Intentional Torts: Trespass to Person
40 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What defines intentional torts in law?

  • Wrongs committed against persons, property, or goods with intent. (correct)
  • Wrongs that only involve physical harm.
  • Wrongs primarily based on negligence without intent.
  • Wrongs committed against passive injuries.
  • What must exist for an act to be considered trespass to a person?

  • A written consent from the plaintiff.
  • A negligent state of mind.
  • An intention at the time of the act. (correct)
  • Carelessness on the part of the defendant.
  • Which of the following elements is NOT a general element of trespass?

  • A positive act.
  • Intent on the part of the defendant.
  • The absence of injury. (correct)
  • Harm to a person's integrity.
  • What does trespass to property primarily protect?

    <p>The right to own and enjoy possessions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How is the intention significant in cases of trespass?

    <p>It determines if the act is classified as trespass or negligence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary purpose of intentional torts?

    <p>To protect the interests and rights of individuals.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is an example of a situation that constitutes trespass to a person?

    <p>A person touches another without permission.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of intentional torts, what distinguishes trespass from negligence?

    <p>The element of intent in the defendant's actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the modern definition of assault?

    <p>Intentionally and directly causing a person to apprehend an imminent application of force.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT an element necessary to establish an assault?

    <p>The plaintiff's previous experiences with violence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of battery, what does 'without consent' imply?

    <p>The plaintiff did not give any form of agreement to the action.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What aspect is critical for establishing that a threat is considered an assault?

    <p>The plaintiff must feel threatened by the defendant's capability to act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements about battery is true?

    <p>Battery can occur through mere touching without any intent to harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case affirmed that abusive words followed by physical harm can establish an assault?

    <p>Shalini Shanmugam &amp; anor v Marni Anyim</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a result of the principle established in Thomas v National Union of Mineworkers?

    <p>Impossible threats cannot constitute assault due to lack of apprehension.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What behavior does Innes v Wylie illustrate regarding assault?

    <p>Active intervention is necessary for assault.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the doctrine of transferred intent primarily allow?

    <p>The defendant to be liable for intentionally tortious acts against an unintentional victim.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is necessary for contact to be considered a battery?

    <p>There must be an application of unwanted force.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case highlights the significance of voluntary and controlled actions in tort liability?

    <p>Gibbons v Pepper</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which situation would transferred intent NOT be applicable?

    <p>If the contact was made in a non-hostile manner.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements about consent in battery law is true?

    <p>No contact is allowed without consent or lawful justification.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required to establish hostile touching in a battery case?

    <p>The defendant must be aware that the plaintiff objects to the contact.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best compares assault and battery?

    <p>Assault is based on apprehension, whereas battery is based on physical contact.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does medical treatment relate to the concept of battery?

    <p>Medical treatment without consent is considered battery.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be true about the defendant's mental state in cases of false imprisonment?

    <p>It must be intentional in order to impose restraint.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which scenario illustrates a complete restraint for the purposes of false imprisonment?

    <p>A security guard prevents a shopper from leaving a store without evidence of theft.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of false imprisonment, under what condition may a plaintiff not claim false imprisonment?

    <p>If they could escape safely.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Who may legally impose restraint without liability for false imprisonment?

    <p>A police officer acting on reasonable suspicion.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a necessary component to establish the tort of false imprisonment?

    <p>The plaintiff's freedom must have been completely restricted.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the principles established, which of the following cases emphasizes that false imprisonment cannot occur through negligence?

    <p>W Elphinstone v Lee Leng San</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following can be identified as a direct consequence of the defendant's act in false imprisonment?

    <p>The physical barriers set up by the defendant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following cases re-emphasizes that a plaintiff's awareness of confinement is not essential to establish false imprisonment?

    <p>Meering v Graham-White Aviation</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of harm does Wilkinson v Downton address?

    <p>Intentional indirect harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT one of the four elements required to prove the tort in Wilkinson v Downton?

    <p>The act must involve physical contact</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Janvier v Sweeney, what was the basis for the defendant's liability?

    <p>Proving the allegations against the plaintiff</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the outcome for the plaintiff in the harassment case involving Khorasandjian v Bush?

    <p>The plaintiff was granted an injunction for protection</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a significant characteristic of intentional harm discussed in these cases?

    <p>The harm must be foreseeable and intentional</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement accurately reflects the ruling in Wilkinson v Downton?

    <p>Outrageous conduct can lead to recovery for distress</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What common factor is illustrated through the cases mentioned in the content regarding intentional harm?

    <p>Mental suffering or distress was a key consideration</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the example of the practical joke in Wilkinson v Downton, what was the main effect of the defendant's actions on the plaintiff?

    <p>Nervous shock resulting in physical incapacity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Intentional Torts: Trespass to Person

    • Intentional torts are wrongs committed against persons, property, or goods requiring a level of intent or knowledge.
    • Historically, legal actions began with "writs." Early law used "trespass" as the primary tort concept, encompassing all types of breaches of the king's peace.
    • Over time, a separation emerged between injuries caused directly (intentionally) and those caused carelessly (negligently).
    • Modern law distinguishes between intentional torts (e.g., trespass to person) and negligence.
    • Intentional torts require an intentional state of mind by the defendant, aiming to cause a specific result.
    • These torts can involve physical harm to a person or their property.
    • Trespass to person includes assault, battery, and false imprisonment.
    • A further intentional tort, Wilkinson v Downton, regarding intentional physical harm which is separate from the trespass to person is also covered.
    • The key element in these intentional torts is the defendant's mental state (intent).
    • Letang v Cooper (1965): Intent must exist during the defendant's act. If the defendant acted negligently, the case falls under negligence, not trespass.

    Types of Trespass to Person

    • Assault: involves creating an apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact.
    • Battery: involves the actual harmful or offensive contact.
    • False Imprisonment: involves unlawful confinement of a person.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the concept of intentional torts, focusing specifically on trespass to person. It covers various forms such as assault, battery, and false imprisonment, and distinguishes between intentional torts and negligence. Understanding these elements is crucial for grasping the legal framework surrounding personal injuries.

    More Like This

    Intentional Torts - Types and Elements
    6 questions
    Law Chapter 4: Intentional Torts
    11 questions
    Intentional Tort: Interference with Goods
    24 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser