22 Questions
What do the experiments discussed in the text demonstrate about category structure?
It is context dependent
What did Heit & Rubenstein (1994) find when the predicate was biological?
Induction was stronger for biologically similar animals
What did the experiments reveal about similarity in context?
Similarity is context dependent
What is one limitation of the paradigm discussed in the text?
It always provides clear underlying similarity ratings
What did the experiments reveal about induction when the predicate was biological?
Induction was stronger for biologically similar predicates
What did Heit & Rubenstein (1994) construct in their experiments?
Arguments about biological and non-biological predicates
What did the experiments reveal about the relationship between similarity and category structure?
Similarity underlies category structure
What did the experiments reveal about the dependency of similarity?
It is context dependent
What did the experiments reveal about induction for biologically similar animals?
Induction was stronger
What did the experiments reveal about featural overlap and similarity ratings?
They are context dependent
What is a key finding from the experiments about induction and biological predicates?
Induction was stronger for biologically similar animals
What did the experiments reveal about the relationship between category structure and similarity?
Similarity underlies category structure
What did Lin & Murphy find regarding induction for thematically related categories?
Induction was stronger for thematically related categories
What did Lin & Murphy's study suggest about the reliance on deeper knowledge in induction?
Induction was stronger for low similarity pairs, suggesting reliance on deeper knowledge
What did Voorspoels et. al demonstrate about the source of information in relation to inductive reasoning?
The source of information affects the likelihood of extending from premise to conclusion
What did studies on inductive generalization show about the extension based on expert or random source beliefs?
Studies showed varied extension based on expert or random source beliefs
What did the example of size and categorization as a pizza demonstrate about higher-order knowledge?
Higher-order knowledge affects categorization; the example of size and categorization as a pizza demonstrates this
What did Lin & Murphy (1997) study show about participants' willingness to accept an object as a tuk?
Participants' willingness to accept an object as a tuk depended on its condition and missing feature
What influences categorization decisions according to the provided information?
Categorization decisions are not solely based on similarity, participants draw on higher-order knowledge
What did the studies on real-world category features demonstrate about their influence on category learning?
Real-world category features have meaningful associations that influence category learning
What did the participants' learning of integrated categories faster than neutral ones indicate?
The influence of higher-order knowledge
What do word association studies capture according to the provided information?
Similarity relationships and deeper associations between items
Study Notes
Inductive Reasoning and Knowledge Effects in Categorization
- Lin & Murphy (2001) found stronger induction for thematically related categories than similar ones in specific situations.
- Induction was stronger for low similarity pairs, suggesting reliance on deeper knowledge, not just similarity structure.
- Predicates aren't entirely blank, real-world properties contain structured information.
- The reversal of premise monotonicity in Heusen et. al experiments can be explained by higher-order knowledge effects.
- Voorspoels et. al demonstrated that the source of information affects the likelihood of extending from premise to conclusion.
- Studies on inductive generalization showed varied extension based on expert or random source beliefs.
- Higher-order knowledge affects categorization; the example of size and categorization as a pizza demonstrates this.
- Lin & Murphy (1997) study showed participants' willingness to accept an object as a tuk depended on its condition and missing feature.
- Categorization decisions are not solely based on similarity, participants draw on higher-order knowledge.
- Real-world category features have meaningful associations that influence category learning.
- Participants learned integrated categories faster than neutral ones, indicating the influence of higher-order knowledge.
- Word association studies capture similarity relationships and deeper associations between items.
Test your understanding of inductive reasoning and knowledge effects in categorization with this quiz. Explore the influence of higher-order knowledge on categorization decisions and the impact of real-world category features on learning. Dive into studies demonstrating varied extension based on expert or random source beliefs and the role of deeper associations in word association studies.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
