10 Questions
What is a major difference between German and U.S. law regarding the insolvency of a company?
In Germany, insolvency is perceived as a disgrace rather than an opportunity.
How does German law perceive the insolvency of a company?
As a shameful occurrence.
What is a reason why directors are reluctant to comply with the obligation to file for insolvency in Germany?
They fear the negative stigma associated with insolvency.
How does the German law rely on directors in terms of insolvency procedures?
Directors are obligated to file for insolvency promptly.
What impact has the perception of insolvency had on the legislation in Germany?
The legislation lacks an appropriate framework for rescue procedures.
What loophole allowed operators to bypass the obligation to file for insolvency in Germany?
"A positive forecast could override the obligation".
Why were the obligations for directors to file for insolvency weakened according to the text?
"To enable operators to evade filing for insolvency by providing a positive outlook".
How does German law differ from U.S. law regarding the responsibility of creditors during insolvency?
"Creditors play a more active role in initiating insolvency proceedings in Germany".
"What cultural aspect contributes to the difficulties faced by insolvent companies in Germany?"
"The absence of a positive bankruptcy culture"
"Why do many insolvent companies struggle with recovery in Germany according to the text?"
"Operators often avoid admitting insolvency due to stigma"
Explore the fiduciary duties related to insolvency, such as the obligation for directors to file for insolvency within a specified timeframe. Learn about the strict requirements and limitations on discreet rescue measures according to the insolvency law.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
