Podcast
Questions and Answers
offer need to be clear, certain and contain all the terms
offer need to be clear, certain and contain all the terms
- Partridge v Crittenden (correct)
- Smith v Hughes
- Gibson v Manchester City Council
- carili v Carbolic Smoke Ball
Advertisments are an invitation to treat
Advertisments are an invitation to treat
- Grainger v Gough
- Ramsgate v Victoria
- Great Northen Railway Company v Witham
- Partridge v Crittenden (correct)
An adversitmenet used for a unilateral offer is a valid offer
An adversitmenet used for a unilateral offer is a valid offer
- Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (correct)
- Errington v Errington
- Dickinson v Dodds
- Lampleigh v Braithwaite
A counter offer is not a valid acceptance as it destroys the original offer.
A counter offer is not a valid acceptance as it destroys the original offer.
As a general rule, a promise to accept less is not a binding promise.
As a general rule, a promise to accept less is not a binding promise.
There are three exceptions to the general rule that a promise to accept less is not legally binding.
There are three exceptions to the general rule that a promise to accept less is not legally binding.
What is the exception to the rule set out in Stilk v Myrik?
What is the exception to the rule set out in Stilk v Myrik?
In order to revoke a unilateral offer the offeror must take reasonable steps to notify those who might be likley to accept.
In order to revoke a unilateral offer the offeror must take reasonable steps to notify those who might be likley to accept.
The postal rule comes from which case?
The postal rule comes from which case?
A request for information in not an acceptance following
A request for information in not an acceptance following
Past consideration is not valid consideration following
Past consideration is not valid consideration following
The exceptions for a promise to accept less include; a) a promise for less at an ealier time, b) a promise at a different place or c) a promise for less in a different form following
The exceptions for a promise to accept less include; a) a promise for less at an ealier time, b) a promise at a different place or c) a promise for less in a different form following
Promissary Estoppel is a shield not a sword
Promissary Estoppel is a shield not a sword
Promissory estoppel does not requires new consideration, therefore it is not liked by the courts
Promissory estoppel does not requires new consideration, therefore it is not liked by the courts
Existing contractual obligations owed to a third party may be valid consideration for a new promise following
Existing contractual obligations owed to a third party may be valid consideration for a new promise following
An exception to the rule set out in Roscorla v Thomas was laid out in which case?
An exception to the rule set out in Roscorla v Thomas was laid out in which case?
The second requirement for promissory estoppel requires the promisee to have relied on that promise to their detriment following
The second requirement for promissory estoppel requires the promisee to have relied on that promise to their detriment following
A requirement for promissary estoppel requires
A requirement for promissary estoppel requires
Third party revocation is where an offer is revoked by someone other than the offoror following
Third party revocation is where an offer is revoked by someone other than the offoror following
silence is not a form of acceptance following
silence is not a form of acceptance following
Parent and child agreements have no intention to create legal relations
Parent and child agreements have no intention to create legal relations
commerial contracts where one or more of the parties is a business, there is an intention to create legal relations
commerial contracts where one or more of the parties is a business, there is an intention to create legal relations
