Podcast
Questions and Answers
In the English language, how is the word 'science' different from other European languages?
In the English language, how is the word 'science' different from other European languages?
- It excludes history (correct)
- It includes history without hesitation
- It refers only to natural sciences
- It is not commonly used
What is the author's attitude towards the classification of history as a science?
What is the author's attitude towards the classification of history as a science?
- Critical
- Supportive
- Indifferent (correct)
- Uncertain
In the late 18th century, what question began to be asked about science and society?
In the late 18th century, what question began to be asked about science and society?
- Whether society should be separated from scientific study
- Whether science was irrelevant to societal progress
- Whether science could further man's knowledge of society (correct)
- Whether society influenced the development of science
What does the author imply about the terminological question regarding history and science?
What does the author imply about the terminological question regarding history and science?
How does the author feel about the issues raised by the classification of history as a science?
How does the author feel about the issues raised by the classification of history as a science?
What does the author imply about the classification of history as a science?
What does the author imply about the classification of history as a science?
What is the author's view on the terminological question regarding history and science?
What is the author's view on the terminological question regarding history and science?
What does the author suggest about the conception of social sciences and history?
What does the author suggest about the conception of social sciences and history?
What does the author imply about the English language's treatment of the word 'science'?
What does the author imply about the English language's treatment of the word 'science'?
What does the author imply about the issues raised by the classification of history as a science?
What does the author imply about the issues raised by the classification of history as a science?
