Podcast
Questions and Answers
Regarding physical attacks, under what specific circumstance would altering the sequence of executed instructions provide the least exploitable vulnerability, assuming optimal countermeasure deployment against side-channel information leakage?
Regarding physical attacks, under what specific circumstance would altering the sequence of executed instructions provide the least exploitable vulnerability, assuming optimal countermeasure deployment against side-channel information leakage?
- When diverting execution from a complex, multi-stage key derivation function to a simpler, less secure alternative, with rigorous input validation in place.
- When skipping a non-essential memory scrubbing routine following a sensitive key operation, assuming the memory controller implements probabilistic row hammering protection. (correct)
- When altering a conditional branch responsible for dispatching a cryptographic primitive, such that the overall latency of the computation is preserved.
- When duplicating a non-cryptographically-relevant instruction to subtly increase power consumption during unrelated operations, assuming sophisticated power analysis countermeasures.
In the context of side-channel attacks, under what very specific circumstances would the defense strategy of employing a dual-rail precharge logic with dynamic power consumption balancing be rendered inadequate, assuming a highly skilled adversary with access to advanced analytical tools?
In the context of side-channel attacks, under what very specific circumstances would the defense strategy of employing a dual-rail precharge logic with dynamic power consumption balancing be rendered inadequate, assuming a highly skilled adversary with access to advanced analytical tools?
- If the inter-rail capacitance mismatch surpasses the technology node's tolerance threshold, allowing for differential power analysis sensitive to second-order effects. (correct)
- If deployed within a physically shielded environment that attenuates electromagnetic emanations, complicating remote signal acquisition.
- If used in conjunction with threshold voltage randomization across the chip, leading to unpredictable variations in timing and power profiles.
- If the clock frequency is sufficiently randomized to disrupt signal averaging during power analysis, mitigating first-order leakage.
What quintessential characteristic distinguishes a 'white-box' evaluation from a 'grey-box' evaluation in the context of security certifications, particularly concerning intellectual property rights and evaluator access?
What quintessential characteristic distinguishes a 'white-box' evaluation from a 'grey-box' evaluation in the context of security certifications, particularly concerning intellectual property rights and evaluator access?
- White-box evaluations permit reverse engineering activities and vulnerability disclosure, whereas grey-box evaluations prohibit them to protect vendor interests.
- White-box evaluations are conducted exclusively by internal audit teams within the vendor organization, whereas grey-box evaluations are performed by accredited external labs.
- White-box evaluations necessitate unrestricted access to complete source code and design specifications, while grey-box evaluations involve access only to compiled binaries. (correct)
- White-box evaluations require explicit consent from all stakeholders for each vulnerability discovered, unlike grey-box evaluations where pre-established disclosure protocols govern outcomes.
In the context of Common Criteria (CC) certification for secure microcontrollers, which explicit evaluation assurance level component mandates rigorous, independent confirmation that configuration management preserves the integrity of the Target of Evaluation (TOE) throughout its lifecycle?
In the context of Common Criteria (CC) certification for secure microcontrollers, which explicit evaluation assurance level component mandates rigorous, independent confirmation that configuration management preserves the integrity of the Target of Evaluation (TOE) throughout its lifecycle?
What inherent property of the Welch's t-test renders it particularly sensitive to detecting side-channel leakage in scenarios characterized by non-Gaussian error distributions, such as those encountered in power analysis attacks against masked cryptographic implementations?
What inherent property of the Welch's t-test renders it particularly sensitive to detecting side-channel leakage in scenarios characterized by non-Gaussian error distributions, such as those encountered in power analysis attacks against masked cryptographic implementations?
Considering the objectives of Common Criteria (CC) evaluation, which potential outcome would directly contravene its fundamental aim of promoting international reciprocity in security certifications, thereby undermining its credibility and impact on global trade?
Considering the objectives of Common Criteria (CC) evaluation, which potential outcome would directly contravene its fundamental aim of promoting international reciprocity in security certifications, thereby undermining its credibility and impact on global trade?
In the context of EMV chip technology, what critical modification to the card's architecture would provide the most robust defense against sophisticated relay attacks, assuming an adversary possessing complete control over the communication channel between the card and the terminal?
In the context of EMV chip technology, what critical modification to the card's architecture would provide the most robust defense against sophisticated relay attacks, assuming an adversary possessing complete control over the communication channel between the card and the terminal?
Assuming a scenario where a cryptographic module certified under Common Criteria (CC) is found to contain a previously unknown vulnerability after certification, under what very narrow set of conditions could the certification body revoke the certificate?
Assuming a scenario where a cryptographic module certified under Common Criteria (CC) is found to contain a previously unknown vulnerability after certification, under what very narrow set of conditions could the certification body revoke the certificate?
Within the domain of side-channel analysis countermeasures, what key attribute distinguishes algorithmic masking from hardware-based masking techniques, specifically concerning their respective security strengths and implementation complexities?
Within the domain of side-channel analysis countermeasures, what key attribute distinguishes algorithmic masking from hardware-based masking techniques, specifically concerning their respective security strengths and implementation complexities?
What principal limitation restricts the direct applicability of formal verification techniques, such as model checking or theorem proving, to conclusively demonstrate the absence of side-channel vulnerabilities in a complex System-on-Chip (SoC)?
What principal limitation restricts the direct applicability of formal verification techniques, such as model checking or theorem proving, to conclusively demonstrate the absence of side-channel vulnerabilities in a complex System-on-Chip (SoC)?
In the context of fault injection attacks, which specific type of laser-induced fault is best suited for selectively resetting individual bits within a target register inside a secure microcontroller, assuming precise control over the laser's wavelength, pulse duration, and focal point?
In the context of fault injection attacks, which specific type of laser-induced fault is best suited for selectively resetting individual bits within a target register inside a secure microcontroller, assuming precise control over the laser's wavelength, pulse duration, and focal point?
Considering that side-channel analysis countermeasures often introduce performance overhead, under what highly constrained scenario would implementing loop unrolling offer a net security benefit against power analysis attacks on embedded cryptographic systems?
Considering that side-channel analysis countermeasures often introduce performance overhead, under what highly constrained scenario would implementing loop unrolling offer a net security benefit against power analysis attacks on embedded cryptographic systems?
In the context of security certifications, what specific challenge arises from the continuous evolution of attack methodologies and technological advancements, particularly regarding the long-term validity and relevance of existing certifications?
In the context of security certifications, what specific challenge arises from the continuous evolution of attack methodologies and technological advancements, particularly regarding the long-term validity and relevance of existing certifications?
What fundamental premise underpins the effectiveness of using electromagnetic (EM) emanations as a side-channel for cryptanalysis, considering the inherent noise and complexity associated with capturing and interpreting these signals?
What fundamental premise underpins the effectiveness of using electromagnetic (EM) emanations as a side-channel for cryptanalysis, considering the inherent noise and complexity associated with capturing and interpreting these signals?
Within the EMV chip card ecosystem, what specific security rationale justifies the mandate for private certification bodies, as opposed to relying solely on government or standards organizations for security evaluations?
Within the EMV chip card ecosystem, what specific security rationale justifies the mandate for private certification bodies, as opposed to relying solely on government or standards organizations for security evaluations?
Considering the inherent limitations of EMV chip technology in the evolving payment landscape, mainly for online sales; what emerging trend poses the greatest challenge to maintaining secure and seamless transactions?
Considering the inherent limitations of EMV chip technology in the evolving payment landscape, mainly for online sales; what emerging trend poses the greatest challenge to maintaining secure and seamless transactions?
In scenarios where power analysis attacks target masked cryptographic implementations, under which precise condition would zero-offset higher-order differential power analysis (HO-DPA) yield a statistically significant improvement in signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional HO-DPA?
In scenarios where power analysis attacks target masked cryptographic implementations, under which precise condition would zero-offset higher-order differential power analysis (HO-DPA) yield a statistically significant improvement in signal-to-noise ratio compared to conventional HO-DPA?
Assuming unfettered physical access to a secure microcontroller employing a hardware-based true random number generator (TRNG), which specific fault injection technique poses the most significant threat to its long-term entropy production rate, assuming minimal environmental disturbances?
Assuming unfettered physical access to a secure microcontroller employing a hardware-based true random number generator (TRNG), which specific fault injection technique poses the most significant threat to its long-term entropy production rate, assuming minimal environmental disturbances?
Within the context of physical unclonable functions (PUFs), what inherent trade-off exists between their reliability and uniqueness, considering variations in environmental conditions and manufacturing processes?
Within the context of physical unclonable functions (PUFs), what inherent trade-off exists between their reliability and uniqueness, considering variations in environmental conditions and manufacturing processes?
