Impossible Crime and Actus Reus in Criminal Law
11 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the main focus of the text?

  • The importance of intent in criminal law
  • The concept of impossible crimes (correct)
  • The French legal system and its history
  • The distinction between actus reus and mens rea

What is the key difference between actus reus and mens rea in criminal law?

  • Actus reus refers to the intended result, while mens rea refers to the unintended consequences.
  • Actus reus refers to the external factors, while mens rea refers to the internal factors.
  • Actus reus refers to the physical act, while mens rea refers to the mental state. (correct)
  • Actus reus refers to the legal consequences, while mens rea refers to the moral culpability.

In the Perdero case, what was the key issue regarding criminal culpability?

  • Whether the subsequent assault on the corpse was a crime
  • Whether the initial assault was justified
  • Whether the intended result of the initial assault was impossible (correct)
  • Whether the victim was already dead during the subsequent assault

What was the importance of intent in determining criminal culpability in the Padreau case?

<p>Intent was considered alongside the physical act in determining culpability. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the key issue in the Pre d'Oro case mentioned in the text?

<p>The blurred lines between intention, act, and outcome (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the Perderot decision?

<p>The defendant was convicted of attempted murder. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why did the French court convict the defendant for attempted murder despite the victim already being deceased?

<p>Due to the defendant's belief that the victim was alive during the crime. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the Perderot decision impact future legal cases?

<p>It set a precedent that intent could be punished even if the desired outcome was impossible. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was one argument in favor of the Perderot decision?

<p>It could potentially deter individuals from committing harmful actions. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How might the Perderot decision influence future legal cases internationally?

<p>It could set a standard that intent can be punished even without actual crime commission. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Perderot case emphasize about culpability based on intent and action?

<p>'Mens rea' and 'actus reus' must both be present for culpability. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Like This

Impossible Cloud Features Overview
18 questions
Kai Wawrzinek and Impossible Cloud Startup
12 questions
Impossible Quiz Flashcards
51 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser