Hammer v. Dagenhart Flashcards

Study Notes

Facts

Child Labor Act aimed to prohibit interstate transportation of goods produced with child labor.
A father of two children challenged the Act, claiming it was unconstitutional.

Government Action or Statute in Question

The case centered on the Commerce Clause regarding Congress's authority to enact the Child Labor Act.
Relevant constitutional provisions include the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment.

Constitutional Provision in Question

The focus was primarily on the Commerce Clause.

Holding

The ruling found the Child Labor Act unconstitutional.
Determined that the Commerce Clause does not empower Congress to regulate the interstate transportation of goods made using child labor.

Reasoning of the Majority

The Act was deemed unconstitutional on two grounds:
- Exceeds Congress's authority to regulate commerce.
- Interferes with local matters, violating the Tenth Amendment.
The manufacturing of goods, even if intended for interstate commerce, is not classified as commerce itself.
Control over employment ages in local manufacturing was not delegated to Congress.
The Act was interpreted as an overreach into state powers relating to local trade and manufacturing.

Doctrines

Clear differentiation established between manufacturing and commerce, emphasizing that production does not fall under congressional regulation.

Dissent

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes argued that the Act does not infringe upon state powers.
Stated that while states govern their internal affairs, once products cross state lines, they fall under federal jurisdiction.

Description

Explore key concepts and definitions related to the landmark case of Hammer v. Dagenhart. These flashcards provide insights into the Child Labor Act and its implications on interstate commerce. Test your knowledge of this pivotal moment in legal history.