Podcast
Questions and Answers
What rationale justifies the exclusion of evidence that results from the infringement of an individual's rights?
What rationale justifies the exclusion of evidence that results from the infringement of an individual's rights?
Which rationale indicates that evidence should be excluded if its procurement process renders it unreliable?
Which rationale indicates that evidence should be excluded if its procurement process renders it unreliable?
What does the fair trial rationale emphasize in the context of evidence exclusion?
What does the fair trial rationale emphasize in the context of evidence exclusion?
What is the primary goal of the deterrence rationale regarding the actions of law enforcement?
What is the primary goal of the deterrence rationale regarding the actions of law enforcement?
Signup and view all the answers
Under the rights protection rationale, what is necessary for ensuring the accused is not disadvantaged?
Under the rights protection rationale, what is necessary for ensuring the accused is not disadvantaged?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following actions would likely be considered a violation leading to the exclusion of evidence?
Which of the following actions would likely be considered a violation leading to the exclusion of evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the phrase 'circumvents and undermines the accused person's right' refer to?
What does the phrase 'circumvents and undermines the accused person's right' refer to?
Signup and view all the answers
What can be inferred about evidence obtained through entrapment based on the content provided?
What can be inferred about evidence obtained through entrapment based on the content provided?
Signup and view all the answers
What defines illegally obtained evidence?
What defines illegally obtained evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
According to the traditional position at common law, how is the relevance of evidence determined?
According to the traditional position at common law, how is the relevance of evidence determined?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a primary argument for the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence?
What is a primary argument for the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
What exception exists to the traditional rule regarding the admissibility of evidence?
What exception exists to the traditional rule regarding the admissibility of evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following best illustrates the principle stated in 'Kuruma S/O Kaniu v R' regarding evidence obtained improperly?
Which of the following best illustrates the principle stated in 'Kuruma S/O Kaniu v R' regarding evidence obtained improperly?
Signup and view all the answers
What common misconception might someone have regarding the admission of evidence gained through illegal channels?
What common misconception might someone have regarding the admission of evidence gained through illegal channels?
Signup and view all the answers
In which situation can the admission of illegally obtained evidence lead to criticism of the judicial system?
In which situation can the admission of illegally obtained evidence lead to criticism of the judicial system?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the case 'R v Sang' indicate about the role of judges regarding improperly obtained evidence?
What does the case 'R v Sang' indicate about the role of judges regarding improperly obtained evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary focus of the judicial integrity rationale?
What is the primary focus of the judicial integrity rationale?
Signup and view all the answers
Under which rationale is evidence excluded to prevent rewarding police misconduct?
Under which rationale is evidence excluded to prevent rewarding police misconduct?
Signup and view all the answers
The compensation rationale holds that rights have value and breaches can be remedied through what?
The compensation rationale holds that rights have value and breaches can be remedied through what?
Signup and view all the answers
Which article of the CoK pertains to the exclusion of tainted evidence?
Which article of the CoK pertains to the exclusion of tainted evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the doctrine of legal guilt emphasize regarding criminal charges?
What does the doctrine of legal guilt emphasize regarding criminal charges?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a significant argument in favor of admissibility of illegally obtained evidence?
What is a significant argument in favor of admissibility of illegally obtained evidence?
Signup and view all the answers
Which rationale emphasizes that the justice system must not reward violations of law?
Which rationale emphasizes that the justice system must not reward violations of law?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the constitutional duty rationale require when considering evidence exclusion?
What does the constitutional duty rationale require when considering evidence exclusion?
Signup and view all the answers
What does Article 50 (4) of the CoK 2010 specify regarding evidence obtained through violations of rights?
What does Article 50 (4) of the CoK 2010 specify regarding evidence obtained through violations of rights?
Signup and view all the answers
In assessing whether tainted evidence renders a trial unfair, what perspective should be primarily considered in criminal cases?
In assessing whether tainted evidence renders a trial unfair, what perspective should be primarily considered in criminal cases?
Signup and view all the answers
What is one of the considerations for determining if the admission of tainted evidence is detrimental to justice?
What is one of the considerations for determining if the admission of tainted evidence is detrimental to justice?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is the exclusion of evidence considered an inefficient remedy?
Why is the exclusion of evidence considered an inefficient remedy?
Signup and view all the answers
Which factor does NOT affect the determination of whether tainted evidence can render a trial unfair?
Which factor does NOT affect the determination of whether tainted evidence can render a trial unfair?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the reasoning behind admitting tainted evidence when it comes from private individuals?
What is the reasoning behind admitting tainted evidence when it comes from private individuals?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of civil cases, which principle takes precedence over the pursuit of truth?
In the context of civil cases, which principle takes precedence over the pursuit of truth?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is a reason why the pursuit of truth should not be sacrificed in judicial proceedings?
Which of the following is a reason why the pursuit of truth should not be sacrificed in judicial proceedings?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Illegally Obtained Evidence
- Evidence obtained illegally (e.g., by a crime, tort, or violating constitutional/statutory provisions) or unfairly (e.g., trickery, deception, threats).
- Two divergent views exist regarding the admissibility of such evidence.
- One view argues that relevant evidence should be admitted, regardless of how it was obtained.
- The opposing view maintains that illegally obtained evidence should be excluded, even if it might lead to an injustice in a specific case. This ensures that the judicial system doesn't benefit from its own wrongdoing.
Divergent Thoughts on Illegally Obtained Evidence
- For: Relevant and admissible evidence should not be excluded simply because of the method used to obtain it, as doing so can lead to injustice (e.g., acquittal of a guilty person).
- Against: Illegally obtained evidence should always be excluded, even if it leads to an injustice in a specific case, as admission of such evidence can damage the integrity of the justice system.
Traditional Position at Common Law
- R v Leatham (1861): The method of obtaining evidence doesn't affect its admissibility—if evidence is relevant, it's admissible, even if obtained through theft.
- Kuruma S/O Kaniu v R [1955]: The test for admissibility is relevance; if relevant, the evidence is admissible, regardless of the method of acquisition.
Traditional Position at Common Law (R v Sang [1980])
- Courts are not concerned with how the evidence was obtained, but rather how it was used by the prosecution.
- Discretion to exclude evidence only exists in limited circumstances (e.g., confessions obtained after committing a crime).
- Entrapment is not a valid defense in English law.
Exceptions to the Traditional Rule (Common Law Rule)
- Evidence obtained by torture: Such evidence is usually inadmissible as a matter of constitutional principle, regardless of where or by whom it was obtained.
- Improperly obtained confessions: These are often inadmissible for various reasons, potentially including breaches of rights.
- Theft of privileged documents in courts: This can lead to dismissal of those documents as evidence.
Examples of Illegal Means of Obtaining Evidence
- Torture
- Covert recording and filming
- Unwarranted searches of premesis
- Entrapment (a specific instance involving entrapment case)
Rationales for Excluding Illegally Obtained Evidence
- Rights Protection: The protection of rights is intertwined with the exclusion of evidence; an infringement on an individual's right serves as justification for evidence exclusion.
- The exclusion of evidence is important, ensuring the violation of a party’s rights in obtaining evidence is rectified.
- A breach of rights is compensated by excluding illegally obtained evidence.
Fair Trial Rationale
- Evidence exclusion is essential to ensure a fair trial. This involves evaluating the fairness of the entire proceedings, including evidence procurement. The state cannot benefit from its own wrongdoing. The procurement of evidence obtained in violation of rights renders the trial unfair.
- The relevant term in this context refers to the entire process from investigation to trial conclusion.
Reliability Rationale
-
Also known as the unreliability principle. Evidence should be excluded when its reliability is compromised, or the accused's ability to evaluate its reliability is impaired.
-
Evidence is excluded if its manner of procurement renders it unreliable—to the point of being unworthy of consideration.
Deterrence Rationale
- Exclusion of illegally obtained evidence is a way to deter misconduct by police and other investigative authorities. The goal is future prevention of misconduct, not to fix past mistakes.
Judicial Integrity Rationale
- Exclusion of illegally obtained evidence is necessary for upholding the integrity, and legitimacy of the justice system. When the justice system punishes wrongdoings by one party, while rewarding wrongdoings by a second party (in this case, an officer), the integrity is impugned.
Compensation Rationale
- Violating someone's rights is a wrong to be remedied.
- Exclusion of the illegally gathered evidence compensates the party whose rights were infringed.
- The aim is to place the situation back to where it should have been, had the rights violation not occurred.
Constitutional Duty (regarding exclusion of evidence)
- Exclusion of evidence may be based on common law, statutory, or constitutional provisions.
- Constitutional provisions provide binding duties on courts.
- Article 50(4) of the Kenyan Constitution imposes special and obligatory duties upon courts in regards to illegally obtained evidence.
Doctrine of Legal Guilt
- An accused person should not be held guilty based solely on probable evidence.
- Guilt hinges on procedurally appropriate acquisition of evidence.
Arguments in Favor of Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence
- Public safety: Excluding such evidence might allow dangerous criminals to escape justice.
- Proportionality: Excluding evidence may be excessive for minor violations.
- Efficiency: Excluding evidence can be inefficient, due to the cost of excluding evidence versus the potential value it may present (potential dangers of not examining such evidence).
- Epistemic: The quest for truth should not be undermined to uphold rules.
Current Position - Kenya
- Article 50(4) of the Kenyan Constitution prohibits the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of fundamental rights or freedoms, if the use of such evidence would render the trial unfair.
Considerations in Determining Trial Unfairness
- Whether: Tainted evidence impacts the trial’s fairness, due to manner of obtaining, or its impact on the proceeding(s).
- Perspective: Fairness is judged from individual or multiple perspectives.
- Rights Violations: Violation of other parties’ rights is used to assess whether a trial is fair.
- Admission of Tainted Evidence: Evidence acquired from third parties, in a manner that violates rights, should be excluded. If such evidence would lead to an unjust trial, such evidence should be excluded.
Contours of "Detrimental to the Administration of Justice"
- Unfair trials are detrimental to justice.
- Six criteria may be applied, such as good faith, importance of evidence, seriousness of the crime, extent of the violation, public opinion, and time sensitivity/urgency of need to proceed promptly.
Cases (Examples)
- Njonjo Mue case
- Philomena Mbete case, including the subsequent actions by the parties, including the role played by the International Commission for Jurists (ICJ)
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore the complex debate surrounding the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in court. This quiz will challenge your understanding of the divergent views: whether to admit relevant evidence regardless of how it was obtained or to exclude it to maintain judicial integrity. Test your knowledge on the implications of these legal principles.