Concerning side-channel attacks on cryptographic implementations, what is the fundamental difference between profiled and unprofiled attacks with respect to their reliance on prior knowledge?
Concerning side-channel attacks on cryptographic implementations, what is the fundamental difference between profiled and unprofiled attacks with respect to their reliance on prior knowledge?
What constitutes the most critical difference between software and hardware implementations of cryptographic algorithms from a side-channel attack perspective, mainly concerning vulnerability landscape?
What constitutes the most critical difference between software and hardware implementations of cryptographic algorithms from a side-channel attack perspective, mainly concerning vulnerability landscape?
Which of the following is the most accurate description of the 'TOM' adversary model in the context of physical security assessments of cryptographic devices?
Which of the following is the most accurate description of the 'TOM' adversary model in the context of physical security assessments of cryptographic devices?
What is the most significant limitation of relying solely on Common Criteria (CC) certification for an embedded system's security posture, as the world changes and different attacks develop?
What is the most significant limitation of relying solely on Common Criteria (CC) certification for an embedded system's security posture, as the world changes and different attacks develop?
Why invest in security evaluation, if that may lead to withdraw the product or change it in different way? Choose the most correct:
Why invest in security evaluation, if that may lead to withdraw the product or change it in different way? Choose the most correct:
In the context of evaluating the security of cryptographic implementations, what critical information is conveyed by metrics that evaluate device resilience?
In the context of evaluating the security of cryptographic implementations, what critical information is conveyed by metrics that evaluate device resilience?
In the world of EMVco that uses secure composability (chip, OS, application), what is the crucial element?
In the world of EMVco that uses secure composability (chip, OS, application), what is the crucial element?
Side Channel Attacks focuses on:
Side Channel Attacks focuses on:
What is the relationship between Fault Injection and Side Channel Attacks?
What is the relationship between Fault Injection and Side Channel Attacks?
What is the difference between profiled attacks and unprofiled attacks in side channel analysis?
What is the difference between profiled attacks and unprofiled attacks in side channel analysis?
The power signature is an EM scan of a chip surface, what can be retrieved from it?
The power signature is an EM scan of a chip surface, what can be retrieved from it?
In side channel analysis, what is the Target?
In side channel analysis, what is the Target?
What does physical side channel analysis allow?
What does physical side channel analysis allow?
The evaluation sponsor typically has to make code changes. For what is this most likely?
The evaluation sponsor typically has to make code changes. For what is this most likely?
If the device you're testing has a secure boot and root of trust, is it vulnerable to a physical attack?
If the device you're testing has a secure boot and root of trust, is it vulnerable to a physical attack?
Flashcards
Side Channel Attacks
Side Channel Attacks
Physical attacks can recover cryptographic keys, NN training data and reverse engineer code.
Fault Injection
Fault Injection
Physical attacks can recover cryptographic keys, modify memory and register contents, and alter the sequence of executed instructions.
The adversary - TOM
The adversary - TOM
An adversary who tampers, observes, and modifies hardware to extract sensitive information or bypass security measures.
Unprofiled Attacks
Unprofiled Attacks
Signup and view all the flashcards
Profiled Attacks
Profiled Attacks
Signup and view all the flashcards
Leakage detection
Leakage detection
Signup and view all the flashcards
Power Analysis
Power Analysis
Signup and view all the flashcards
EM Scan
EM Scan
Signup and view all the flashcards
Security Evaluation Services
Security Evaluation Services
Signup and view all the flashcards
Security certification
Security certification
Signup and view all the flashcards
Common Criteria
Common Criteria
Signup and view all the flashcards
The vendor
The vendor
Signup and view all the flashcards
A vulnerability is found
A vulnerability is found
Signup and view all the flashcards
EMV chip
EMV chip
Signup and view all the flashcards
TEE
TEE
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- Introduction to Physical Attacks
- Presented by Ileana Buhan in March 2024 with Twitter handle @ileanabuhan
Physical Attacks
- Important considerations include why such attacks matter, identifying the adversary, and relevance to the industry.
- The agenda includes why physical assaults are important, the identity of adversaries, key vocabulary, and the industry perspective.
Why Protect Against Physical Attacks?
- Protect against Side Channel and Fault Injection attacks
- Side channel attacks involve recovering cryptographic keys, recovering Neural Network (NN) training data, and reverse engineering code.
- Fault Injection involves recovering cryptographic keys, modifying memory contents, modifying registers contents, and altering the sequence of executed instructions.
- Resilience against physical attacks is mandated in certain industries.
The Adversary - TOM
- Stands for Tamper, Observe, and Modify
- Tampering involves gaining hardware access, which might include proving the tamper resistance of the device.
- Observation includes identifying components and side channels.
- Modification encompasses reading restricted data and bypassing security checks.
Side-Channel Analysis Setups
- Typical power analysis setup includes an oscilloscope, target device, power supply, and current probe.
- Electromagnetic analysis setup includes Langer EM probe, target device, XYZ station, and Riscure EM probe.
Vocabulary
- Side channel evaluations include
- Unprofiled attacks with the goal to attack
- Profiled attacks with the goal to attack
- Leakage detection with the goal to evaluate
Software vs Hardware Implementation
- Software uses lines of code
- Hardware has physical circuitry
Power Signatures
- (SW) DES algorithm execution is the software implementation of the Data Encryption Standard algorithm
- (HW) DES algorithm execution is the hardware implementation of the Data Encryption Standard algorithm
EM (Electromagnetic) Scan
- Visual representation of a chip surface
Industry Perspective: Device Resilience
- Security Evaluations
- Motivation includes fulfilling requirements to sell a product, protect against future damage, gain a competitive edge, and ensure customer safety.
Security Certification
- Evidence that a product meets specified security requirements, regulating market access for payment systems, content protection, and government use.
- Standards are cost-effective due to the recognition of certifications, pre-defined security requirements, and evaluation methodologies.
- Industry, product type (IC, OS application), security requirements, and geographical location are all factors.
- Vendor liability.
Common Criteria (CC)
- Originally established in 1994 by France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK
- By 2022, certificate-authorizing members included Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Korea, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, and the USA.
- Certificate-consuming members include Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ethiopia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Indonesia, Israel, Pakistan, Poland, Qatar, Slovak Republic, and the UK.
- Separation of evaluator and certifier roles, with the vendor sponsoring the evaluation.
Objectives of CC evaluation
- Ensure high and consistent standards in IT product and protection profile evaluations, boosting confidence in their security.
- Improve the availability of evaluated, security-enhanced IT products and protection profiles.
- Eliminate duplicate evaluations of IT products and protection profiles and improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the evaluation and certification/validation process.
Certified CC products by category (end 2022)
- ICs, Smart Cards, and Smart Card-Related Devices had 1683
- Other leading categories included Other Devices and Systems (890) and Network and Network-Related Devices and Systems (721).
CC Certificates
- Publicly available
- Qualcomm Secure Processor Unit SPU250 is an example of a certificate.
- H1D3 Microcontroller with Crypto Library is an example of a certificate.
- Details about test effort by the evaluators (36 weeks):
- Characterization tests took 21.1% of the time
- Physical attacks accounted for 5.6%
- Perturbation attacks made up 12.2%
- Side-channel testing consumed 61.1%
- Logical tests used 0%.
CC Evaluations - Merits
- Consist of white-box evaluations
- Are attack based evaluation
- Recognized in multiple markets
- Uses vetted evaluation labs.
Criticisms of CC Evaluations
- Static certificates, valid for the Target of Evaluation (TOE)
- Require formal documentation.
- Expensive
Security Certification
- Can only be withdrawn if the certificate was created under misinformation; for example, wrong evidence was submitted.
EMV Chip (Europay Mastercard Visa)
- Initially published in 1996, consists of three key elements:
- Processing capability
- Secure storage of confidential information
- Cryptographic processing capability
- Secure composability is the keyword; chip, OS, and application
- Accreditation of labs
- Manufacturers are sponsors of the evaluation
- Certification bodies are private companies
Beyond EMV Chip
- Online payment world, the Chip and Pin are becoming obsolete
- Considerations include support for integrated payment methods, mobile payment, and secure storage of credentials.
- Technology evolves utilizing HCE and TEE
Conclusions
- Security certification regulates evaluation and testing in the security industry.
- Security certifications exist in complex eco-systems.
- Some schemes don't look at the security of the final product, just the development process.
- Challenges include the cost, technology shifts, and validity Impact of remote attacks is unclear White/grey-box Evaluation's Effectiveness The subjective nature of expert scoring of attacks
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.