3 Questions
Who has the power to decide what constitutes a breach of privilege laws and the appropriate sanction?
The legislators
What is the concern raised by breach of privilege laws?
Conflict of interest and fair trial violations
What is the suggested solution to remove uncertainty without losing flexibility?
Amending Article 19(2
Study Notes
- Breach of privilege laws raise concerns of conflict of interest and fair trial violations.
- Legislators can decide what constitutes a breach and the appropriate sanction.
- The absence of codified privileges gives unlimited power to the house.
- The presiding officer acts as complainant, advocate, and judge.
- Amending Article 19(2) can remove uncertainty without losing flexibility.
- The Committee of Privileges should have independent status.
- Members of the Committee should have a non-political approach.
- The Committee should be empowered to decide and investigate contempt proceedings.
- Proceedings before Parliamentary Committees should be open and reportable.
- Transparency should be prioritized unless there is a clear public interest.
Test your knowledge on parliamentary privilege laws with this informative quiz! From the powers of the house to the role of the presiding officer and the functions of the Committee of Privileges, this quiz covers essential concepts related to breaches, investigations, and contempt proceedings. Sharpen your understanding of the importance of transparency in parliamentary committees and learn about potential improvements to the current system. Whether you're a student, a legal professional, or a curious citizen, this quiz is a must-try for anyone interested in parliamentary
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
