Judgment and Critical Thinking in Urban Planning

Questions and Answers

Which of the following problems is a question of judgment that requires critical thinking? (Select one)

What is the most effective and safest way to design a roadway system to achieve efficiency? (correct)

What is the fastest speed at which a car can travel between two distances?

What is the most efficient speed at which one might travel between two locations?

What is the most scenic route one might travel between two locations?

What critical thinking strategy should the employee employ to clarify the issue?

Research the economic impact of every national monument in every state.

Determine the main sources of potential information and begin research. (correct)

Write out all arguments that both favor and oppose the monument for the governor's review.

Determine whether the governor supports or opposes the monument designation.

Discuss the issue with other employees in the governor's office to see how they feel about it.

Which of the following statements are true regarding the bike lane experts?

The evidence of both Expert A and Expert B was accurate.

Expert A's evidence was accurate, and Expert B's evidence was inaccurate.

It is not possible to know the accuracy of either expert's evidence from the information given. (correct)

The evidence of both Expert A and Expert B was inaccurate.

Expert B's evidence was accurate, and Expert A's evidence was inaccurate.

What primary questions would the city want to ask to measure the implications of the proposed parking solution?

<p>Have we identified the negative implications of the proposal?</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Judgment and Critical Thinking

Critical thinking often involves questions of judgment that require evaluation, such as determining the safest and most efficient design for roadway systems.
Questions such as the fastest speed or the most scenic route are objective, while designing effective systems requires subjective reasoning.

Research and Economic Impact

When tasked with evaluating the economic impact of a new national monument, identifying primary information sources is crucial for clarity.
Engaging with opinions or other employees can provide context but may not directly contribute to the objective research needed.

Expert Opinions on Bike Lanes

A city council funded bike lane installation, facing disagreement on routes, highlights the complexity of expert evidence regarding safety and traffic flow.
Expert A recommends residential streets for increased biker safety, while Expert B argues that main corridors offer more accessibility and safety.
Post-installation accidents raise questions about the validity of both experts’ evidence and the sufficiency of information to determine accuracy.

Relevance of Expert Evidence

Both experts’ contributions to the bike lane decision were considered relevant, despite differing conclusions.
Evaluating the evidence of both experts is essential in discussions surrounding safety measures, even when outcomes are unfavorable.

Parking Solutions Around New Arena

The construction of a new sports arena exacerbates existing parking issues in downtown areas, prompting residents to propose permit-only parking for their convenience.
Key questions for the city regarding parking permits involve the identification of both benefits and drawbacks associated with this solution.

Description

Explore the complexities of judgment and critical thinking required in urban planning and design. This quiz covers economic impact evaluation, expert opinions on bike lanes, and the subjectivity versus objectivity in roadway systems. Test your understanding of these critical concepts.