International Law and Jus Cogens
84 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the significance of the 1986 Vienna Convention in relation to jus cogens?

The 1986 Vienna Convention contains provisions concerning jus cogens.

How did the International Court of Justice initially approach jus cogens in 1969, and how did its approach change by 1986?

In 1969, the ICJ did not embrace jus cogens in its legal analysis, but by 1986, it thoroughly embraced it and characterized the prohibition on the aggressive use of force as a 'conspicuous example of a rule in international law having the character of jus cogens'.

What is the relationship between jus cogens and State sovereignty, and how do they conflict?

There is a polarity between jus cogens and State sovereignty, as jus cogens implies that certain norms exist that no State may deviate from, while State sovereignty implies that States have the authority to do as they wish.

What is the origin of the concept of jus cogens, and what does it imply about the nature of international law?

<p>The concept of jus cogens originates from Natural Law, implying that certain norms exist independently of State consent and bind States regardless of their agreement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What would be the implication of a scenario where all States agree to allow torture as a police tactic, and how would this relate to jus cogens?

<p>In such a scenario, the approval of torture by the community of nations would potentially override any Natural Law or divinity-based norm against torture, highlighting the tension between jus cogens and State sovereignty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What has been the impact of the tension between jus cogens and State sovereignty on the development of international law?

<p>The tension between jus cogens and State sovereignty has impaired the hope of achieving widespread agreement on what norms constitute jus cogens.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary rationale for the current state of International Law, according to the Positivist School?

<p>Consent</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the predictable shift that occurred as the contemporary notion of 'State' developed its legal and political primacy?

<p>From Natural Law to Positivism</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the criticism of the Positivist School regarding its lack of a yardstick for judging the morality of State conduct?

<p>It would produce an enforceable obligation to wage aggressive wars</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the effect of Positivism on customary law, according to Professor T.W.Bennett?

<p>A long-lasting and generally maligning effect</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the position of the Eclectic School in relation to Natural Law and Positivism?

<p>A middle ground</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the basis of International Law, according to the Eclectic School?

<p>A serviceable blend of both naturalist's morality and positivist's common assent of sovereign nations</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the meaning of 'source' in the context of International Law, according to the text?

<p>Where a decision maker or researcher may look to ascertain the substantive content or applicable law</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), according to Article 38.1 of the Statute of the ICJ?

<p>To decide in accordance with international law such disputes as are submitted to it</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the sources of International Law, according to Article 38.1 of the Statute of the ICJ?

<p>International conventions, international custom, general principles of law recognized by civilized nations, and judicial decisions and teachings</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of Article 38.1 of the Statute of the ICJ in determining the sources of International Law?

<p>It provides a list of sources for ascertaining the content of International Law</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the criticism of Morton Kaplan and Nicholas Katzenbach regarding the list of sources of International Law?

<p>It failed to acknowledge their ever-changing nature.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the view of Chinese scholars regarding the sources of International Law listed in Article 38 of the ICJ Statute?

<p>They perceived these sources as reflecting the external policy of the ruling classes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the implicit hierarchy suggested by the sequential arrangement of sources within Article 38 of the ICJ Statute?

<p>Treaties, customs, and general principles as primary sources, and judicial decisions and scholarly writings as subsidiary sources.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the provision initially included in the draft of the predecessor of Article 38, but later deleted?

<p>The provision that the listed sources were to be considered en ordre successif - in successive order.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the ranking of sources according to University of Rome Professor Benedetto Conforti?

<p>Customary rules at the top, followed by treaties and then sources provided by agreements.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the principle that forms the basis of the obligatory character of treaties?

<p>Pacta sunt servanda (good faith performance).</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the criticism of the 'imperfect formulation' of Article 38 of the ICJ Statute by scholars from the former Soviet Union?

<p>The Article's list of sources was incomplete and did not accurately reflect the complexities of international law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the view of 'Third World' scholars regarding the sources of International Law?

<p>They saw the sources as reflecting the external policy of the ruling classes and having Eurocentric roots.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the example given to illustrate the possible conflict between a rule derived from a treaty and a rule derived from a customary practice?

<p>The treaty between Hitler and Stalin to divide Europe, conflicting with the customary rule against aggression.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the characterization of treaties by some commentators?

<p>As the most fundamental source of International Law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the relationship between treaties and customary law, according to Professor Rudolf Bernhardt?

<p>Treaties can supersede customary law, and states are free to conclude treaties that depart from customary law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the four elements for resolving whether a practice is Customary International Law (CIL), according to Professor Ian Brownlie?

<p>Duration or passage of time, substantial uniformity or consistency of usage, generality of the practice, and opinio juris et necessitatis.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf case in determining opinio juris?

<p>The case authoritatively analyzed the requisite international consensus for opinio juris to render a custom binding.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How do treaties change the legal relations between participating states, according to Professor Rudolf Bernhardt?

<p>Treaties impose additional and different obligations, limit existing freedom and sovereign rights, and change the applicable norms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of custom in determining international obligations when there are no treaties?

<p>Custom is a primary source for determining the content of International Law when there are no treaties.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of determining whether a particular practice is recognized as Customary International Law (CIL)?

<p>It is necessary to research the actual practice of states to determine whether enough of them expect the practice to be applied.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the most important and difficult element to authenticate in determining opinio juris, according to Professor Ian Brownlie?

<p>The fourth element, opinio juris et necessitatis, is the most important and difficult to authenticate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How do states feel about conforming to a legal obligation, according to the 1969 North Sea Continental Shelf case?

<p>States must feel that they are conforming to what amounts to a legal obligation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the relationship between treaties and regional customs, according to Professor Rudolf Bernhardt?

<p>Treaties can depart from customary law, and can change the legal relations between participating states.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of Customary International Law (CIL) in international relations?

<p>Customary International Law provides a rich and diverse source of international obligations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the complexity surrounding the determination of Customary International Law (CIL), according to Professor Grigori Tunkin?

<p>The complexity arises from the dual process of determining both where to find evidence of the custom's existence and when it becomes obligatory.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary purpose of the 'prize courts' in nations at war?

<p>To determine the lawfulness of military seizures of foreign vessels</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the vessel being a fishing smack, running in and out of Havana?

<p>It indicates the vessel's regular engagement in fishing on the coast of Cuba.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the outcome of the lower court's decision in this case?

<p>The seizure of the coastal fishing vessels was upheld.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the historical precedent for exempting coastal fishing vessels from capture as prize of war?

<p>An ancient usage among civilized nations, ripening into a rule of international law, recognizes coastal fishing vessels as exempt from capture.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's consideration of international law in this case?

<p>The Court traced the history of the rule exempting coastal fishers from capture to establish its final establishment in the United States and globally.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the nature of the cargo on the seized vessels?

<p>The cargo consisted of fresh fish, caught by the crew from the sea, put on board as they were caught, and kept and sold alive.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the blockading squadron in relation to the seized vessels?

<p>The blockading squadron stopped the vessel, leading to its capture and seizure.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of the master and crew members in relation to the vessel and its cargo?

<p>They had no interest in the vessel but were entitled to shares, amounting to two-thirds, of the catch.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the libel filed on April 27, 1898?

<p>It sought the condemnation of each vessel and her cargo as prize of war.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the basis for the court's decision regarding the seizure of the fishing vessels?

<p>The court was not satisfied that, as a matter of law, without any ordinance, treaty, or proclamation, fishing vessels of this class are exempt from seizure.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's discussion of the history of the custom exempting coastal fishers from capture?

<p>It establishes the rule's final establishment in the United States and globally.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of the highest prize court of the United States in relation to the law of nations?

<p>To declare and adjudge that the capture was unlawful and without probable cause.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the main point of contention between the majority and dissenting opinions in the Paquete Habana and Lola cases?

<p>The binding nature of the custom of exempting coastal fishers on the US and the degree of international recognition accorded to it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the implication of the President's ability to decide not to use international rules of war at any time?

<p>It suggests that the US is not bound by international rules of war and can act unilaterally.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the relationship between the law of nations and the capture of vessels in the Paquete Habana and Lola cases?

<p>The law of nations is used to determine the legality of the capture, and the highest prize court of the United States has the duty to administer this law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the consequence of the court's decision to reverse the decree of the District Court in the Paquete Habana and Lola cases?

<p>The proceeds of the sale of the vessel and its cargo will be restored to the claimant with damages and costs.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Paquete Habana and Lola cases in relation to the international law of war?

<p>They illustrate the tension between the international law of war and the power of the President to decide on its application.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the motivation behind many international acts in the field of ceremonial behaviour and protocol?

<p>considerations of courtesy, convenience, or tradition</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the difference between regional and universal customs?

<p>Regional customs are used by a few nations, while universal customs are practiced by many nations, and both can be binding.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a party prove in order to establish a regional custom as a source of International Law?

<p>That the custom is established in such a manner that it has become binding on the other party, and that it is in accordance with a constant and uniform usage.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the problem with the position that universality of practice is required for a custom to be binding under International Law?

<p>Universality is rarely achieved in an international system composed of many diverse nations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of practice in the evolution of International Law?

<p>Practice is substantive evidence of a general consensus or acceptable expectation, and it gradually evolves through compromise and consistency of application.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does dissent or change of consensus affect International Law norms?

<p>Dissent or change of consensus can indicate that a certain norm is not supported by universal consensus, and may bring about a new norm or revision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Paquete Habana and The Lola case?

<p>It illustrates how a group of decision makers determined whether a particular custom actually existed and was sufficiently acknowledged by the international community to be binding International Law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the relationship between custom and International Law?

<p>Custom is a source of International Law, and it evolves through compromise and consistency of application.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the importance of consistency of application in establishing a custom as International Law?

<p>Consistency of application is necessary to establish a custom as International Law, as it indicates a general consensus or acceptable expectation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the concept of custom reflect the nature of International Law?

<p>The concept of custom reflects the dynamic and evolving nature of International Law, which is shaped by the practice of States.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the principle behind the exemption of coast fishing vessels from capture as prize of war, as established by international law?

<p>Considerations of humanity to a poor and industrious order of men, and of the mutual convenience of belligerent states</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the 1806 and 1810 English orders in relation to the exemption of fishing vessels from capture?

<p>They favored fishing vessels employed in catching and bringing to market fresh fish, setting a precedent for future exemptions</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the Empire of Japan's 1894 ordinance relate to the exemption of coast fishing vessels from capture?

<p>It established prize courts and exempted 'boats engaged in coast fisheries' from detention, along with other vessels</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of jurists and commentators in determining international law, according to the text?

<p>Their works provide trustworthy evidence of what the law really is, rather than speculations about what it ought to be</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the US President's 1898 proclamation in relation to the conduct of war?

<p>It manifested the general policy of the government to conduct the war in accordance with the principles of international law sanctioned by recent practice</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the case involving The Paquete Habana and The Lola, according to the text?

<p>The two vessels and their cargoes were condemned by the district court as prize of war, and the vessels were sold under its decrees</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the basis of the exemption of coast fishing vessels from capture, according to the majority of the Court?

<p>The general custom against the capture of such vessels, as established by the practice of civilized nations</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the implication of the exemption of coast fishing vessels from capture, in terms of humanitarian considerations?

<p>It reflects a consideration of humanity to a poor and industrious order of men, ensuring their peaceful activities are protected</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the text characterize the rule of international law regarding the exemption of coast fishing vessels from capture?

<p>As an established rule, founded on considerations of humanity and mutual convenience, and sanctioned by the recent practice of civilized nations</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the review of precedents and authorities on the subject of the exemption of coast fishing vessels from capture?

<p>It abundantly demonstrates the established rule of international law, based on the general consent of civilized nations</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the source of the list of sources for determining International Law rules, as stated in Article 38 of the prior Statute?

<p>The list of sources was extracted from Article 38 of the prior Statute, unanimously adopted by the First Assembly of the League of Nations in 1920 for the original world court, the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ).</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the UN Secretary-General's comment in 1949 regarding the sources of International Law?

<p>The UN Secretary-General commented that the sources of International Law 'has been repeatedly treated as authoritative by international arbitral tribunals'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the American Law Institute's role in recommending sources of International Law in the United States?

<p>The American Law Institute has published a number of restatements of various fields of law, which is a blend of what is, and what should be, the law in a particular field.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the sources of International Law under $102 of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States?

<p>The sources of International Law under $102 of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States are customary law, international agreement, and general principles 'common to the major legal systems of the world'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of General Assembly resolutions in determining International Law, according to the Restatement and Article 38?

<p>General Assembly resolutions are 'secondary' evidence, analogous to the ICJ Article 38 term 'subsidiary' sources, and are not considered a direct indicator of the content of International Law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of examining the established sources of International Law in determining the applicable norm, according to the London Court of Appeal?

<p>The purpose is to see whether the particular rule, which some participant is advocating, has been consented to by States.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the criticism of Article 38, as stated in the 1944 Report of the Informal Inter-Allied Committee on the Future of the 'Permanent' Court of International Justice?

<p>The wording of Article 38 is open to certain criticisms, but it has worked well in practice and its retention is recommended.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the London Court of Appeal's pronouncement on the forensic process of determining International Law?

<p>The London Court of Appeal's pronouncement emphasizes the importance of taking judicial notice of international treaties and conventions, authoritative textbooks, practice and judicial decisions of other courts in other countries to determine International Law.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of international organizations in making International Law, according to Comment c to §103?

<p>International organizations have no authority to make law, and their determinations of what is law ordinarily have no special weight.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the American Law Institute's Restatement of International Law in the context of determining International Law?

<p>The American Law Institute's Restatement provides guidance on the sources of International Law, including customary law, international agreement, and general principles 'common to the major legal systems of the world'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Jus Cogens and Sovereignty

  • The concept of jus cogens refers to norms that are considered to be peremptory, meaning that they cannot be deviated from by any State
  • Jus cogens is derived from the Natural Law concept that certain norms exist, regardless of the consent of States
  • There is a tension between jus cogens and State sovereignty, as the former suggests that certain norms are absolute, while the latter implies that States have the authority to do as they wish

Positivist School

  • The Positivist School is a by-product of the Protestant Reformation
  • Positivists believe that consent is the essential rationale for the current state of International Law
  • International Law cannot exist independently of mutual consent, which is based on customary practice, treaties, or other expressions of national consent
  • Critics argue that the Positivist School lacks a yardstick for judging the morality of State conduct

Eclectic School

  • The Eclectic School occupies a middle ground between Natural Law and Positivism
  • Eclectics assert that International Law evolved through a periodic shifting of expedient emphases
  • International Law is a blend of both naturalist morality and positivist common assent of sovereign nations

Sources of International Law

  • The sources of International Law include:
    • International conventions
    • International custom
    • General principles of law recognized by civilized nations
    • Judicial decisions and the teachings of highly qualified publicists
  • The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has a list of sources that is similar to, but not identical to, the list used by other nations
  • The ICJ's list of sources is based on Article 38 of the Statute of the ICJ

Custom as a Source of International Law

  • Custom is a primary source of International Law
  • Custom is based on the practice of nations, which is accepted by many nations as a binding rule
  • Custom has a rich and diverse history dating back to Roman times
  • The existence of a custom is proved by:
    • Duration or passage of time
    • Substantial uniformity or consistency of usage by the affected nations
    • Generality of the practice, or degree of abstention
    • Opinio juris et necessitatis - international consensus about, and recognition of, the particular custom as binding

Regional and Universal Customs

  • Regional customs are used by a few nations and may differ from international customs practiced by many nations

  • Both regional and universal customs may be binding

  • A party that relies on a custom must prove that it is established in a manner that makes it binding on the other party### The Paquete Habana and The Lola Case

  • The case involves the seizure of two coastal fishing vessels, The Paquete Habana and The Lola, by the US Navy during the Spanish-American War of 1898.

  • The vessels were seized near the coast of Cuba, and the prize courts of the US Navy determined the lawfulness of the seizure based on presidential executive decrees regarding the Law of Prize.

  • The lower court's decision upheld the seizure of the vessels and their fishing cargoes, but the majority opinion of the Supreme Court surveyed how other nations answered such questions when the seizure allegedly violated the Law of Nations.

Facts of the Case

  • Each vessel was a fishing smack, running in and out of Havana, and regularly engaged in fishing on the coast of Cuba.
  • The vessels were owned by Spanish subjects of Cuban birth, living in the city of Havana, and commanded by subjects of Spain, also residing in Havana.
  • The master and crew had no interest in the vessel, but were entitled to shares of the catch, amounting to two-thirds, while the other third belonged to the owner.
  • The cargo consisted of fresh fish, caught by the crew from the sea, put on board as they were caught, and kept and sold alive.
  • The vessels had no knowledge of the existence of the war or of any blockade until stopped by the blockading squadron.

The Supreme Court's Decision

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the capture of the vessels was unlawful and without probable cause, citing the established rule of international law that coast fishing vessels, with their implements and supplies, cargoes and crews, unarmed and honestly pursuing their peaceful calling of catching and bringing in fresh fish, are exempt from capture as prize of war.
  • The Court traced the history of the custom allegedly exempting coastal fishers from capture, from King Henry IV's orders to his admirals in 1403 to the practices of France, Holland, Prussia, and the US.
  • The Court also cited the ordinance of the Empire of Japan in 1894, which established prize courts and exempted boats engaged in coast fisheries from detention.

International Law and Custom

  • International law is part of US law, and must be ascertained and administered by the courts of justice of appropriate jurisdiction.
  • In the absence of a treaty, controlling executive or legislative act, or judicial decision, resort must be had to the customs and usages of civilized nations.
  • The works of jurists and commentators are relied upon as evidence of these customs and usages.

The Dissenting Opinion

  • The dissenting opinion of three Supreme Court justices argued that the custom relied on by the majority was not binding on the US, and that the President could decide not to use the international rules of war at any time.
  • The dissenters did not believe that the custom of exempting coastal fishers had the degree of international recognition accorded to it by the majority.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

Test your knowledge of international law and jus cogens, a concept that regulates the use of force and treaties between states and international organizations. Learn about the provisions and legal analysis of jus cogens in the context of the UN Charter and the Vienna Convention.

More Like This

Jus Cogens and International Law Quiz
16 questions
International Law Norms
9 questions
Jus Cogens Norms Quiz
23 questions

Jus Cogens Norms Quiz

PeerlessMoldavite699 avatar
PeerlessMoldavite699
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser