Islamic Law Punishments Quiz

Retaliation punishment in Islamic law where the victim's heirs can seek the death penalty for the intentional killing of their relative.

Retaliation punishment in Islamic law where the victim can seek an equivalent punishment for the intentional injury that resulted in the loss of a limb or its function.

A form of compensation paid in Islamic law for unlawful killing or injury.

A specific punishment outlined in Islamic law for certain offenses.

The punishment for adultery, sexual defamation, and drinking alcohol in Islamic law.

The punishment for burglary, rebellion, and corruption in Islamic law. It can include maiming, crucifixion, banishment, or death.

The punishment for sodomy, rape, and incest in Islamic law.

The legal concept in Islamic law where the victim or their heirs can choose between Qisas (retaliation) and Diya (compensation).

The harshest form of punishment in ancient times, often used for serious crimes like adultery.

A specific punishment for adultery in Islamic law, involving the throwing of stones.

Punishments based on the judge's discretion, ranging from imprisonment to public humiliation.

A discretionary punishment that could involve imprisonment, banishment or even public exposure.

Punishment for a false witness, which could involve public humiliation and forty lashes.

The discretion of the judge to punish crimes without specific laws or insufficient evidence.

The ancient Indian punishment system was characterized by its severity and often harsh methods.

The practice of punishing wrongdoers by taking their lives, primarily used as a form of crime deterrence.

A legal principle that aims to deter crime by punishing wrongdoers, setting an example for others to avoid similar actions.

The belief that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed, resembling the phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."

A primary objective of punishment in Hindu society where the offender is incapacitated to prevent them from repeating their crime.

The use of punishment as a public example to discourage future wrongdoing.

A type of punishment in ancient India involving verbal reprimand or advice.

A type of punishment in ancient India involving censure or criticism.

A type of punishment in ancient India involving confiscation of possessions or valuables.

An act that a person is compelled to do against their will, often due to threats or coercion. It involves a lack of free choice and autonomy.

A situation where a person commits an act out of extreme necessity to prevent a greater harm, such as stealing food to survive.

An action done by mistake, without intention or awareness of the consequences.

The circumstances surrounding an event or action, including the context and environment.

The individual's state of mind, motivations, and psychological factors that contribute to their actions.

The overlap of external and internal factors that influence a person's actions and behavior.

The consideration of all relevant circumstances, both internal and external, when assessing guilt and punishment.

Punishing an offender based on an evaluation of all relevant external and internal factors.

A punishment that is proportionate to the crime committed; its severity does not exceed the harm caused by the offense.

The idea that punishment should not be used as a tool for revenge or to inflict more suffering than necessary.

A theory that suggests criminals forfeit their rights by committing a crime and therefore deserve punishment.

A form of punishment that aims to deter future crime by making the consequences outweigh the potential benefits.

A theory that argues the purpose of punishment is to rehabilitate criminals and help them reintegrate into society.

An approach to punishment that emphasizes the restoration of justice and the repair of harm caused by the crime.

A philosophical theory that views punishment as a means of balancing the scales of justice by inflicting pain on the offender commensurate with the harm caused.

The degree to which someone is involved in a crime, ranging from direct involvement to indirect assistance.

A theory that advocates for punishment to discourage potential criminals by showing the consequences of wrongdoing. It focuses on preventing future crime by making the costs of committing crime outweigh the benefits.

A philosophy focused on maximizing happiness and well-being for the greatest number of people. It suggests that punishments should be designed to prevent crime and ensure public safety.

A version of utilitarianism that focuses on the overall benefit of a specific action. It suggests that an act is good if it brings greater happiness to the most people even if it involves potential harm to a few.

A version of utilitarianism that focuses on following rules that bring the greatest happiness to the most people. It suggests that an action is good if it follows a rule that generally leads to better consequences for society.

A criticism of Deterrent Theory that argues it treats individuals as mere instruments to achieve the greater good, ignoring their individual rights and autonomy.

A criticism of Deterrent Theory that argues it prioritizes preventing crime over ensuring justice. It suggests that punishing someone may be justified even if their guilt is uncertain, solely to deter others.

A criticism of Deterrent Theory that argues it doesn't address the underlying reformation of a criminal or offer solutions for rehabilitation. It prioritizes crime prevention over fixing the root cause of criminal behavior.

A key criticism of Deterrent Theory that argues it is not always effective in deterring crime. It suggests that people may still commit crimes despite knowing potential consequences, driven by various motives and circumstances.