Italian Electoral Laws Case Study

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is a primary feature of the Legge Calderoli?

Extended the voting age

Implemented a proportional system with a majority bonus (correct)

Allowed for open party lists

Direct voter influence in candidate selection

The Italian Constitutional Court completely upheld the Legge Calderoli without any changes.

False

What article of the Italian Constitution outlines what makes a law inadmissible?

Article 75

The centre-left in Italy supports a referendum to ___________ the Legge Calderoli.

abrogate Signup and view all the answers

Match the constitutional aspects to their descriptions:

Sovereignty in Italy = Belongs to the people within constitutional limits Referendum restrictions = Cannot address changes to the EU membership without constitutional change Legge Calderoli's criticism = Its constitutionality due to disproportionate majority bonus Article 75 = Defines inadmissibility of certain laws Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a reason for the criticism of the Legge Calderoli?

Excessive voter involvement in elections Signup and view all the answers

The Scottish Independence Referendum question was unanimously accepted as neutral in framing.

False Signup and view all the answers

What significant outcome arose from the 2014 ruling by the Italian Constitutional Court regarding the Legge Calderoli?

Parts of the legislation were rendered obsolete. Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary role of the Electoral Commission in the UK?

To oversee fair electoral processes Signup and view all the answers

The Legge Truffa guaranteed a coalition 65% of the seats as long as they received over 50% of the popular vote.

True Signup and view all the answers

What significant change was made in the Italian electoral system in 1993?

Adoption of the Mattarellum mixed electoral system Signup and view all the answers

The __________ system is also known as First Past the Post (FPTP).

Single-Member District Plurality Signup and view all the answers

Match the following electoral laws or systems to their descriptions:

Mattarellum = Mixed electoral system adopted in 1993 Legge Truffa = Assigned 65% of seats to a coalition Italicum = New electoral law approved in 2016 FPTP = System where the candidate with the most votes is elected Signup and view all the answers

What percentage of seats in the Mattarellum system were assigned through First Past the Post?

75% Signup and view all the answers

In the 2005 electoral law, proportional representation was entirely eliminated.

False Signup and view all the answers

What was the purpose of the Constitutional Court's intervention in January 2014?

To strike down contested aspects of the electoral law Signup and view all the answers

The Italicum introduced a single threshold of __________ to qualify for seat allocation.

3% Signup and view all the answers

Which mechanism determines the number of votes required to win a seat in a proportional representation system?

Electoral Formula Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Italian Electoral Laws: A Case Study

Introduced in 2005, Legge Calderoli implemented a proportional electoral system with a substantial majority bonus for coalitions securing a relative majority in each chamber. This aimed to enhance governmental stability.
The law faced major criticism for restricting voter influence in candidate selection through closed party lists, potentially distorting representation.
Significant controversy surrounded the constitutionality of the law, leading to a partial invalidation by the Italian Constitutional Court in 2014. The court criticized the disproportionate majority bonus and lack of voter preference options.
The court's decision rendered portions of the law obsolete, prompting subsequent electoral reforms. Referendum initiatives are ongoing.
The center-right opposes a referendum, viewing the law as already deemed unconstitutional. The center-left, conversely, advocates for a referendum to repeal it.
Article 75 of the Italian Constitution outlines inadmissible legislative topics such as tax laws, amnesty, pardons, and treaty ratification authorizations.
Italian sovereignty rests with the people but is limited by the Constitution, making a referendum on EU departure impossible without constitutional change. Referendums are restricted to single, non-heterogeneous questions.

The Scottish Independence Referendum

The 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum, while neutral on the surface, faced critiques for the potential for influencing voter decisions.
Critics contended that questions framed in an affirmative sense can subtly nudge voters towards the affirmative answer.
This triggered electoral commission review, recommending adjustments to ensure impartial and clear wording.

Electoral Systems

An electoral system dictates the rules regarding elections and how votes translate into parliamentary seats (or president).
Key components include: electoral laws, franchise rules, oversight mechanisms, electoral campaigns, and electoral formulas.
The Italian Constitution does not delineate the precise parliament electoral system but mandates its regulation through ordinary laws.

Italian Electoral System (1948-1993)

Prior to 1993, Italy's system was predominantly proportional.
Proportional Representation uses multimember districts and a quota or divisor to determine seats based on votes won.
The 1953 "Legge Truffa" attempted majoritarian reforms but was soon repealed.

1993: The Referendum and Mattarellum Law

A 1993 referendum resulted in the Mattarellum, a mixed electoral system.
75% of seats were allocated via a plurality system (FPTP), while the remaining 25% were assigned proportionately.

Plurality Systems (FPTP)

FPTP systems utilize single-member districts with voters selecting a single candidate.
Successful candidates receive the most votes, not necessarily an absolute majority.

2005: Proportional Representation with Majoritarian Correctives

The 2005 electoral law brought back proportional representation with block lists compiled by party leaders and majoritarian correctives.
This ensured a bonus for coalitions obtaining a significant vote share.

Constitutional Court Intervention (2014)

The Constitutional Court invalidated contested aspects of the 2005 electoral law, eliminating closed lists of candidates and a bonus system without a minimum threshold.

2016: The Italicum Law

This law, effective in 2016, primarily applied to the Chamber of Deputies.
It utilized a proportional distribution of seats with national-level voting and 100 constituencies.
Key features included tiered vote thresholds, a first-preference vote, and gender quotas.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Explore the complexities of the Italian electoral laws introduced in 2005, focusing on the Legge Calderoli's implications for voter representation and governmental stability. This case study highlights the criticisms regarding closed party lists and the subsequent judicial actions that led to reforms. Engage with the ongoing debates surrounding its constitutional status.