplied (correct)
  • The builders of the coach were not found liable for the defect
  • The driver did not suffer serious injuries as claimed

    • What was the occupation of the claimant in Heaven v Pender?

    <p>Painter</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle was established in Heaven v Pender regarding non-contracting parties?

    <p>A non-contracting party may claim compensation in cases of negligence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser