Kelsen and Rawls on Judicial Review
10 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What does Kelsen argue is necessary when making a decision?

  • Shared premises among all parties
  • Compromise on most issues
  • Majority agreement on all matters
  • Ultimate truths for decision making (correct)
  • According to Rawls, what is the basis for deriving binding conclusions?

  • Ultimate truths known only to the sovereign
  • The authority of historical legal traditions
  • Majority rule in all circumstances
  • Shared premises and normative argumentation (correct)
  • What distinguishes Hobbes' view of the social contract from that of Locke and Rousseau?

  • Hobbes requires a direct vote on all issues
  • Hobbes supports individual sovereignty over collective governance
  • Hobbes emphasizes safety and protection by the sovereign (correct)
  • Hobbes allows greater freedom than Locke
  • How does Rousseau's perspective on the social contract differ from Hobbes and Locke?

    <p>Rousseau maintains that individuals retain their freedom while seeking support</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a fundamental aspect of the Grundnorm according to the different theories presented?

    <p>It reflects the current state of legal and social agreements</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary basis for the validity of law according to Kelsen?

    <p>The overarching norm known as Grundnorm</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does Rawls' view on the legality of law differ from Kelsen's?

    <p>Kelsen maintains that all legal laws are valid regardless of justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do both Kelsen and Rawls reject concerning democratic processes?

    <p>The necessity of a referendum on moral issues</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is Kelsen's stance on the intrinsic merit of overarching norms?

    <p>Their legality is paramount, not their justness.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which aspect do Rawls's and Kelsen's theories particularly diverge?

    <p>The relationship between legality and justice</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Kelsen and Rawls on Judicial Review and Law

    • Both Kelsen and Rawls support judicial review.

    Kelsen's Theory of Law

    • Kelsen's theory emphasizes the formal validity of law, not its content.
    • The validity of a law hinges on its connection to the Grundnorm (fundamental norm).
    • The Grundnorm's intrinsic merit and justice aren't evaluated; only its legality matters.
    • Legality hinges on the law's formal structure.
    • Kelsen's theory reflects a degree of political realism.

    Rawls' Theory of Law

    • Rawls' theory connects law to justice.
    • Law is valid if the legislative power conforms to the constitution, assuming the populace endorses the constitution's foundational ideals.
    • Justice is rooted in fundamental constitutional principles.
    • A law can be legally valid yet invalid by justice standards (contrasting Kelsen).

    Law and the Reasonable

    • Both Kelsen and Rawls oppose the introduction of absolute truths into the democratic process (e.g., establishing religion via vote).
    • Certain matters are unsuitable for majority vote.
    • Kelsen argues for ultimate truths as a basis for decisions; otherwise compromise becomes boundless.
    • Rawls proposes deriving conclusions from shared premises instead of absolute truths, aiming for consensus.
    • Rawls champions the normative argumentation process and hope for shared conclusions.

    The Groundlessness of the Grundnorm

    • Kelsen's Grundnorm's origin is problematic and reflective of existing legal systems.
    • The Grundnorm resembles concepts of constituent power from social contract theories.
    • Hobbes' perspective: Constituent power seeks protection from the sovereign.
    • Locke's perspective: Constituent power contributes to a commonwealth seeking protection of rights (life, liberty, property).
    • Rousseau's perspective: Constituent power craves the same freedoms pre-state.
    • Legal theorists develop accounts of the Grundnorm retrospectively.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the theories of Kelsen and Rawls regarding judicial review and the nature of law. This quiz delves into their contrasting views on legality and justice, emphasizing Kelsen's focus on formal validity and Rawls' connection of law to constitutional ideals. Test your understanding of their key concepts and theories.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser