Intentional Torts and Assault
41 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the purpose of industry custom in a negligence case?

  • It is determinative in all cases.
  • It sets the standard of care.
  • It eliminates the need for proving negligence.
  • It can be offered as evidence of blameworthiness or lack thereof. (correct)
  • Personal custom can establish a duty of care in negligence cases.

    False

    What are the four elements required to establish Res Ipsa Loquitur?

    1. Nature of accident suggests negligence, 2) D had exclusive control, 3) P lacks direct evidence, 4) Instrumentality unlikely to cause harm without negligence.

    To prove causation, one must establish _____ causation, _____ causation, and check for _____ causes.

    <p>but-for, proximate, superseding</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following terms with their definitions:

    <p>Recklessness = Extreme degree of risk with subjective awareness Causation = Establishing a link between the defendant's actions and the injury Res Ipsa Loquitur = Injury that suggests negligence without direct evidence Superseding Cause = An event that relieves the defendant of liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What standard of care applies to a child aged 7 in Illinois?

    <p>No negligence if younger than 7</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A reasonable child is held to the same standard of care as an adult in all situations.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What three conditions must be met for the sudden emergency doctrine to apply?

    <ol> <li>Actor wasn't negligent prior, 2) Emergency arises suddenly, 3) Reaction is spontaneous and unreflective</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

    In cases of mental disability, courts weigh the relationship between the parties, foreseeability of harm, and _____ when determining duty of care.

    <p>Public Policy</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the age thresholds to the corresponding negligence rules:

    <p>Under 5 = No negligence Under 7 = No negligence if younger 7 years old = Reasonable child standard Over 7 = Same as an adult</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the key consideration of the emergency doctrine?

    <p>Emergency arises suddenly and unexpectedly</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Individuals with mental disabilities are generally held to a lower standard of care than those without mental disabilities.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must a rescuer prove when they undertake a rescue?

    <p>Causation and proximate cause</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Firefighter Rule allows police and firefighters to recover for injuries suffered while performing their duties.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary duty of healthcare workers when a patient poses a threat to others?

    <p>To warn of potential harm to identifiable third parties</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The __________ rule bars recovery for injuries suffered by police and firefighters while performing their duties.

    <p>Firefighter</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following concepts with their definitions:

    <p>Causation = The link between an action and the resulting effect Proximate Cause = The direct cause that results in an injury Duty to Warn = Obligation to inform others about potential harm Emergency Response = Reacting to an unforeseen critical situation</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a condition for a healthcare worker's duty to warn?

    <p>The patient initiated harm themselves</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Healthcare workers are required to warn third parties only if the threat is non-specific.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstances must a healthcare professional warn immediate family members of a patient's condition?

    <p>When there is a special relationship, the professional knew or should have known of the disease, and an identifiable third person is at risk.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    To fulfill the duty to warn, threats must be communicated to a __________ professional.

    <p>mental health</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following factors is NOT considered under the Dillon Rule?

    <p>Economic proximity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Only economic losses can be claimed under the Dillon Rule.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for a plaintiff to recover under the Dillon Rule in terms of injury?

    <p>Serious bodily injury or death</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under the Dillon Rule, a plaintiff must observe the event as it happens for it to be considered _____ proximity.

    <p>temporal</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the factors of the Dillon Rule with their definitions:

    <p>Physical proximity = Plaintiff is physically close when the harm occurs Familial proximity = Plaintiff is close family with the injured party Temporal proximity = Plaintiff observes the event as it happens</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must plaintiffs demonstrate when claiming economic loss?

    <p>Property damage must also occur</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Mere economic harm allows for recovery under the Dillon Rule.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of relationship needs to exist for a duty to be owed directly to an individual?

    <p>Special relationship</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Dillon Rule, the immediate family must be related by _____ or marriage.

    <p>blood</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the policy reason for preventing individuals from becoming insurers of others?

    <p>To prevent unfair outcomes</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary consideration for the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine?

    <p>Duty to avoid negligence towards children</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A swimming pool is always considered an attractive nuisance under the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the duty of care that a landowner owes to a licensee?

    <p>Duty to warn about dangerous conditions or to make them safe.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Children may not realize the risk created by an ______ condition.

    <p>artificial</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the type of entrant with their corresponding duty of care.

    <p>Children = Avoid negligence Licensee = Reasonable care to warn Invitee = Reasonable standard of care Trespasser = No duty except gross negligence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine?

    <p>Condition is beneficial to the landowner</p> Signup and view all the answers

    An invitee enters a premises for mutual benefit.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are the two types of dangerous conditions that a landowner must manage with respect to invitees?

    <p>Dangerous activities and dangerous conditions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A ______ can enter a property with the owner's knowledge and consent for their own convenience.

    <p>licensee</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of these best describes the knowledge requirement for the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine?

    <p>D must have actual or constructive knowledge of the condition's potential to attract children</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Intentional Torts

    • Intentional torts require intent
    • Battery occurs when a party intentionally causes harmful or offensive contact.
      • One type of intent is purpose.
      • The other intent is substantial certainty that contact will occur.
      • Single intent jurisdictions focus on intended contact, while dual intent jurisdictions also require the defendant understanding the contact to be harmful or offensive.
    • To cause harm, there needs to be a harmful or offensive contact.
      • Harmful contact results in physical injury, pain, or illness.
      • Offensive contact violates a reasonable person's sense of dignity.
    • Contact may be direct or indirect.
    • Causation means the defendant's act caused the harmful or offensive contact.

    Assault

    • Assault occurs when a party intentionally causes imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact
    • Party must be aware of the potential for the harmful contact
    • Must have the intent
    • Needs to be an imminent apprehension of harm
    • Apprehension is not necessarily fear but awareness of an immediate threat
    • Has to be a reasonable apprehension

    False Imprisonment

    • False imprisonment occurs when a party intends to confine another
    • The confinement happens directly or indirectly
    • The person must be conscious of the confinement or have been harmed by it

    Trespass to Land

    • A trespass to land occurs when someone interferes with the right of exclusive possession of a landowner
    • Without permission
    • Intentional act

    Trespass to Chattels

    • Intentional impairment of chattel's condition
    • Intentional deprivation of the chattel for an extended time
    • Bodily harm done to the chattel
    • Key fact: harmful interference involves an impairment in chattel's condition while harmless intereference involves only a deprivation of possession.

    Conversion

    • Intentional exercise of dominion or control over a chattel.
    • Interference with the right to control is serious, and compensation might be necessary.

    Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)

    • Intentional or reckless outrageous conduct
    • Causation
    • Requires severe emotional distress
    • Key factor: conduct must go beyond all bounds of decency
    • Factors considered: conduct's intensity, duration, relationship between parties, and awareness of vulnerability.

    Defenses to Intentional Torts

    • Consent: express or implied consent to conduct.
    • Necessity: actions justified by emergencies to avoid greater harm
    • Defense of self, others, or property: using reasonable force to prevent imminent harm

    Negligence

    • Duty: a legal obligation to act carefully, the reasonable person standard applies.
    • Breach: failure to meet the duty of care; the reasonable person standard applies, and this means determining what a reasonable person would do under those circumstances, based on both constructive and actual knowledge.
    • Causation: the breach of care must have caused the harm, this includes but-for causation, proximate cause and superseding causes
    • Damages: proof of harm suffered is required

    Special Duties to Act

    • Good Samaritan Statutes: laws that can immunize people who help from liability (if acted in good faith).
    • Professionals: duty to act may depend on their position (e.g. doctor, lawyer)
    • Special relationships: duty to act when a special relationship exists (e.g. employer and employee, teacher and student), and also for specific individuals like a child being in danger.

    Limitations on Duty

    • Emergency situations might limit the duty owed if the emergency is very sudden and without warning.
    • Physical disabilities might limit the duty owed if the person has a disability, and they are reasonable (ex. blind person needing a guide dog)
    • Children: children will be subjected to the reasonable person standard for their age
    • Mental disabilities: people with mental disabilities have the same duty of care as those without; however, courts may consider the extent to which they can understand their surroundings

    Defenses to Negligence

    • Contributory negligence (rarely used anymore).
    • Comparative negligence (modifies the amount of damages based on the plaintiff's contribution to the harm).
    • Assumption of risk (knowing and accepting a risk)
    • Secondary assumption: voluntary encounter with risk (e.g., sports).
    • Primary assumption: inherent risks (e.g., certain activities)

    Special Liability Rules

    • Business owners: have a duty to keep premises safe for visitors (invitees, licensees, and trespassers)
    • Duty to warn of dangerous conditions and reasonable care

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    This quiz covers the key concepts of intentional torts, focusing on battery and assault. Understand the elements of intent, harmful contact, and the distinctions between single and dual intent jurisdictions. Test your knowledge on how these torts apply in legal contexts.

    More Like This

    Intentional Torts - Types and Elements
    6 questions
    Assault/Battery/Ethical Principles
    10 questions
    Intentional Torts Quiz
    40 questions

    Intentional Torts Quiz

    AccessibleBlankVerse avatar
    AccessibleBlankVerse
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser