Introduction to Justice Concepts
41 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What distinguishes relational egalitarianism from luck egalitarianism?

  • Luck egalitarianism emphasizes social equality in the distribution of resources.
  • Relational egalitarianism values social equality independent of justice. (correct)
  • Relational egalitarianism focuses solely on material wealth.
  • Luck egalitarianism prioritizes social relationships over distributive justice.
  • What is a key criticism of social inequality according to relational egalitarians?

  • It creates a society with unequal ranks and alienation. (correct)
  • It leads to a lack of distributive justice.
  • It results from a lack of material resources.
  • It is justified by brute luck considerations.
  • How do relational egalitarians justify the preference for one theory of justice over another?

  • By focusing primarily on the distribution of wealth.
  • By demonstrating that all inequalities stem from brute luck.
  • By emphasizing its ability to create or sustain a society of equals. (correct)
  • By insisting on complete equality of outcomes.
  • What paradoxical nature of luck egalitarianism is mentioned in the essay?

    <p>It relies on shares which can lead to luck-affected distributions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do theories of distributive justice generally focus on according to the content?

    <p>Ensuring that inequalities are justified and deserved.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key disagreement among philosophers and lawyers regarding corrective justice?

    <p>Whether compensation is required only for willful or negligent harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which type of justice guarantees a just outcome by following a specific procedure, according to John Rawls?

    <p>Perfect procedural justice</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does John Rawls describe pure procedural justice?

    <p>It acknowledges fairness through random selection without a way to evaluate the outcome.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might the justice of procedures not be reduced to the justice of outcomes?

    <p>Some procedures might be just even if the outcomes are unjust.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following illustrates the concept of perfect procedural justice?

    <p>A person cutting a cake and taking the last piece for themselves</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is implied by theories that are purely procedural in form?

    <p>They do not consider the outcomes at all.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What example does John Rawls use to explain perfect procedural justice?

    <p>Dividing a cake among peers</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the difference principle primarily focus on in terms of social and economic inequalities?

    <p>Arranging inequalities to benefit the least advantaged</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When applying the difference principle, what should comparisons be based on?

    <p>The effects of different social institutions</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement accurately reflects the nature of claims of justice?

    <p>Claims can depend on the kind of resources being allocated.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'holistic' or 'systemic' suggest about Rawls' approach to justice?

    <p>It considers the overall structure of institutions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Rawls suggest about the allocation of individual shares in extreme resource conditions?

    <p>Equitable distribution becomes irrelevant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How might the scope of justice differ between universal and contextual principles?

    <p>Universal principles apply in any interaction, while contextual ones depend on specific relationships.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What question is raised regarding the claims made in the context of justice?

    <p>Who is excluded from making claims of justice?</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In discussing the possible inclusion of non-human animals within principles of justice, which aspect is considered?

    <p>What characteristics they possess to justify inclusion</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes a principle of justice that is relevant only in specific contexts?

    <p>A principle that is relevant only in social or political relationships.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary assertion made by Rawls regarding animals and justice?

    <p>Justice principles do not apply to animals as they lack agency.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Hume's perspective on the relationship between humans and animals suggests what about our duties towards them?

    <p>We are bound to treat animals gently, but they are not entitled to justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which aspect does Rawls use to justify excluding animals from the concept of justice?

    <p>Humans have cooperative capabilities that animals lack.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Critics of Rawls' view argue that relationships between humans and animals can be cooperative. Which case do they predominantly reference?

    <p>The special case of dogs.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What potential criticism does the principle of cooperative practices face according to the content?

    <p>It could exclude certain vulnerable human groups from justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What reasoning is provided as to why animals might not claim justice from humans?

    <p>They exist outside the sphere of human social constructs.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what does the term 'asymmetries in relationships' refer to?

    <p>The unequal power dynamics between humans and animals.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What philosophical stance is presented against including animals within the scope of justice?

    <p>Justice applies only to rational agents engaged in cooperation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which feature of human existence is highlighted in the context of justice towards animals?

    <p>Humans possess moral agency.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a potential consequence of the argument regarding justice that excludes animals?

    <p>It risks creating a hierarchy of beings deserving of rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is meant by justice having a relational character?

    <p>Justice principles specifically relate to how individuals are treated within certain relationships.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is the inequality between two individuals, A and B, a concern of justice?

    <p>It raises questions if the inequality can be linked to an agent's actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are comparative principles of justice concerned with?

    <p>How individuals are treated relative to those with whom they have a connection.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the implications of relational justice?

    <p>It implies that global injustices can only be addressed through individual societal relations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does justice in its non-comparative guise differ from relational justice?

    <p>Non-comparative justice focuses on the broader society rather than individual relations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conclusion can be drawn if there is no agent attributed to inequality?

    <p>The concepts of justice and injustice become metaphorical.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main focus of relational theorists regarding justice?

    <p>They argue that associations between individuals create responsibilities of justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes global distributive justice from other forms of justice?

    <p>It examines treatment concerning global interactions and relationships.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which scenario exemplifies a relational principle of justice?

    <p>A community collaborates to reduce economic disparities among its members.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What issue arises from examining global inequalities as mere inequalities?

    <p>It undermines the necessity of agent attribution for justice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Introduction to Justice

    • Justice is a central concept in ethics, legal, and political philosophy.
    • It applies to individual actions, laws, and public policies.
    • Justice is often considered the most important virtue.
    • John Rawls described justice as the first virtue of social institutions.
    • Understanding the different forms and contexts of justice is crucial.

    Four Core Features Distinguishing Justice

    • Justice is distinguished from other moral and political ideas by four core features.
    • Conservative vs. Ideal Justice: Some conceptions of justice uphold existing norms, while others advocate for reform.
    • Corrective vs. Distributive Justice: Corrective justice addresses wrongdoing, while distributive justice concerns the allocation of goods.
    • Procedural vs. Substantive Justice: Procedural justice focuses on the methods of allocation, while substantive justice concerns the fairness of the outcome.
    • Comparative vs. Non-comparative Justice: Comparative justice requires considering the claims of others to determine what is due, while non-comparative justice determines the due based solely on the relevant facts of a person's situation

    Scope of Justice

    • Justice applies to individuals, institutions, and potentially non-human animals.
    • Justice applies in relationships and even in the absence of relationships if some agent is responsible.
    • The scope of justice may vary depending on the context.
    • Justice may apply differently to individuals and institutions.

    Justice and Individual Claims

    • Justice is concerned with treating individuals fairly, recognizing their claims.
    • Conflicts over claims about resources, opportunities, etc. can be resolved through appeal to justice.
    • In cases of abundance, justice may not be the primary concern.
    • Justice has different significance in personal and professional relationships..

    Justice: Charity and Enforceability

    • Justice entails obligation and enforceability.
    • Obligations of justice can be enforced, unlike charitable actions, which are voluntarily undertaken.
    • In some cases of extreme necessity, duties of humanity may override the requirements of justice.

    Justice and Impartiality

    • Justice demands impartial and consistent application of rules.
    • Justice contrasts with arbitrariness.
    • Justice is demonstrated through equal treatment of similar scenarios, with laws as an example.
    • Justice is necessary for fairness in all institutions and actions.

    Justice and Agency

    • Justice requires an agent or agents to be responsible for creating or changing circumstances.
    • Justice is applicable in situations where there are agents with responsibility and intention.
    • Justice is not applicable to circumstances or events that lack an agent.

    Conservative vs. Ideal Justice

    • Conservative justice upholds existing norms, whereas ideal justice seeks to reform norms and practices.

    Corrective vs. Distributive Justice

    • Corrective justice involves rectifying wrongs, whereas distributive justice concerns the allocation of goods or resources.

    Procedural vs Substantive Justice

    • Procedural justice focuses on the process of allocation, while substantive justice concerns the fairness of the outcome..

    Comparative vs. Non-comparative Justice

    • Comparative justice evaluates a person's due relative to the claims of others, whereas non-comparative justice relies on individual considerations.
    • Justice considerations can be either comparative or non-comparative..

    Human vs. Non-human Animals

    • The traditional view excludes non-human animals from the scope of justice, although this is increasingly being challenged.
    • Reasoning against such exclusion involves consideration of relationships and interests.
    • Whether or not animals are applicable to justice requires further considerations.

    Relational vs. Non-Relational Justice

    • Justice can be relational, focusing on relationships between parties, or non-relational, applying universally to all persons..

    Individuals vs. Institutions

    • Institutions play a role in distributing justice on a large scale, while individuals have their own duties to enact justice.
    • Individual actions and institutional policies can both impact and be impacted by considerations of justice.

    Recognition vs. Redistribution

    • Justice involves recognition and acknowledgment of individuals and groups, and fairness.
    • Justice requires valuing distinctive groups.

    Utilitarianism and Justice

    • Utilitarianism considers maximizing overall well-being as the criterion for justice.
    • Utilitarian theories encounter obstacles in accommodating intuitions about justice – focusing on the currency issue, and how it distributes well-being/happiness.
    • Criticisms include concerns about individual rights and deservingness, and non-consequential considerations of justice.

    Contractarianism and Justice

    • Contractarianism examines justice through hypothetical agreements among rational individuals.
    • Different versions of contractarianism exist, varying in their assumptions regarding individuals/agents and motivations.
    • The emphasis on agreements in contractarian theory can be challenging.

    Egalitarianism and Justice

    • Egalitarianism prioritizes equality, whether in treatment, outcome, or opportunity.
    • Justice is examined as it relates to different kinds of equality.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    This quiz explores the fundamental concepts of justice as presented in ethics, legal, and political philosophy. It emphasizes the distinguishing features of various forms of justice, including corrective, distributive, procedural, and substantive types. Understanding these differences is essential for grasping the role of justice in society.

    More Like This

    Legal Terms and Concepts
    5 questions
    Justice Concepts and Legal Rights
    28 questions
    Ultra Vires and Natural Justice Concepts
    26 questions

    Ultra Vires and Natural Justice Concepts

    BetterThanExpectedIrony9526 avatar
    BetterThanExpectedIrony9526
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser